Compatibility of a Magnetic Position Tracker with a Cochlear Implant System

被引:0
|
作者
Kerber, Stefan [1 ]
Seeber, Bernhard U. [1 ]
机构
[1] MRC, Inst Hearing Res, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
来源
EAR AND HEARING | 2009年 / 30卷 / 03期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
LOCALIZATION;
D O I
10.1097/AUD.0b013e31819e69f1
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study was to reveal possible interspersion of a magnetic position tracking device into a cochlear implant system, which could lead to harmful signals on the implanted electrode. Design: Signals at the output of the speech processor's compression stage and at the implant's electrode were recorded and analyzed for unwanted distortion or corrupted pulses related to the presence of the magnetic tracking device. Results: No systematic impact of a Polhemus Liberty Latus magnetic tracking system on the output signals of an Advanced Bionics HiRes90k cochlear implant and Platinum Series speech processor was found. Conclusions: The results suggest no objections for using the Polhemus Liberty Latus magnetic position tracker with the Advanced Bionics Platinum series speech processor and HiRes90k cochlear implant in research, for example, on spatial hearing. This result is likely transferable to other cochlear implants because (i) all manufacturers adhere to equally high electromagnetic interference standards and (ii) electromagnetic signals used by the transmission links of current cochlear implants and trackers differ in frequency by roughly 2 decades, making interference unlikely.
引用
收藏
页码:380 / 383
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Remote Fitting of Cochlear Implant System
    Wasowski, Arkadiusz
    Lorens, Artur
    Skarzynski, Henryk
    Obrycka, Anita
    Walkowiak, Adam
    IMETI 2008: INTERNATIONAL MULTI-CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION, VOL II, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 291 - 291
  • [22] SYSTEM-DESIGN OF A COCHLEAR IMPLANT
    WHITE, RL
    IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY MAGAZINE, 1987, 6 (02): : 42 - 46
  • [23] Computerized cochlear implant database system
    Ray, J
    Gray, RF
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2000, 114 (10): : 741 - 745
  • [24] William House Cochlear Implant Study Group - Position statement on bilateral cochlear implantation
    Balkany, Thomas
    Hodges, Anelle
    Telischi, Fred
    Hoffman, Ronald
    Madell, Jane
    Parisier, Simon
    Gantz, Bruce
    Tyler, Richard
    Peters, Robert
    Litovsky, Ruth
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2008, 29 (02) : 107 - 108
  • [25] Impact of microphone position on sound localization in cochlear implant users
    Bandeira, Mariana
    Baumann, Uwe
    Weissgerber, Tobias
    LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2018, 97 (02) : 92 - 99
  • [26] Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Receiver Position and Its Temporal Changes
    Grupe, Gloria
    Rademacher, Grit
    Hofmann, Solvig
    Stratmann, Andreas
    Mittmann, Philipp
    Mutze, Sven
    Ernst, Arneborg
    Todt, Ingo
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2017, 38 (10) : E558 - E562
  • [27] Development of Insertion Models Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Position
    van der Marel, Kim S.
    Briaire, Jeroen J.
    Wolterbeek, Ron
    Verbist, Berit M.
    Frijns, Johan H. M.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2016, 37 (04): : 473 - 482
  • [28] Word Recognition with a Cochlear Implant in Relation to Prediction and Electrode Position
    Franke-Trieger, Annett
    Lailach, Susen
    Shetty, Joshua
    Murrmann, Katrin
    Zahnert, Thomas
    Neudert, Marcus
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [29] Cochlear implant user perceptions of magnetic resonance imaging
    Dewey, R. S.
    Kitterick, P. T.
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 23 (01) : 11 - 20
  • [30] Magnetic resonance imaging and cochlear implants: Compatibility and safety aspects
    Teissl, C
    Kremser, C
    Hochmair, ES
    Hochmair-Desoyer, IJ
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1999, 9 (01) : 26 - 38