Does screening for myopia in New Zealand meet screening programme criteria?

被引:0
|
作者
Ben Wilkinson [1 ]
Wilson, Graham [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Gisborne Hosp, Tairawhiti Dist Hlth Board, Gisborne, New Zealand
[2] Univ Otago, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dunedin, New Zealand
关键词
PREVALENCE; PROGRESSION; IMPACT; COST; IMPAIRMENT; ATROPINE; VISION; TIME; IMI;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
AIM: The purpose of this paper is to assess whether screening for myopia in New Zealand is valid under scrutiny of the Wilson and Jungner criteria. There is a worldwide myopia epidemic which requires urgent attention to reduce vision impairment, blindness and costs to wider society. The risks associated with myopia are under-appreciated in New Zealand, and treatments need to be refocused from correcting refractive error to preventing axial length elongation. METHODS: The Wilson and Jungner criteria was used to assess the validity of screening for myopia in New Zealand through review of the latest evidence relevant to each point within the criteria. RESULTS: We found that the screening for myopia in New Zealand met 7 out of 10 of the Wilson and Jungner criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The concept of a screening programme for myopia in New Zealand performed relatively well, and should be considered further. Further randomised clinical trials, which clearly identify the appropriate treatment modalities and timing, would allow the establishment of robust New Zealand specific myopia management guidelines. We would then suggest a trial of a screening programme in New Zealand setting to assess real-world feasibility and cost-effectiveness to identify early myopia and provide treatment to slow progression. Adjustments could be made to the already available screening programme, consisting of suitable reduction of screening age, and introduction of autorefractors.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 16
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Monitoring the performance of New Zealand's National Cervical Screening Programme through data linkage
    Lewis, Hazel
    Yeh, Li-Chia
    Almendral, Bobby
    Neal, Harold
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 122 (1305) : 15 - 25
  • [22] Does quality of life really matter in a screening programme?
    Earnshaw, Jonothan J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 57 (04) : 597 - 597
  • [23] Does individual programme size affect screening performance? Results from the United Kingdom NHS breast screening programme
    Blanks, RG
    Bennett, RL
    Wallis, MG
    Moss, SM
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2002, 9 (01) : 11 - 14
  • [24] Screening of newborn infants for cholestatic hepatobiliary disease - Does test fufil screening criteria?
    Linnane, E
    Paul, A
    Parry, R
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7222): : 1435 - 1436
  • [25] Screening for diabetes with the new diagnostic criteria and proposed screening methods.
    De Bellis, A
    Mannucci, E
    Rotella, CM
    Velussi, M
    DIABETOLOGIA, 1998, 41 : A121 - A121
  • [26] Assessing efficiency in the UK breast screening programme: does size of screening unit make a difference?
    Johnston, K
    Gerard, K
    HEALTH POLICY, 2001, 56 (01) : 21 - 32
  • [28] HIV screening in New Zealand: time for a change
    Gow, Nick
    Briggs, Simon
    Gilmour, Judy
    Handy, Rupert
    Henley, Rebecca
    Ingram, Joan
    Kenedi, Chris
    Lowe, Michele
    Mundt, Susan
    Nisbet, Mitzi
    Ritchie, Stephen
    Thomas, Mark
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 126 (1382) : 134 - 136
  • [29] PROGRESS IN CERVICAL SCREENING IN NEW-ZEALAND
    STRATON, J
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 107 (981) : 261 - 262
  • [30] ANTITUMOR SCREENING OF NEW ZEALAND PLANT EXTRACTS
    BURTON, JF
    CAIN, BF
    ACTA UNIO INTERNATIONALIS CONTRA CANCRUM, 1959, 15 (01) : 75 - 75