Family Relatives as Structured Data in Electronic Health Records

被引:17
|
作者
Zhou, L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lu, Y. [1 ]
Vitale, C. J. [1 ]
Mar, P. L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chang, F. [1 ]
Dhopeshwarkar, N. [1 ]
Rocha, R. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Partners HealthCare Syst, Partners eCare, Clin Informat, Boston, MA USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gen Internal Med & Primary Care, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
来源
APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS | 2014年 / 5卷 / 02期
关键词
Terminology; SNOMED; HL7; family history; electronic health records; natural language processing; HISTORY; RISK;
D O I
10.4338/ACI-2013-10-RA-0080
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The ability to manage and leverage family history information in the electronic health is crucial to delivering high-quality clinical care. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate existing standards in representing relative information, examine this information documented in EHRs, and develop a natural language processing (NLP) application to extract relative information from free- text clinical documents. Methods: We reviewed a random sample of 100 admission notes and 100 discharge summaries of 198 patients, and also reviewed the structured entries for these patients in an EHR system's family history module. We investigated the two standards used by Stage 2 of Meaningful Use (SNOMED CT and HL7 Family History Standard) and identified coverage gaps of each standard in coding relative information. Finally, we evaluated the performance of the MTERMS NLP system in identifying relative information from free- text documents. Results: The structure and content of SNOMED CT and HL7 for representing relative information are different in several ways. Both terminologies have high coverage to represent local relative concepts built in an ambulatory EHR system, but gaps in key concept coverage were detected; coverage rates for relative information in free-text clinical documents were 95.2% and 98.6%, respectively. Compared to structured entries, richer family history information was only available in free-text documents. Using a comprehensive lexicon that included concepts and terms of relative information from different sources, we expanded the MTERMS NLP system to extract and encode relative information in clinical documents and achieved a corresponding precision of 100% and recall of 97.4%. Conclusions: Comprehensive assessment and user guidance are critical to adopting standards into EHR systems in a meaningful way. A significant portion of patients' family history information is only documented in free- text clinical documents and NLP can be used to extract this information.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 367
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Characterizing and Managing Missing Structured Data in Electronic Health Records: Data Analysis
    Beaulieu-Jones, Brett K.
    Lavage, Daniel R.
    Snyder, John W.
    Moore, Jason H.
    Pendergrass, Sarah A.
    Bauer, Christopher R.
    [J]. JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2018, 6 (01)
  • [2] Availability of information on functional limitations in structured electronic health records data
    Schiltz, Nicholas K.
    Foradori, Megan A.
    Reimer, Andrew P.
    Plow, Matthew
    Dolansky, Mary A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2022, 70 (07) : 2161 - 2163
  • [3] Challenges and opportunities beyond structured data in analysis of electronic health records
    Tayefi, Maryam
    Ngo, Phuong
    Chomutare, Taridzo
    Dalianis, Hercules
    Salvi, Elisa
    Budrionis, Andrius
    Godtliebsen, Fred
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS, 2021, 13 (06)
  • [4] Graph and Structured Data Algorithms in Electronic Health Records: A Scoping Review
    Ramosaj, Lorik
    Bytyci, Aurite
    Shala, Bardh
    Bytyci, Eliot
    [J]. METADATA AND SEMANTIC RESEARCH, MTSR 2023, 2024, 2048 : 61 - 73
  • [5] Clinical Coding Support Based on Structured Data Stored in Electronic Health Records
    Ferrao, Jose C.
    Oliveira, Monica D.
    Janela, Filipe
    Martins, Henrique M. G.
    [J]. 2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICINE WORKSHOPS (BIBMW), 2012,
  • [6] Capturing Structured, Pulmonary Disease-Specific Data Elements in Electronic Health Records
    Gabriel, Peter E.
    Gronkiewicz, Cynthia
    Diamond, Edward J.
    French, Kim D.
    Christodouleas, John
    [J]. CHEST, 2015, 147 (04) : 1152 - 1160
  • [7] Melanoma Risk Prediction with Structured Electronic Health Records
    Richter, Aaron N.
    Khoshgoftaar, Taghi M.
    [J]. ACM-BCB'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS, COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2018, : 194 - 199
  • [8] SEMANTICS FROM LOOSELY STRUCTURED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS
    ESSIN, DJ
    [J]. METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 1993, 32 (04) : 341 - 341
  • [9] Electronic Health Records and Data Quality
    Walji, Muhammad F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2019, 83 (03) : 263 - 264
  • [10] Federated and distributed learning applications for electronic health records and structured medical data: a scoping review
    Li, Siqi
    Liu, Pinyan
    Nascimento, Gustavo G.
    Wang, Xinru
    Leite, Fabio Renato Manzolli
    Chakraborty, Bibhas
    Hong, Chuan
    Ning, Yilin
    Xie, Feng
    Teo, Zhen Ling
    Ting, Daniel Shu Wei
    Haddadi, Hamed
    Ong, Marcus Eng Hock
    Peres, Marco Aurelio
    Liu, Nan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2023, 30 (12) : 2041 - 2049