Assessment of public oral healthcare services in Curitiba, Brazil: a cross-sectional study using the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool)

被引:4
|
作者
Nascimento, Antonio Carlos [1 ]
Moyses, Simone Tetu [2 ]
Werneck, Renata Iani [2 ]
Leao Gabardo, Marilisa Carneiro [1 ]
Moyses, Samuel Jorge [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Posit, Sch Hlth Sci, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica Parana, Sch Life Sci, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
CHILDHOOD MORTALITY; INEQUALITIES; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023283
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To compare two different models of public oral health in primary care services, a so-called family health strategy (FHS), as opposed to non-FHS services designated as 'conventional' healthcare (CHC), regarding the presence and extent of the attributes of 'good' primary healthcare (PHC). The null hypothesis of this study is that the attributes do not differ between the FHS and CHC. Design Cross-sectional. Setting Public PHC services in Curitiba, the state capital of Parana. Participants PHC users of the public oral health network (n= 900) and dentists active in this municipal network (n= 203). Primary and secondary outcome measures The Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool)-Dentists and PCATool-Users were used to analyse the primary outcomes ('essential' attributes) and secondary outcomes ('derived' attributes) in the PHC. Results Overall, the primary care services in oral health were well evaluated, both by users and by dentists, with mean scores ascribed to PHC attributes mostly above the cut-off point (6.6). The exception for users were affiliation (6.36; 95% CI 6.11 to 6.60) and accessibility (5.83; 95% CI 5.78 to 5.89); and for dentists the accessibility (5.80; 95% CI 5.63 to 5.96). When comparing FHS and CHC, there was a superiority of the FHS model, which reached a general mean score of 7.53 (95% CI 7.48 to 7.58) among users and 7.56 (95% CI 7.45 to 7.67) among dentists; on the other hand, the CHC general mean score was of 6.61 (95% CI 6.49 to 6.73) and 6.68 (95% CI 6.56 to 6.80) respectively for users and dentists. Conclusions The results reveal a reasonable level of attainment of PHC attributes in the services investigated. Nevertheless, public health managers should make efforts to reduce the difficulties faced by users in accessing dental care. The more positive results achieved by FHS services indicate that the provision of oral healthcare under this strategy should be expanded.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk assessment for oral urgent treatment in Primary Healthcare: a cross-sectional study
    Ribeiro Ramos, Danielle Viana
    Miraglia, Joao Luiz
    Monteiro, Camila Nascimento
    Borchardt, Danielle
    Tribis, Leonardo
    Sanchez, Thais Paragis
    Bonfim, Daiana
    Palacio, Danielle da Costa
    Rosario de Souza, Maria da Luz
    Batista de Brito Mota, Marilia Jesus
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [2] Risk assessment for oral urgent treatment in Primary Healthcare: a cross-sectional study
    Danielle Viana Ribeiro Ramos
    João Luiz Miraglia
    Camila Nascimento Monteiro
    Danielle Borchardt
    Leonardo Tribis
    Thais Paragis Sanchez
    Daiana Bonfim
    Danielle da Costa Palacio
    Maria da Luz Rosário de Souza
    Marília Jesus Batista de Brito Mota
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 20
  • [3] Validation of the Brazilian version of Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT) for Oral Health - PCATool Brazil Oral Health for Professionals
    D'Avila, Otavio Pereira
    Harzheim, Erno
    Hauser, Lisiane
    Pinto, Luiz Felipe
    de Castilhos, Eduardo Dickie
    Hugo, Fernando Neves
    [J]. CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2021, 26 (06): : 2097 - 2108
  • [4] The assessment of the quality of primary care using the SERVQUAL scale: A cross-sectional study in Morocco
    El Mouaddib, Hicham
    Sebbani, Majda
    Adarmouch, Latifa
    Amine, Mohamed
    [J]. MEDICINA BALEAR, 2024, 39 (03):
  • [5] Scalability assessment of innovations in primary health care: a cross-sectional study
    Ben Charif, Ali
    Hassani, Kasra
    Wong, Sabrina T.
    Zomahoun, Herve Tchala Vignon
    Fortin, Martin
    Freitas, Adriana
    Katz, Alan
    Kendall, Claire
    Liddy, Clare
    Nicholson, Kathryn
    Petrovic, Bojana
    Ploeg, Jenny
    Legare, France
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2019, 14
  • [6] An Assessment of Health Behaviours in Primary Care Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Gawlowska, Barbara
    Chawlowska, Ewelina
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (14)
  • [7] Assessment of antibiotic prescribing quality in primary care: a cross-sectional study
    Fernandez-Urrusuno, R.
    Rodriguez, L.
    Serrano, C.
    Corral, S.
    Vilches, A.
    Montero, M. C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2013, 35 (05) : 981 - 982
  • [8] The effects of gatekeeping on the quality of primary care in Guangdong Province, China: a cross-sectional study using primary care assessment tool-adult edition
    Liang, Cuiying
    Mei, Jie
    Liang, Yuan
    Hu, Ruwei
    Li, Li
    Kuang, Li
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [9] The effects of gatekeeping on the quality of primary care in Guangdong Province, China: a cross-sectional study using primary care assessment tool-adult edition
    Cuiying Liang
    Jie Mei
    Yuan Liang
    Ruwei Hu
    Li Li
    Li Kuang
    [J]. BMC Family Practice, 20
  • [10] Evaluating diabetes care in primary healthcare centers in Abuja, Nigeria: a cross-sectional formative assessment
    Orji, Ikechukwu A.
    Baldridge, Abigail S.
    Ikechukwu-Orji, Mercy U.
    Banigbe, Bolanle
    Eze, Nelson C.
    Chopra, Aashima
    Omitiran, Kasarachi
    Iyer, Guhan
    Odoh, Deborah
    Alex-Okoh, Morenike
    Reng, Rifkatu
    Hirschhorn, Lisa R.
    Huffman, Mark D.
    Ojji, Dike B.
    [J]. BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2024, 25 (01):