Auditor Specialization, Auditor Dominance, and Audit Fees: The Role of Investment Opportunities

被引:73
|
作者
Cahan, Steven E. [1 ]
Godfrey, Jayne M. [2 ]
Hamilton, Jane [3 ]
Jeter, Debra C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Auckland 1, New Zealand
[2] Monash Univ, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[3] La Trobe Univ, Bundoora, Vic 3086, Australia
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Nashville, TN USA
来源
ACCOUNTING REVIEW | 2008年 / 83卷 / 06期
关键词
auditor specialization; auditor dominance; audit fees; investment opportunities; auditor concentration;
D O I
10.2308/accr.2008.83.6.1393
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
A report issued by the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) in 2003 identified auditors' industry expertise as a critical factor for firms choosing an auditor, and highlighted the extreme levels of auditor concentration in some industries. We posit that the investment opportunity set (IOS) plays a fundamental role in determining whether an industry is an attractive target for auditor specialization. When industry-specific IOS is high, specialist auditors make costly investments in industry-specific knowledge, allowing them to offer a differentiated product and to create entry barriers for other audit firms. When the IOS of firms within an industry is relatively homogeneous, auditors can transfer such knowledge across clients in the industry more easily, resulting in cost savings and scale economies. However, greater homogeneity of IOS in an industry can also increase a client's aversion to sharing an auditor with its competitors because of concerns about transfers of proprietary information, suggesting that industries with relatively homogeneous IOS are less likely to be dominated by a single auditor. We show that auditor concentration in an industry relates positively to both the level and homogeneity of IOS in the industry, while auditor dominance relates negatively to industry IOS homogeneity. Further, we find that audit fees are positively associated with both levels and homogeneity of industry IOS.
引用
收藏
页码:1393 / 1423
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Audit Fees and the Large Auditor Premium in the Italian Market
    Cameran, Mara
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDITING, 2005, 9 (02) : 129 - 146
  • [22] The influence of auditor and auditee on mandatory audit fees in France
    Ben Larbi, Sami
    Mandzila, Eustache Ebondo Wa
    Meniaoui, Jihene
    Moor, Ernesto Tapia
    [J]. GECONTEC-REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE GESTION DEL CONOCIMIENTO Y LA TECNOLOGIA, 2024, 12 (01): : 77 - 102
  • [23] MD&A readability, auditor characteristics, and audit fees
    Wang, Le
    Chen, Xiaoyan
    Li, Xing
    Tian, Gaoliang
    [J]. ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2021, 61 (04): : 5025 - 5050
  • [24] The Impact of Board Interlocks on Auditor Choice and Audit Fees
    Johansen, Thomas Riise
    Pettersson, Kim
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2013, 21 (03) : 287 - 310
  • [25] Issues in Examining the Effect of Auditor Litigation on Audit Fees
    Minutti-Meza, Miguel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2014, 52 (02) : 341 - 356
  • [26] The Auditor Industry Specialization, Negotiation Ability and Audit Fee
    Guo, Dan
    Liu, Hui
    Tian, Xue
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-COMMERCE AND CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (ECED 2014), 2014, : 189 - 193
  • [27] Does Auditor Industry Specialization Improve Audit Quality?
    Minutti-Meza, Miguel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2013, 51 (04) : 779 - 817
  • [28] Audit market concentration and auditor's industry specialization
    Ishak, Aniza Marzita
    Mansor, Nooriha
    Maruhun, Enny Nurdin Sutan
    [J]. PSU-USM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2013, 91 : 48 - 56
  • [29] THE PROVISION OF NON-AUDIT SERVICES, AUDIT FEES AND AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE
    Ahmad, Ayoib Che
    Shafie, Rohami
    Yusof, Nor Zalina Mohamad
    [J]. ASIAN ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2006, 2 (01): : 21 - 40
  • [30] Auditor tenure, auditor specialization, and information asymmetry
    Almutairi, Ali R.
    Dunn, Kimberly A.
    Skantz, Terrance
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2009, 24 (07) : 600 - +