Performance-based engineering and multi-criteria decision analysis for sustainable and resilient building design

被引:46
|
作者
Mosalam, Khalid M. [1 ]
Alibrandi, Umberto [2 ]
Lee, Hyerin [3 ]
Armengou, Jaume [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Pacific Earthquake Engn Res PEER Ctr, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 723 Davis Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] BEARS, CREATE Tower,1 Create Way,11-02, Singapore 138062, Singapore
[3] Chungbuk Natl Univ, Dept Disaster Prevent Engn, 1 Chtmgdae Ro, Cheongju 28644, South Korea
[4] Univ Int Catalunya, Acad Org & Int Relat, Sch Architecture, 22 Immaculada St, Barcelona 08021, Spain
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Building holistic design; Decision making; Energy-efficiency; First-order reliability method; Multi-criteria decision analysis; Performance-based engineering; PROSPECT-THEORY;
D O I
10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.03.005
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this paper, an integrated approach for a holistic (involving notions of resiliency and sustainability) building design is presented to select the optimal design alternative based on multiple conflicting criteria using the multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT). A probabilistic formulation of MAUT is proposed, where the distributions of the uncertain parameters are determined by a performance-based engineering (PBE) approach. Here PBE is used to evaluate the building energy efficiency and sustainability in addition to structural safety. In the proposed framework, different design alternatives of a building are ranked based on the generalized expected utility, which is able to include the most adopted probabilistic decision models, like the expected utility and the cumulative prospect theory. The distributions of the utilities are obtained from the first-order reliability method to provide (i) good tradeoff between accuracy and efficiency, and (ii) rational decision making by evaluating the most critical realizations of the consequences of each alternative through the design point. The application of the proposed approach to a building shows that design for resilience may imply design for sustainability and that green buildings (alone) may be not resilient in the face of extreme events.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sustainable Design Building Evaluation Based on Multi-Criteria Methods
    Kamionka, Lucjan W.
    [J]. 5TH WORLD MULTIDISCIPLINARY CIVIL ENGINEERING-ARCHITECTURE-URBAN PLANNING SYMPOSIUM (WMCAUS), 2020, 960
  • [2] An interactive multi-criteria decision-making method for building performance design
    Han, Zhen
    Li, Xiaoqian
    Sun, Jiaqi
    Wang, Mo
    Liu, Gang
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2023, 282
  • [3] Preface to the special issue on "Seismic performance-based design for resilient and sustainable slope engineering"
    Huang, Yu
    Sun, Jin
    Moriguchi, Shuji
    [J]. ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2020, 272
  • [4] Novel perspective of seismic performance-based evaluation and design for resilient and sustainable slope engineering
    Xiong, Min
    Huang, Yu
    [J]. ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2019, 262
  • [5] Review on multi-criteria decision analysis in sustainable manufacturing decision making
    Jamwal, Anbesh
    Agrawal, Rajeev
    Sharma, Monica
    Kumar, Vikas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING, 2021, 14 (03) : 202 - 225
  • [6] Sustainable Development Goals: A Regional Overview Based on Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    D'Adamo, Idiano
    Gastaldi, Massimo
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (15)
  • [7] An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection
    Ahmadreza Afrasiabi
    Madjid Tavana
    Debora Di Caprio
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 37291 - 37314
  • [8] An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection
    Afrasiabi, Ahmadreza
    Tavana, Madjid
    Di Caprio, Debora
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (25) : 37291 - 37314
  • [9] LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS OF A SUSTAINABLE BUILDING, APLYING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHOD
    Medineckiene, Milena
    Turskis, Zenonas
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-3, 2011, : 957 - 961
  • [10] Multi-criteria decision analysis to select metrics for design and monitoring of sustainable ecosystem restorations
    Convertino, M.
    Baker, K. M.
    Vogel, J. T.
    Lu, C.
    Suedel, B.
    Linkov, I.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2013, 26 : 76 - 86