Evaluation of haptic virtual reality user interfaces for medical marking on 3D models

被引:14
|
作者
Li, Zhenxing [1 ]
Kiiveri, Maria [1 ]
Rantala, Jussi [1 ]
Raisamo, Roope [1 ]
机构
[1] Tampere Univ, Fac Informat Technol & Commun Sci, Tampere, Finland
关键词
3D visualization; Virtual reality; Haptic feedback; Force-feedback device; Medical marking; VISUALIZATION; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102561
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Three-dimensional (3D) visualization has been widely used in computer-aided medical diagnosis and planning. To interact with 3D models, current user interfaces in medical systems mainly rely on the traditional 2D interaction techniques by employing a mouse and a 2D display. There are promising haptic virtual reality (VR) interfaces which can enable intuitive and realistic 3D interaction by using VR equipment and haptic devices. However, the practical usability of the haptic VR interfaces in this medical field remains unexplored. In this study, we propose two haptic VR interfaces, a vibrotactile VR interface and a kinesthetic VR interface, for medical diagnosis and planning on volumetric medical images. The vibrotactile VR interface used a head mounted VR display as the visual output channel and a VR controller with vibrotactile feedback as the manipulation tool. Similarly, the kinesthetic VR interface used a head-mounted VR display as the visual output channel and a kinesthetic force-feedback device as the manipulation tool. We evaluated these two VR interfaces in an experiment involving medical marking on 3D models, by comparing them with the present state-of-the-art 2D interface as the baseline. The results showed that the kinesthetic VR interface performed the best in terms of marking accuracy, whereas the vibrotactile VR interface performed the best in terms of task completion time. Overall, the participants preferred to use the kinesthetic VR interface for the medical task.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Expert Evaluation of Haptic Virtual Reality User Interfaces for Medical Landmarking
    Kangas, Jari
    Li, Zhenxing
    Raisamo, Roope
    EXTENDED ABSTRACTS OF THE 2022 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, CHI 2022, 2022,
  • [2] Automating the extraction of 3D models from medical images for virtual reality and haptic simulations
    Rizzi, Silvio H.
    Banerjee, P. Pat
    Luciano, Cristian J.
    2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-3, 2007, : 489 - 494
  • [3] Design of Collaborative 3D User Interfaces for Virtual and Augmented Reality
    Grandi, Jeronimo G.
    2017 IEEE VIRTUAL REALITY (VR), 2017, : 419 - 420
  • [4] USER EXPERIENCE EVALUATION FOR 3D VIRTUAL REALITY GLASSES
    Yu, Mengli
    Zhou, Ronggang
    Zhao, Weihua
    Yu, Yongweijian
    ICIM'2016: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, : 55 - 62
  • [5] Entering the Next Dimension: A Review of 3D User Interfaces for Virtual Reality
    Yeo, Adriel
    Kwok, Benjamin W. J.
    Joshna, Angelene
    Chen, Kan
    Lee, Jeannie S. A.
    ELECTRONICS, 2024, 13 (03)
  • [6] 3D User Interface in Virtual Reality
    Yue, Gu
    HCI INTERNATIONAL 2021 - LATE BREAKING POSTERS, HCII 2021, PT I, 2021, 1498 : 418 - 423
  • [7] Evaluation of 3D Slicer as a medical virtual reality visualization platform
    Choueib, Saleh
    Pinter, Csaba
    Lasso, Andras
    Fillion-Robin, Jean-Christophe
    Vimort, Jean-Baptiste
    Martin, Ken
    Fichtinger, Gabor
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2019: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2019, 10951
  • [8] Evaluation of user preferences for 3d modeling and design reviews in virtual reality
    Nysetvold J.T.
    Salmon J.L.
    Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 2021, 18 (05): : 1035 - 1049
  • [9] A Critical Analysis of Human-Subject Experiments in Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces
    Andujar, Carlos
    Brunet, Pere
    VIRTUAL REALITIES, 2015, 8844 : 79 - 90
  • [10] Evaluation of haptic guidance virtual fixtures and 3D visualization methods in telemanipulation—a user study
    Kevin Huang
    Digesh Chitrakar
    Fredrik Rydén
    Howard Jay Chizeck
    Intelligent Service Robotics, 2019, 12 : 289 - 301