Decision making under uncertainty in the alarm systems response

被引:2
|
作者
Si Mohammed, Antar [1 ]
Smail, Rachid [1 ]
Chebila, Mourad [1 ]
机构
[1] Batna 2 Univ, LRPI Lab, Hlth & Safety Inst, Batna, Algeria
关键词
Decision-making; Risk management; Uncertainty analysis; Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process; HIERARCHY PROCESS; PROBABILITY; METHODOLOGY;
D O I
10.1108/IJQRM-03-2019-0078
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop an advanced decision-making support for the appropriate responding to critical alarms in the hazardous industrial facilities. Design/methodology/approach A fuzzy analytical hierarchy process is suggested by considering three alternatives and four criteria using triangular fuzzy numbers to handle the associated uncertainty. A logarithmic fuzzy preference programming (LFPP)-based nonlinear priority method is employed to analyze the suggested model. Findings A quantitative decision-making support is not only a necessity in responding to critical alarms but also easy to implement even in a relatively short reaction time. Confirmation may not be the appropriate option to deal with a critical alarm, even with the availability of the needed resources. Practical implications A situation related to a flammable gas alarm in a gas plant is treated using the developed model showing its practical efficiency and practicality. Originality/value The proposed model provides a rational, simple and holistic fuzzy multi criteria tool with a refined number of criteria and alternatives using an LFPP method to handle process alarms.
引用
收藏
页码:1151 / 1161
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimal decision making under uncertainty
    Ronald Hochreiter
    Daniel Kuhn
    [J]. Computational Management Science, 2012, 9 (1) : 1 - 2
  • [22] A workflow for decision making under uncertainty
    Busby, Daniel
    Da Veiga, Sebastien
    Touzani, Samir
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL GEOSCIENCES, 2014, 18 (3-4) : 519 - 533
  • [23] Decision making under subjective uncertainty
    Campos, Fabio
    Neves, Andre
    Campello de Souza, Fernando M.
    [J]. 2007 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING, 2007, : 85 - +
  • [24] The cerebellum and decision making under uncertainty
    Blackwood, N
    Ffytche, D
    Simmons, A
    Bentall, R
    Murray, R
    Howard, R
    [J]. COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2004, 20 (01): : 46 - 53
  • [25] A MODEL FOR DECISION MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY
    BULLOCK, JB
    LOGAN, SH
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS RESEARCH, 1969, 21 (04): : 109 - &
  • [26] DECISION-MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY
    REA, A
    [J]. MICROPROCESSING AND MICROPROGRAMMING, 1993, 38 (1-5): : 801 - 802
  • [27] Decision-making under uncertainty for multi-robot systems
    Lacerda, Bruno
    Gautier, Anna
    Rutherford, Alex
    Stephens, Alex
    Street, Charlie
    Hawes, Nick
    [J]. AI COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 35 (04) : 433 - 441
  • [28] DECISION-MAKING UNDER MODEL UNCERTAINTY OF DAMAGED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS
    Lopez, Israel
    Sarigul-Klijn, Nesrin
    [J]. IMECE2009, VOL 15: SOUND, VIBRATION AND DESIGN, 2010, : 567 - 577
  • [29] Decision Making with Uncertainty in Immersive Systems
    Raglin, Adrienne
    Dennison, Mark
    Metu, Somiya
    Trout, Theron
    James, Deryck
    [J]. VIRTUAL, AUGMENTED, AND MIXED REALITY (XR) TECHNOLOGY FOR MULTI-DOMAIN OPERATIONS, 2020, 11426
  • [30] Decision making and age: Factors influencing decision making under uncertainty
    Sproten, Alec N.
    Diener, Carsten
    Fiebach, Christian J.
    Schwieren, Christiane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 76 : 43 - 54