The effects of gatekeeping on the quality of primary care in Guangdong Province, China: a cross-sectional study using primary care assessment tool-adult edition

被引:16
|
作者
Liang, Cuiying [1 ]
Mei, Jie [1 ]
Liang, Yuan [1 ]
Hu, Ruwei [1 ]
Li, Li [2 ,3 ]
Kuang, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Adm, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Family Med & Community Hlth, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Dept Family Med, Charlottesville, VA USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Gatekeeping; Primary care; Quality of primary care; Propensity score matching; Cross-sectional survey; COMMUNITY-HEALTH CENTERS; PLAN; EXPERIENCE; EFFICIENCY; REFERRALS; PHYSICIAN; SERVICES; SHENZHEN; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-019-0982-z
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundDeveloped countries have widely implemented a gatekeeping system as a core policy of primary care, also known as the system of first visit in the community. As gatekeepers, general practitioners are responsible for the diagnosis and treatment of residents in the community health centres, andreferring patients to specialists as appropriate. After several years of healthcare reform, gatekeeping policy has achieved remarkable success in China. Shenzhen and Dongguan were the first batch of pilot cities that implemented the policy of gatekeeping. This study aims to examine the effects of gatekeeping on the quality of primary care between the gatekeeping and non-gatekeeping groups in these two pilot cities.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in five community health centres in Shenzhen and Dongguan cities, both located within Guangdong Province, China, using a validated Chinese version of the Primary Care Assessment Tool-Adult Edition (PCAT-AE) and carrying out face-to-face interviews with patients 18years and older. Analyses were grouped according to whether or not patients had gatekeepers. Propensity Score Matching was used to control for confounding factors. A chi-square test was used to compare the factors mentioned above and an independent t-test was performed to compare the eight domains of the core functions of primary care between the two groups of patients.ResultsIn total, 765 valid questionnaires were collected for analysis, after matching the sample size were 238 pairs. All the confounding factors observed between the gatekeeping and non-gatekeeping groups were balanced. The PCAT-AE scores for first-contact utilisation (3.29>2.66, p<0.001) and coordination (2.06>1.95, p<0.05) were higher in the gatekeeping group after matching, but the domains of accessibility (1.59<1.67, p<0.05) and continuity (2.26<2.40, p<0.05) were lower. The PCAT-AE mean score was slightly higher in gatekeeping group (1.98>1.93, p>0.05) but without statistical significance.ConclusionThis study demonstrated that gatekeeping has helped to improve first-contact utilisation and coordination of primary care, but that other goals such as continuity and comprehensiveness have been harmed. To establish a sustainable gatekeeping system and to strengthen the core functions of the community comprehensively, the current gatekeeping system needs refinement.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effects of gatekeeping on the quality of primary care in Guangdong Province, China: a cross-sectional study using primary care assessment tool-adult edition
    Cuiying Liang
    Jie Mei
    Yuan Liang
    Ruwei Hu
    Li Li
    Li Kuang
    BMC Family Practice, 20
  • [2] General practitioners versus other physicians in the quality of primary care: a cross-sectional study in Guangdong Province, China
    Zou, Yaming
    Zhang, Xiao
    Hao, Yuantao
    Shi, Leiyu
    Hu, Ruwei
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2015, 16
  • [3] General practitioners versus other physicians in the quality of primary care: a cross-sectional study in Guangdong Province, China
    Yaming Zou
    Xiao Zhang
    Yuantao Hao
    Leiyu Shi
    Ruwei Hu
    BMC Family Practice, 16
  • [4] Assessment of antibiotic prescribing quality in primary care: a cross-sectional study
    Fernandez-Urrusuno, R.
    Rodriguez, L.
    Serrano, C.
    Corral, S.
    Vilches, A.
    Montero, M. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2013, 35 (05) : 981 - 982
  • [5] The assessment of the quality of primary care using the SERVQUAL scale: A cross-sectional study in Morocco
    El Mouaddib, Hicham
    Sebbani, Majda
    Adarmouch, Latifa
    Amine, Mohamed
    MEDICINA BALEAR, 2024, 39 (03):
  • [6] Depression, quality of life and primary care: A cross-sectional study
    Andriopoulos P.
    Lotti-Lykousa M.
    Pappa E.
    Papadopoulos A.A.
    Niakas D.
    Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health, 2013, 3 (4) : 245 - 252
  • [7] Usual source of care and the quality of primary care: a survey of patients in Guangdong province, China
    Zhicheng Du
    Yu Liao
    Chien-Chou Chen
    Yuantao Hao
    Ruwei Hu
    International Journal for Equity in Health, 14
  • [8] Usual source of care and the quality of primary care: a survey of patients in Guangdong province, China
    Du, Zhicheng
    Liao, Yu
    Chen, Chien-Chou
    Hao, Yuantao
    Hu, Ruwei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2015, 14
  • [9] A primary care cross-sectional study of undiagnosed adult coeliac disease
    Sanders, DS
    Patel, D
    Stephenson, TJ
    Ward, AM
    McCloskey, EV
    Hadjivassiliou, M
    Lobo, AJ
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2003, 15 (04) : 407 - 413
  • [10] Caries Risk Assessment and Dental Referral by Paediatric Primary Care Physicians in Sichuan Province, China: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Wang, Qingyu
    Qu, Xing
    Houser, Shannon H.
    Zhang, Yan
    Tian, Meirong
    Zhang, Qiong
    Zhang, Wei
    RISK MANAGEMENT AND HEALTHCARE POLICY, 2022, 15 : 1641 - 1650