A review of accuracy assessment for object-based image analysis: From per-pixel to per-polygon approaches

被引:136
|
作者
Ye, Su [1 ]
Pontius, Robert Gilmore, Jr. [1 ]
Rakshit, Rahul [1 ]
机构
[1] Clark Univ, Grad Sch Geog, Worcester, MA 01610 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Accuracy assessment; Object-based image analysis; OBIA; Remote sensing; Per-pixel; Per-polygon; REMOTE-SENSING DATA; LANDSAT; 8; OLI; ORIENTED CLASSIFICATION; URBAN VEGETATION; SYNERGISTIC USE; MAP ACCURACY; COVER TYPES; LIDAR DATA; SEGMENTATION; QUICKBIRD;
D O I
10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.04.002
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Object-based image analysis (OBIA) has gained widespread popularity for creating maps from remotely sensed data. Researchers routinely claim that OBIA procedures outperform pixel-based procedures; however, it is not immediately obvious how to evaluate the degree to which an OBIA map compares to reference information in a manner that accounts for the fact that the OBIA map consists of objects that vary in size and shape. Our study reviews 209 journal articles concerning OBIA published between 2003 and 2017. We focus on the three stages of accuracy assessment: (1) sampling design, (2) response design and (3) accuracy analysis. First, we report the literature's overall characteristics concerning OBIA accuracy assessment. Simple random sampling was the most used method among probability sampling strategies, slightly more than stratified sampling. Office interpreted remotely sensed data was the dominant reference source. The literature reported accuracies ranging from 42% to 96%, with an average of 85%. A third of the articles failed to give sufficient information concerning accuracy methodology such as sampling scheme and sample size. We found few studies that focused specifically on the accuracy of the segmentation. Second, we identify a recent increase of OBIA articles in using per-polygon approaches compared to per-pixel approaches for accuracy assessment. We clarify the impacts of the per-pixel versus the per polygon approaches respectively on sampling, response design and accuracy analysis. Our review defines the technical and methodological needs in the current per-polygon approaches, such as polygon-based sampling, analysis of mixed polygons, matching of mapped with reference polygons and assessment of segmentation accuracy. Our review summarizes and discusses the current issues in object-based accuracy assessment to provide guidance for improved accuracy assessments for OBIA. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Inc. (ISPRS).
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 147
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison and validation of per-pixel and object-based approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping
    Nachappa, Thimmaiah Gudiyangada
    Kienberger, Stefan
    Meena, Sansar Raj
    Hoelbling, Daniel
    Blaschke, Thomas
    [J]. GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2020, 11 (01) : 572 - 600
  • [2] Combining per-pixel and object-based classifications for mapping land cover over large areas
    Costa, Hugo
    Carrao, Hugo
    Bacao, Fernando
    Caetano, Mario
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 35 (02) : 738 - 753
  • [3] Classification of Mediterranean crops with multisensor data: Per-pixel versus per-object statistics and image segmentation
    Lobo, A
    Chic, O
    Casterad, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1996, 17 (12) : 2385 - 2400
  • [4] Accurate per-pixel hand detection from a single depth image
    Zhang, Zhao
    Zhang, Zhijiang
    Zhang, Haiwei
    Zeng, Dan
    [J]. OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 56 (03)
  • [5] Per-Pixel Dark Current Spectroscopy Measurement and Analysis in CMOS Image Sensors
    Webster, Eric A. G.
    Nicol, Robert L.
    Grant, Lindsay
    Renshaw, David
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, 2010, 57 (09) : 2176 - 2182
  • [6] Object-Based Method Outperforms Per-Pixel Method for Land Cover Classification in a Protected Area of the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest Region
    T.RITTL
    M.COOPER
    R.J.HECK
    M.V.R.BALLESTER
    [J]. Pedosphere, 2013, (03) : 290 - 297
  • [7] COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT BETWEEN PER-PIXEL AND OBJECT-ORIENTED FOR MAPPING LAND COVER AND USE
    Prudente, Victor H. R.
    da Silva, Bruno B.
    Johann, Jerry A.
    Mercante, Erivelto
    Oldoni, Lucas V.
    [J]. ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA, 2017, 37 (05): : 1015 - 1027
  • [8] Object-Based Method Outperforms Per-Pixel Method for Land Cover Classification in a Protected Area of the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest Region
    Rittl, T.
    Cooper, M.
    Heck, R. J.
    Ballester, M. V. R.
    [J]. PEDOSPHERE, 2013, 23 (03) : 290 - 297
  • [9] Object-Based vs. Per-Pixel Classification of Aster Imagery for Land Cover Mapping in Semi-Arid Areas
    El Abbas, Mustafa M.
    Csaplovics, E.
    [J]. EARTH RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL REMOTE SENSING/GIS APPLICATIONS II, 2011, 8181
  • [10] Object-Based Method Outperforms Per-Pixel Method for Land Cover Classification in a Protected Area of the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest Region
    TRITTL
    MCOOPER
    RJHECK
    MVRBALLESTER
    [J]. Pedosphere., 2013, 23 (03) - 297