Automatic penalty continuation in structural topology optimization

被引:37
|
作者
Rojas-Labanda, Susana [1 ]
Stolpe, Mathias [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Wind Energy, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
关键词
Topology optimization; Continuation methods; Benchmarking; Mechanism design; Minimum compliance; ALGORITHM; FILTERS; SIMP;
D O I
10.1007/s00158-015-1277-1
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Structural topology optimization problems are often modelled using material interpolation schemes to produce almost solid-and-void designs. The problems become non convex due to the use of these techniques. Several articles introduce continuation approaches in the material penalization parameter to reduce the risks of ending in local minima. However, the numerical performance of continuation methods has not been studied in detail. The first purpose of this article is to benchmark existing continuation methods and the classical formulation with fixed penalty parameter in structural topology optimization. This is done using performance profiles on 225 minimum compliance and 150 compliant mechanism design problems. The results show that continuation methods generally find better designs. On the other hand, they typically require a larger number of iterations. In the second part of the article this issue is addressed. We propose an automatic continuation method, where the material penalization parameter is included as a new variable in the problem and a constraint guarantees that the requested penalty is eventually reached. The numerical results suggest that this approach is an appealing alternative to continuation methods. Automatic continuation also generally obtains better designs than the classical formulation using a reduced number of iterations.
引用
收藏
页码:1205 / 1221
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Benchmarking optimization solvers for structural topology optimization
    Rojas-Labanda, Susana
    Stolpe, Mathias
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2015, 52 (03) : 527 - 547
  • [32] Benchmarking optimization solvers for structural topology optimization
    Susana Rojas-Labanda
    Mathias Stolpe
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2015, 52 : 527 - 547
  • [33] OptiNET-Automatic Network Topology Optimization
    Maniatopoulos, Andreas
    Alvanaki, Paraskevi
    Mitianoudis, Nikolaos
    INFORMATION, 2022, 13 (09)
  • [34] AuTO: A framework for automatic differentiation in topology optimization
    Chandrasekhar, Aaditya
    Sridhara, Saketh
    Suresh, Krishnan
    arXiv, 2021,
  • [35] AuTO: a framework for Automatic differentiation in Topology Optimization
    Aaditya Chandrasekhar
    Saketh Sridhara
    Krishnan Suresh
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2021, 64 : 4355 - 4365
  • [36] Automatic Topology Optimization for FPGA Interconnect Synthesis
    Rodionov, Alex
    Rose, Jonathan
    2018 28TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FIELD PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC AND APPLICATIONS (FPL), 2018, : 30 - 34
  • [37] AuTO: a framework for Automatic differentiation in Topology Optimization
    Chandrasekhar, Aaditya
    Sridhara, Saketh
    Suresh, Krishnan
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2021, 64 (06) : 4355 - 4365
  • [38] Automatic topology optimization for analog module generators
    Wolf, M
    Kleine, U
    DESIGN, AUTOMATION AND TEST IN EUROPE, PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 961 - 962
  • [39] A fully automatic computational framework for beam structure design from continuum structural topology optimization
    Chao Ma
    Na Qiu
    Xiang Xu
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2023, 66
  • [40] A fully automatic computational framework for beam structure design from continuum structural topology optimization
    Ma, Chao
    Qiu, Na
    Xu, Xiang
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2023, 66 (12)