Coupling Structural Decomposition Analysis and Sensitivity Analysis to Investigate CO2 Emission Intensity in China

被引:4
|
作者
Li, Ling [1 ]
Tang, Ling [2 ]
Zhang, Junrong [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Capital Univ Econ & Business, Int Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China
[2] Beihang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Acad Math & Syst Sci, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CO2 emission intensity; Structural decomposition analysis; SDA; Sensitivity analysis; Input-output model; China; INPUT-OUTPUT-ANALYSIS; CARBON EMISSIONS; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; DRIVING FORCES; TRADING SCHEME; PERFORMANCE; DRIVERS; EXPORTS; IMPACT; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.3390/en12122396
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
A coupled structural decomposition analysis (SDA) and sensitivity analysis approach is developed to explore the drivers of China's CO2 emission intensity at both general and sectoral levels and from both ex-post and ex-ante perspectives. Two steps are involved-structural decomposition and sensitivity analysis. First, the popular factor decomposition method, SDA, is implemented to identify which drivers have made the largest contribution to emission intensity changes. Second, an emerging ex-ante approach, sensitivity analysis, is introduced to answer how and to what extent such drivers will influence future emission intensity at a sectoral level. Based on China's input-output tables for 1997-2012, the empirical study provides a hotspot map of China's energy system. (1) Direct-emission coefficient and technology coefficient are observed as the top two overall drivers. (2) For the former, reducing direct-emission coefficient in an emission-intensity sector (e.g., electricity and heat sectors) by 1% will mitigate China's total emission intensity by at least 0.05%. (3) For the latter, future emission intensity is super-sensitive to direct transactions in emission-intensity sectors (particularly the chemical industry with elasticities up to 0.82%).
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Analysis on the Factors of CO2 Emission in Households Sector in China
    Wang, Yan
    Cai, Yuanyuan
    Zhang, Hua
    ADVANCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, PTS 1-6, 2012, 518-523 : 5221 - 5231
  • [22] An analysis of the difference in CO2 emission intensity between Finland and Sweden
    Sun, JW
    ENERGY, 2000, 25 (11) : 1139 - 1146
  • [23] CO2 emission from energy use in India:: a decomposition analysis
    Paul, S
    Bhattacharya, RN
    ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (05) : 585 - 593
  • [24] Decomposition analysis of CO2 emission in ASEAN: an extended IPAT model
    Chontanawat, Jaruwan
    5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH (ICEER 2018), 2018, 153 : 186 - 190
  • [25] Exploring sources of China's CO2 emission: Decomposition analysis under different technology changes
    Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki
    Li, Aijun
    Liu, Xiaohong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 279 (03) : 984 - 995
  • [26] A Structure Decomposition Analysis of China’s Production-Source CO2 Emission: 1992–2002
    Huanbo Zhang
    Ye Qi
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2011, 49 : 65 - 77
  • [27] A spatio-temporal decomposition analysis of energy-related CO2 emission growth in China
    Chen, Liang
    Yang, Zhifeng
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 103 : 49 - 60
  • [28] Multi-country comparisons of CO2 emission intensity: The production-theoretical decomposition analysis approach
    Wang, H.
    Zhou, P.
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2018, 74 : 310 - 320
  • [29] Comparative analysis of CO2 emission linkages of construction between China and the United States using structural path analysis
    Yezhen Lai
    Yu Song
    Scientific Reports, 14 (1)
  • [30] Are structural change and modernisation leading to convergence in the CO2 economy? Decomposition analysis of China, EU and USA
    Kaivo-oja, J.
    Luukkanen, J.
    Panula-Ontto, J.
    Vehmas, J.
    Chen, Y.
    Mikkonen, S.
    Auffermann, B.
    ENERGY, 2014, 72 : 115 - 125