Discretion and fairness in airport security screening

被引:10
|
作者
Lum, Cynthia [1 ]
Crafton, Peter Zachary [1 ]
Parsons, Rebecca [1 ]
Beech, Dale [1 ]
Smarr, Tarren [1 ]
Connors, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] George Mason Univ, Ctr Evidence Based Crime Policy, Dept Criminol Law & Soc, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
关键词
airport security; counterterrorism; TSA; procedural justice; policing; search; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; SITUATIONAL DETERMINANTS; TRAFFIC STOPS; POLICE; BLACK; SATISFACTION; LEGITIMACY; CITIZENS; RACE;
D O I
10.1057/sj.2012.51
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This study reports the findings of a field survey asking more than 500 passengers at a large East Coast international airport about their experiences while going through airport security. Although existing research shows that metal detectors and baggage screening can be effective in reducing the likelihood of violence at airports and on planes, the fairness of such procedures has yet to be fully examined. While all passengers must be screened, there can also be discretion in airport security regarding whether passengers receive additional screening and how they perceive they are being treated. Findings indicate differences between racial groups and treatment, with nonwhites more likely to receive additional screening, have more items confiscated, feel embarrassed, and less likely to be provided an explanation for searches. Policy recommendations are suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:352 / 373
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Airport perimeter security
    Anon
    Airport Forum, 1990, 20 (03):
  • [42] Liberty, Security, and Fairness
    Cullity, Garrett
    JOURNAL OF ETHICS, 2021, 25 (02): : 141 - 159
  • [43] Liberty, Security, and Fairness
    Garrett Cullity
    The Journal of Ethics, 2021, 25 : 141 - 159
  • [44] Fairness perspectives of airport residents: A qualitative approach
    Hauptvogel, Dominik
    Kuhlmann, Julia
    Richard, Isabelle
    Emanuely, Camille
    Schreckenberg, Dirk
    Quehl, Julia
    Rothmund, Tobias
    Bartels, Susanne
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH INTERDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVES, 2024, 27
  • [45] SCREENING AND 'FRISK SEARCHES' AS PART OF AIRPORT SECURITY: MATTERS OF CHOICE? THE NEED FOR 'CHECKS AND BALANCES' IN AVIATION SECURITY LEGISLATION
    Heilbronn, Gary N.
    QUT LAW REVIEW, 2007, 7 (02): : 209 - 233
  • [46] Managing Pandemics in Airport Security Environments: A Comparative Analysis of Classic Airport Security and Smart Security Approaches
    Vizitiu, Vlad
    Henning, Raul
    Dragomir, Mihai
    ADVANCES IN MANUFACTURING IV, VOL 1, MANUFACTURING 2024, 2024, : 312 - 324
  • [47] Hold baggage security screening system in Kuwait International Airport using Arena software
    AlKheder, Sharaf
    Alomair, Abdullah
    Aladwani, Bader
    AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2020, 11 (03) : 687 - 696
  • [48] Going beyond Ascribed Identities: The Importance of Procedural Justice in Airport Security Screening in Israel
    Hasisi, Badi
    Weisburd, David
    LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW, 2011, 45 (04) : 867 - 892
  • [49] THE USE OF E-PASSPORTS FOR INBOUND AIRPORT BORDER SECURITY SCREENING: THE PASSENGER PERSPECTIVE
    Kneale, David K.
    Baxter, Glenn S.
    Wild, Graham
    AVIATION, 2014, 18 (04) : 193 - 202
  • [50] Design of airport security screening using queueing theory augmented with particle swarm optimisation
    Mohamad Naji
    Ali Braytee
    Ahmed Al-Ani
    Ali Anaissi
    Madhu Goyal
    Paul J. Kennedy
    Service Oriented Computing and Applications, 2020, 14 : 119 - 133