Prostate Cancer Screening in Brazil: a single center experience in the public health system

被引:0
|
作者
Rosa de Oliveira, Renato Almeida [1 ,2 ]
Guimaraes, Gustavo Cardoso [3 ]
Mourao, Thiago Camelo [1 ]
Favaretto, Ricardo de Lima [1 ]
Santana, Thiago Borges Marques [1 ,2 ]
Lopes, Ademar [4 ]
Zequi, Stenio de Cassio [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Beneficencia Portuguesa Sao Paulo, Dept Urooncol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] AC Camargo Canc Ctr, Div Urol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Hosp Beneficencia Portuguesa Sao Paulo, Serv Oncol Cirurg, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[4] AC Camargo Canc Ctr, Serv Cirurgia Pelv, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
来源
INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL | 2021年 / 47卷 / 03期
关键词
Prostate cancer; familial [Supplementary Concept; Mass Screening; Therapeutics; UNITED-STATES; MORTALITY; RECOMMENDATION; AGE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; RISK;
D O I
10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0392
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Incidence and mortality of prostate cancer (PCa) are still increasing in developing countries. Limited access to the health system or more aggressive disease are potential reasons for this. Ethnic and social differences in developed countries seem to make inappropriate to extrapolate data from other centers. We aim to report the epidemiological profile of a PSA-screened population from a cancer center in Brazil. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively selected 9.692 men enrolled in a PCa prevention program, comprising total PSA level and digital rectal examination at the first appointment, associated with complementary tests when necessary. Men aged over 40 years-old were included after shared decision-making process. Prostate biopsy (TRUS) was performed when clinically suspected for PCa. After the diagnosis, patients underwent appropriate treatment. Results: TRUS was performed in 5.5% of men and PCa incidence was 2.6%. Overall ratio between number of patients who needed to be screened in order to diagnose one cancer was 38.9 patients, with 2.1 biopsies performed to diagnose a cancer. Positive predictive value (PPV) of TRUS biopsy in this strategy was 47.2%, varying from 38.5% (<50 years-old) to 60% (>80 years-old). We evidenced 70 patients (27.9%) classified as low risk tumors, 74 (29.5%) as intermediate risk, and 107 (42.6%) as high-risk disease. Conclusions: PSA-screening remains controversial in literature. In front of a huge miscegenated people and considering the big proportion of high-risk PCa, even in young men diagnosed with the disease, it is imperative to inform patients and health providers about these data particularities in Brazil.
引用
收藏
页码:558 / 565
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The benefits of cancer screening in kidney transplant recipients: a single-center experience
    Kato, Taigo
    Kakuta, Yoichi
    Abe, Toyofumi
    Yamanaka, Kazuaki
    Imamura, Ryoichi
    Okumi, Masayoshi
    Ichimaru, Naotsugu
    Takahara, Shiro
    Nonomura, Norio
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2016, 5 (02): : 153 - 158
  • [32] Screening for aggressive prostate cancer: A single-center experience using the 4Kscore and multiparametric MRI for the detection of Gleason 7 or higher prostate cancer.
    Venkatramani, Vivek
    Nahar, Bruno
    Koru-Sengul, Tulay
    Soodana-Prakash, Nachiketh
    Gonzalgo, Mark L.
    Ritch, Chad
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (06)
  • [33] Lynch syndrome screening in endometrial cancer patients with immunohistochemistry: A single center experience
    Vargas, Roberto
    Rauh-Hain, J. Alejandro
    Iafrate, Anthony John
    Chung, Daniel
    Ellisen, Leif
    Shannon, Kristen
    Rodgers, Linda
    Oliva, Esther
    Schorge, John
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 136 (02) : 407 - 407
  • [34] Prostate imaging-reporting and data system version 2 in combination with clinical parameters for prostate cancer detection: a single center experience
    Wang, Lei
    Luo, Yi
    Liu, Tongzu
    Deng, Ming
    Huang, Xing
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2023, 55 (07) : 1659 - 1664
  • [35] Prostate imaging-reporting and data system version 2 in combination with clinical parameters for prostate cancer detection: a single center experience
    Lei Wang
    Yi Luo
    Tongzu Liu
    Ming Deng
    Xing Huang
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2023, 55 : 1659 - 1664
  • [36] PUBLIC-HEALTH PERSPECTIVE - THE HEALTH-POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF SCREENING FOR PROSTATE-CANCER
    WOOLF, SH
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (05): : 1685 - 1688
  • [37] Breast cancer screening in Brazil. Barriers related to the health system
    da Costa Vieira, Rene Aloisio
    Formenton, Alessandro
    Bertolini, Silvia Regina
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2017, 63 (05): : 466 - 474
  • [38] Addressing prostate cancer disparities through precision public health: The CaPTC experience
    Odedina, Folakemi
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2020, 29 (06)
  • [39] Trends in breast cancer surgery at Brazil's public health system
    Freitas-Junior, Ruffo
    Gagliato, Debora Melo
    Cabral Moura Filho, Joao Wesley
    Gouveia, Pollyana Alves
    Sousa Rahal, Rosemar Macedo
    Paulinelli, Regis Resende
    Padua Oliveira, Luis Fernando
    Freitas, Paola Ferreira
    Martins, Edesio
    Urban, Cicero
    Murta Lucena, Clecio Enio
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 115 (05) : 544 - 549
  • [40] The Impact of Recent Screening Recommendations on Prostate Cancer Screening in a Large Health Care System
    Aslani, Afshin
    Minnillo, Brian J.
    Johnson, Ben
    Cherullo, Edward E.
    Ponsky, Lee E.
    Abouassaly, Robert
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (06): : 1737 - 1742