Comparison of Non-destructive Sensing Methods on Surface Created by Waterjet Technology

被引:0
|
作者
Klich, Jiri [1 ,2 ]
Klichova, Dagmar [1 ,2 ]
Soucek, Kamil [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CAS, Vvi, Inst Geon, Ostrava 70800, Czech Republic
[2] Inst Clean Technol Min & Utilisat Raw Mat Energy, Ostrava 70800, Czech Republic
关键词
X-Ray computed tomography; Optical profilometer; Digital microscope; Surface topography; Waterjet technology; CW614N; JET;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-99353-9_13
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The article is a response to the lack of information, especially in the area of non-destructive techniques suitable for wide practical application. The article deals with evaluation of the disintegrated material volume removed from the samples by a water jet. The study presents a quantified disintegrated material volume by means of an optical profilometer MicroProf FRT, a digital microscope VHX-5100 and X-ray computed micro-tomograph XT H 225 ST. Based on a comparison of measured data, it is possible to state that the methods of optical profilometer and a digital microscope give us very close volume values. While the values of the volume of removed material analysed by X-Ray mu-CT reach higher its values. After detailed analysis of the individual tomographic cross-sections in area of kerf surface it can be concluded that complex morphology of this surface can explain differences in the results. There are visible some re-entrant features like an overhangs and undercuts at the surface created by high pressure water jet.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 123
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF 2 NON-DESTRUCTIVE METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF ROOT SURFACE-AREAS
    SATTELMACHER, B
    KLOTZ, F
    MARSCHNER, H
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PFLANZENERNAHRUNG UND BODENKUNDE, 1983, 146 (04): : 449 - 459
  • [2] Comparison of Properties of Shotcrete Tested Using Destructive and Non-destructive Methods
    Hubacek, Adam
    Brozovsky, Jiri
    Hela, Rudolf
    [J]. CONCRETE AND CONCRETE STRUCTURES 2013 - 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, SLOVAKIA, 2013, 65 : 63 - 68
  • [3] Comparison of non-destructive and destructive Tests of thin Structural Bonds in the Forming Technology
    Hofmann, Dennis
    Raham-Mer, Markus
    Liewald, Mathias
    Heckel, Thomas
    Huppmann, Michael
    [J]. MATERIALS TESTING, 2016, 58 (11-12) : 975 - 981
  • [4] Comparison of Rail Head Checks Using Destructive and Non-Destructive Examination Methods
    Mate, Tamas
    Zwierczyk, Peter T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAILURE ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2022, 22 (05) : 1898 - 1904
  • [5] Comparison of Rail Head Checks Using Destructive and Non-Destructive Examination Methods
    Tamás Máté
    Péter T. Zwierczyk
    [J]. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2022, 22 : 1898 - 1904
  • [6] New Methods for Non-Destructive Underground Fiber Localization using Distributed Fiber Optic Sensing Technology
    Liu, Hansi
    Huang, Ming-Fang
    Chen, Yuheng
    Fan, Xiaoran
    Wang, Ting
    Gruteser, Marco
    [J]. 2020 OPTO-ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE (OECC 2020), 2020,
  • [7] Research on Electromagnetic Sensing Detection Technology for Non-Destructive Testing Applications
    Wang, Dongdong
    Cao, Feng
    Guo, Shuzhi
    Yu, Yan
    [J]. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 2024, 9 (01)
  • [8] Evaluation of quality and safety of agricultural products by non-destructive sensing technology
    Li, Jiangbo
    Lu, Yuzhen
    Qin, Jianwei
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2023, 14
  • [9] The measurement of current distribution in superconducting tape.: Comparison of destructive and non-destructive methods
    Usák, P
    [J]. PHYSICA C-SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2003, 384 (1-2): : 93 - 101
  • [10] Determination of concrete quality with destructive and non-destructive methods
    Kibar, Hakan
    Ozturk, Turgut
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND CONCRETE, 2015, 15 (03): : 473 - 484