Isolating the Atmospheric Circulation Response to Arctic Sea Ice Loss in the Coupled Climate System

被引:89
|
作者
Blackport, Russell [1 ]
Kushner, Paul J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Phys, 100 Coll St, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
NORTH-ATLANTIC SST; WINTER CIRCULATION; HEAT-TRANSPORT; AMPLIFICATION; ANOMALIES; IMPACT; MODEL; CCM3;
D O I
10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0257.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
In this study, coupled ocean-atmosphere-land-sea ice Earth system model (ESM) simulations driven separately by sea ice albedo reduction and by projected greenhouse-dominated radiative forcing are combined to cleanly isolate the sea ice loss response of the atmospheric circulation. A pattern scaling approach is proposed in which the local multidecadal mean atmospheric response is assumed to be separately proportional to the total sea ice loss and to the total low-latitude ocean surface warming. The proposed approach estimates the response to Arctic sea ice loss with low-latitude ocean temperatures fixed and vice versa. The sea ice response includes a high northern latitude easterly zonal wind response, an equatorward shift of the eddy-driven jet, a weakening of the stratospheric polar vortex, an anticyclonic sea level pressure anomaly over coastal Eurasia, a cyclonic sea level pressure anomaly over the North Pacific, and increased wintertime precipitation over the west coast of North America. Many of these responses are opposed by the response to low-latitude surface warming with sea ice fixed. However, both sea ice loss and low-latitude surface warming act in concert to reduce subseasonal temperature variability throughout the middle and high latitudes. The responses are similar in two related versions of the National Center for Atmospheric Research Earth system models, apart from the stratospheric polar vortex response. Evidence is presented that internal variability can easily contaminate the estimates if not enough independent climate states are used to construct them.
引用
收藏
页码:2163 / 2185
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reassessing Sea Ice Drift and Its Relationship to Long-Term Arctic Sea Ice Loss in Coupled Climate Models
    Tandon, Neil F.
    Kushner, Paul J.
    Docquier, David
    Wettstein, Justin J.
    Li, Camille
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2018, 123 (06) : 4338 - 4359
  • [42] The atmospheric response to sea-ice loss
    Yannick Peings
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2018, 8 : 664 - 665
  • [43] Arctic sea ice variability in the context of recent atmospheric circulation trends
    Deser, C
    Walsh, JE
    Timlin, MS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2000, 13 (03) : 617 - 633
  • [44] The atmospheric response to sea-ice loss
    Peings, Yannick
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2018, 8 (08) : 664 - 665
  • [45] Persistent impact of winter atmospheric circulation anomalies on Arctic sea ice
    Cai, Lei
    Alexeev, Vladimir A.
    Zhang, Jinlun
    Walsh, John E.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 5 (10):
  • [46] Predictability of Arctic sea ice drift in coupled climate models
    Reifenberg, Simon Felix
    Goessling, Helge Friedrich
    [J]. CRYOSPHERE, 2022, 16 (07): : 2927 - 2946
  • [47] Arctic sea ice response to atmospheric forcings with varying levels of anthropogenic warming and climate variability
    Zhang, Jinlun
    Steele, Michael
    Schweiger, Axel
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2010, 37
  • [48] Atmospheric River Response to Arctic Sea Ice Loss in the Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project
    Ma, Weiming
    Chen, Gang
    Peings, Yannick
    Alviz, Noah
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 48 (20)
  • [49] The response of atmospheric blocking and East Asian cold extremes to future Arctic Sea ice loss
    Zhuo, Wenqin
    Yao, Yao
    Luo, Dehai
    Huang, Fei
    Luo, Binhe
    Zhong, Linhao
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2024, 304
  • [50] The Effect of QBO Phase on the Atmospheric Response to Projected Arctic Sea Ice Loss in Early Winter
    Labe, Zachary
    Peings, Yannick
    Magnusdottir, Gudrun
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 46 (13) : 7663 - 7671