Sensing Archaeology in the North: The Use of Non-Destructive Geophysical and Remote Sensing Methods in Archaeology in Scandinavian and North Atlantic Territories

被引:12
|
作者
Cuenca-Garcia, Carmen [1 ]
Risbol, Ole [1 ]
Bates, C. Richard [2 ]
Stamnes, Arne Anderson [1 ]
Skoglund, Fredrik [1 ]
Odegard, Oyvind [1 ]
Viberg, Andreas [3 ]
Koivisto, Satu [4 ]
Fuglsang, Mikkel [5 ]
Gabler, Manuel [6 ,7 ]
Mauritsen, Esben Schlosser [8 ]
Perttola, Wesa [9 ]
Solem, Dag-Oyvind [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, NTNU Univ Museum, Dept Archaeol & Cultural Hist, Erling Skakkes Gate 47B, N-7012 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Univ St Andrews, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, St Andrews KY16 9AJ, Fife, Scotland
[3] Guideline Geomala ABEM, SE-17266 Sundbyberg, Sweden
[4] Univ Turku, Dept Archaeol, FI-20014 Turku, Finland
[5] Midtjylland Museum, DK-7400 Herning, Denmark
[6] Norwegian Inst Cultural Heritage Res, N-0155 Oslo, Norway
[7] Norwegian Inst Cultural Heritage Res, N-7013 Trondheim, Norway
[8] Ringkobing Skjern Museum ARKVEST, Dept Archaeol, DK-6900 Skjern, Denmark
[9] Univ Helsinki, Dept Cultures Archaeol, Helsinki 00014, Finland
关键词
remote sensing; near-surface geophysics; archaeological geophysics; marine archaeology; archaeological prospection; aerial archaeology; cultural heritage management; LiDAR; airborne laser scanning (ALS); photogrammetry; unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV); drone mapping; underwater robotics; side-scan sonar (SSS); synthetic aperture sonar (SAS); underwater hyperspectral imaging (UHI); magnetometry; earth resistance; resistivity; electromagnetic induction; ground-penetrating radar (GPR); reflectance transformation imaging (RTI); image-based modelling (IBM); PHOTOGRAMMETRY; PROSPECTION; SETTLEMENT; AERIAL; SITE;
D O I
10.3390/rs12183102
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In August 2018, a group of experts working with terrestrial/marine geophysics and remote sensing methods to explore archaeological sites in Denmark, Finland, Norway, Scotland and Sweden gathered together for the first time at the Workshop 'Sensing Archaeology in The North'. The goal was to exchange experiences, discuss challenges, and consider future directions for further developing these methods and strategies for their use in archaeology. After the event, this special journal issue was arranged to publish papers that are based on the workshop presentations, but also to incorporate work that is produced by other researchers in the field. This paper closes the special issue and further aims to provide current state-of-the-art for the methods represented by the workshop. Here, we introduce the aspects that inspired the organisation of the meeting, a summary of the 12 presentations and eight paper contributions, as well as a discussion about the main outcomes of the workshop roundtables, including the production of two searchable databases (online resources and equipment). We conclude with the position that the 'North', together with its unique cultural heritage and thriving research community, is at the forefront of good practice in the application and development of sensing methods in archaeological research and management. However, further method development is required, so we claim the support of funding bodies to back research efforts based on testing/experimental studies to: explore unknown survey environments and identify optimal survey conditions, as well as to monitor the preservation of archaeological remains, especially those that are at risk. It is demonstrated that remote sensing and geophysics not only have an important role in the safeguarding of archaeological sites from development and within prehistorical-historical research, but the methods can be especially useful in recording and monitoring the increased impact of climate change on sites in the North.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Remote sensing in archaeology an explicitly north american perspective
    Hamilton, Derek
    [J]. ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROSPECTION, 2007, 14 (02) : 149 - 150
  • [2] Ethical challenges in the practice of remote sensing and geophysical archaeology
    Davis, Dylan S.
    Sanger, Matthew C.
    [J]. ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROSPECTION, 2021, 28 (03) : 271 - 278
  • [3] ARRAYING TERRITORIES REMOTE SENSING AND ESCALATION IN THE NORTH
    Roennskog, Ann-Sofi
    Palmesino, John
    [J]. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN, 2014, 84 (01) : 30 - 39
  • [5] Ethical considerations for remote sensing and open data in relation to the endangered archaeology in the Middle East and North Africa project
    Fisher, Michael
    Fradley, Michael
    Flohr, Pascal
    Rouhani, Bijan
    Simi, Francesca
    [J]. ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROSPECTION, 2021, 28 (03) : 279 - 292
  • [6] The Importance of Minimally Invasive Remote Sensing Methods in Huron-Wendat Archaeology
    Warrick, Gary
    Glencross, Bonnie
    Lesage, Louis
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 9 (03): : 238 - 249
  • [7] REMOTE ACOUSTIC SENSING OF INTERNAL WAVE FIELDS IN THE NORTH-ATLANTIC
    ORR, MH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1979, 65 : S87 - S87
  • [8] Satellite Remote Sensing and Non-Destructive Testing Methods for Transport Infrastructure Monitoring: Advances, Challenges and Perspectives
    Gagliardi, Valerio
    Tosti, Fabio
    Ciampoli, Luca Bianchini
    Battagliere, Maria Libera
    D'Amato, Luigi
    Alani, Amir M.
    Benedetto, Andrea
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (02)
  • [9] Comparison of Non-destructive Sensing Methods on Surface Created by Waterjet Technology
    Klich, Jiri
    Klichova, Dagmar
    Soucek, Kamil
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS, ICMEM 2018, 2019, : 114 - 123
  • [10] Integrated Geophysical and Aerial Sensing Methods for Archaeology: A Case History in the Punic Site of Villamar (Sardinia, Italy)
    Piga, Carlo
    Piroddi, Luca
    Pompianu, Elisa
    Ranieri, Gaetano
    Stocco, Stefano
    Trogu, Antonio
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 6 (11): : 10986 - 11012