Utilizing Machine Learning and Automated Performance Metrics to Evaluate Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performance and Predict Outcomes

被引:113
|
作者
Hung, Andrew J. [1 ]
Chen, Jian [1 ]
Che, Zhengping [2 ]
Nilanon, Tanachat [2 ]
Jarc, Anthony [3 ]
Titus, Micha [1 ]
Oh, Paul J. [1 ]
Gill, Inderbir S. [1 ]
Liu, Yan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, USC Inst Urol, Ctr Robot Simulat & Educ, Catherine & Joseph Aresty Dept Urol, 1441 Eastlake Ave,Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Viterbi Sch Engn, USC Machine Learning Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Intuit Surg Inc, Med Res, Norcross, GA USA
关键词
artificial intelligence; robotic surgical procedures; prostate neoplasms; education; COMPETENCE EVALUATION; SURGICAL SKILLS; VALIDATION; SURGERY; TOOL;
D O I
10.1089/end.2018.0035
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Surgical performance is critical for clinical outcomes. We present a novel machine learning (ML) method of processing automated performance metrics (APMs) to evaluate surgical performance and predict clinical outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Materials and Methods: We trained three ML algorithms utilizing APMs directly from robot system data (training material) and hospital length of stay (LOS; training label) (<= 2 days and >2 days) from 78 RARP cases, and selected the algorithm with the best performance. The selected algorithm categorized the cases as "Predicted as expected LOS (pExp-LOS)" and "Predicted as extended LOS (pExt-LOS)." We compared postoperative outcomes of the two groups (Kruskal-Wallis/Fisher's exact tests). The algorithm then predicted individual clinical outcomes, which we compared with actual outcomes (Spearman's correlation/Fisher's exact tests). Finally, we identified five most relevant APMs adopted by the algorithm during predicting. Results: The "Random Forest-50" (RF-50) algorithm had the best performance, reaching 87.2% accuracy in predicting LOS (73 cases as "pExp-LOS" and 5 cases as "pExt-LOS"). The "pExp-LOS" cases outperformed the "pExt-LOS" cases in surgery time (3.7 hours vs 4.6 hours, p=0.007), LOS (2 days vs 4 days, p=0.02), and Foley duration (9 days vs 14 days, p=0.02). Patient outcomes predicted by the algorithm had significant association with the ground truth in surgery time (p<0.001, r=0.73), LOS (p=0.05, r=0.52), and Foley duration (p<0.001, r=0.45). The five most relevant APMs, adopted by the RF-50 algorithm in predicting, were largely related to camera manipulation. Conclusion: To our knowledge, ours is the first study to show that APMs and ML algorithms may help assess surgical RARP performance and predict clinical outcomes. With further accrual of clinical data (oncologic and functional data), this process will become increasingly relevant and valuable in surgical assessment and training.
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 444
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Use of cumulative summation (CUSUM) as a tool for early feedback and monitoring in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy outcomes and performance
    Chan, Garson
    Pautler, Stephen E.
    [J]. CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2019, 13 (02): : 53 - 58
  • [43] Effect of surgeon experience and bony pelvic dimensions on surgical performance and patient outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Chen, Jian
    Chu, Tiffany
    Ghodoussipour, Saum
    Bowman, Sean
    Patel, Heetabh
    King, Kevin
    Hung, Andrew J.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 124 (05) : 828 - 835
  • [44] Improved Outcomes Utilizing a Valveless-Trocar System during Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP)
    Shahait, Mohammed
    Cockrell, Ross
    Yezdani, Mona
    Yu, Sue-Jean
    Lee, Alexandra
    McWilliams, Kellie
    Lee, David, I
    [J]. JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2019, 23 (01)
  • [45] Review of automated performance metrics to assess surgical technical skills in robot-assisted laparoscopy
    Sonia Guerin
    Arnaud Huaulmé
    Vincent Lavoue
    Pierre Jannin
    Krystel Nyangoh Timoh
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2022, 36 : 853 - 870
  • [46] Review of automated performance metrics to assess surgical technical skills in robot-assisted laparoscopy
    Guerin, Sonia
    Huaulme, Arnaud
    Lavoue, Vincent
    Jannin, Pierre
    Timoh, Krystel Nyangoh
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (02): : 853 - 870
  • [47] Outcomes of Salvage Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy After Focal Ablation for Prostate Cancer in Comparison to Primary Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Matched Analysis
    Bhat, K. R. Seetharam
    Moschovas, Marcio Covas
    Sandri, Marco
    Noel, Jonathan
    Reddy, Sunil
    Perera, Roshane
    Rogers, Travis
    Roof, Shannon
    Patel, Vipul R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2022, 8 (05): : 1192 - 1197
  • [48] IMPACT OF PROSTATE WEIGHT ON ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY OUTCOMES
    Munver, Ravi
    Rankin, James
    Yates, Jennifer
    Jain, Samay
    Nyirenda, Themba
    Sawczuk, Ihor S.
    Shin, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A170 - A171
  • [49] Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy by Lateral Approach: Technique, Reproducibility and Outcomes
    Socarras, Moises Rodriguez
    Rivas, Juan Gomez
    Elbers, Javier Reinoso
    Esposito, Fabio
    Gonzalez, Luis Llanes
    Monsalve, Diego M. Carrion
    Del Alamo, Julio Fernandez
    Grana, Sonia Ruiz
    Varela, Jorge Juarez
    Coria, Daniel
    Rivera, Vanesa Cuadros
    Gaston, Richard
    Sancha, Fernando Gomez
    [J]. CANCERS, 2023, 15 (22)
  • [50] ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: THE LARGEST RUSSIAN EXPERIENCE AND PENTAFECTA OUTCOMES
    Pushkar, D.
    Kolontarev, K.
    Govorov, A.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 : 51 - 52