The effects of gatekeeping on the quality of primary care in Guangdong Province, China: a cross-sectional study using primary care assessment tool-adult edition

被引:16
|
作者
Liang, Cuiying [1 ]
Mei, Jie [1 ]
Liang, Yuan [1 ]
Hu, Ruwei [1 ]
Li, Li [2 ,3 ]
Kuang, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Adm, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Family Med & Community Hlth, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Dept Family Med, Charlottesville, VA USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Gatekeeping; Primary care; Quality of primary care; Propensity score matching; Cross-sectional survey; COMMUNITY-HEALTH CENTERS; PLAN; EXPERIENCE; EFFICIENCY; REFERRALS; PHYSICIAN; SERVICES; SHENZHEN; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-019-0982-z
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundDeveloped countries have widely implemented a gatekeeping system as a core policy of primary care, also known as the system of first visit in the community. As gatekeepers, general practitioners are responsible for the diagnosis and treatment of residents in the community health centres, andreferring patients to specialists as appropriate. After several years of healthcare reform, gatekeeping policy has achieved remarkable success in China. Shenzhen and Dongguan were the first batch of pilot cities that implemented the policy of gatekeeping. This study aims to examine the effects of gatekeeping on the quality of primary care between the gatekeeping and non-gatekeeping groups in these two pilot cities.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in five community health centres in Shenzhen and Dongguan cities, both located within Guangdong Province, China, using a validated Chinese version of the Primary Care Assessment Tool-Adult Edition (PCAT-AE) and carrying out face-to-face interviews with patients 18years and older. Analyses were grouped according to whether or not patients had gatekeepers. Propensity Score Matching was used to control for confounding factors. A chi-square test was used to compare the factors mentioned above and an independent t-test was performed to compare the eight domains of the core functions of primary care between the two groups of patients.ResultsIn total, 765 valid questionnaires were collected for analysis, after matching the sample size were 238 pairs. All the confounding factors observed between the gatekeeping and non-gatekeeping groups were balanced. The PCAT-AE scores for first-contact utilisation (3.29>2.66, p<0.001) and coordination (2.06>1.95, p<0.05) were higher in the gatekeeping group after matching, but the domains of accessibility (1.59<1.67, p<0.05) and continuity (2.26<2.40, p<0.05) were lower. The PCAT-AE mean score was slightly higher in gatekeeping group (1.98>1.93, p>0.05) but without statistical significance.ConclusionThis study demonstrated that gatekeeping has helped to improve first-contact utilisation and coordination of primary care, but that other goals such as continuity and comprehensiveness have been harmed. To establish a sustainable gatekeeping system and to strengthen the core functions of the community comprehensively, the current gatekeeping system needs refinement.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Factors associated with using alternative sources of primary care: a cross-sectional study
    Reed, Charlie
    Rabito, Felicia A.
    Werthmann, Derek
    Smith, Shannon
    Carlson, John C.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [42] Multifactor Analysis on the Income of Primary Health Care Institutions Implementing EMS in Hubei Province, China: A Cross-sectional Study
    Yang, Lianping
    Zhang, Xinping
    Liu, Wenbin
    Wang, Hongtao
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2012, 14 (03) : 259 - 268
  • [43] Factors associated with using alternative sources of primary care: a cross-sectional study
    Charlie Reed
    Felicia A. Rabito
    Derek Werthmann
    Shannon Smith
    John C. Carlson
    BMC Health Services Research, 19
  • [44] Patients’ loyalty to primary care institutions and associated factors in China: a cross-sectional study
    Liqing Li
    Qi Zhang
    Liyong Zhu
    Guohua Zeng
    Hongwei Huang
    Zhensheng Chen
    Xiaogang Zhou
    Xiaofang Wang
    Zisheng Xu
    Chunmei Wu
    Di Yang
    Xiaoting Zhai
    Sule Yang
    Zuxun Lu
    Yong Gan
    Zuxun Lu
    BMC Health Services Research, 25 (1)
  • [45] Drug prescription goals in primary care: a cross-sectional study
    Bernard, Louis
    Ecochard, Rene
    Gueyffier, Francois
    Letrilliart, Laurent
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [46] The Treatment of Depression in Primary Care A Cross-sectional Epidemiological Study
    Trautmann, Sebastian
    Beesdo-Baum, Katja
    Knappe, Susanne
    Einsle, Franziska
    Knothe, Lisa
    Wieder, Gesine
    Venz, John
    Rummel-Kluge, Christine
    Heinz, Ines
    Koburger, Nicole
    Schouler-Ocak, Meryam
    Wilbertz, Theresia
    Unger, Hans-Peter
    Walter, Ulrich
    Hein, Joachim
    Hegerl, Ulrich
    Lieb, Roselind
    Pfennig, Andrea
    Schmitt, Jochen
    Hoyer, Juergen
    Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich
    Bergmann, Antje
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 114 (43): : 721 - +
  • [47] Prevalence of causes of insomnia in primary care: a cross-sectional study
    Arroll, Bruce
    Fernando, Antonio, III
    Falloon, Karen
    Goodyear-Smith, Felicity
    Samaranayake, Chinthaka
    Warman, Guy
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2012, 62 (595): : e99 - e103
  • [48] Overdiagnosis of heart failure in primary care: a cross-sectional study
    Valk, Mark J.
    Mosterd, Arend
    Broekhuizen, Berna D. L.
    Zuithoff, Nicolaas P. A.
    Landman, Marcel A. J.
    Hoes, Arno W.
    Rutten, Frans H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2016, 66 (649): : E587 - E592
  • [49] Drug prescription goals in primary care: a cross-sectional study
    Louis Bernard
    René Ecochard
    François Gueyffier
    Laurent Letrilliart
    BMC Health Services Research, 20
  • [50] ALCOHOLISM SCREENING IN A PRIMARY CARE POPULATION - A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
    MORET, V
    PECOUD, A
    YERSIN, B
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1991, 39 (02): : A638 - A638