The freezing method of cleavage stage embryos has no impact on the weight of the newborns

被引:15
|
作者
Kaartinen, N. [1 ]
Kananen, K. [2 ]
Huhtala, H. [3 ]
Keranen, S. [4 ]
Tinkanen, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tampere, Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Teiskontie 35, Tampere 33521, Finland
[2] Infertil Clin Ovumia, Biokatu 12, Tampere 33520, Finland
[3] Tampere Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, T Bldg,Medisiinarinkatu 3, Tampere 33520, Finland
[4] Cent Finland Cent Hosp, Keskussairaalantie 19, Jyvaskyla 40620, Finland
关键词
Cryopreservation; Vitrification; Slow freezing; Frozen embryo transfer; CRITICAL-APPRAISAL; NEONATAL OUTCOMES; CHILDREN BORN; VITRIFICATION; CRYOPRESERVATION; FROZEN; BLASTOCYSTS; CYCLES; COHORT; TRANSFERS;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-015-0642-8
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose The aim of this study was to study the effect of the embryo freezing method on the birth weight of newborns from frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles, and the pregnancy results of cleavage stage embryos cryopreserved by slow freezing or vitrification. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study undertaken in a University Hospital IVF unit using concurrently both the slow-freezing and the vitrification techniques. All frozen-thawed and vitrified-warmed day 2 and day 3 embryo transfers during the time period from 1 April 2009 to 31 November 2013 were included in the study. Results There was no statistically significant weight difference between newborns from vitrified or slow-frozen embryos (3588 vs 3670 g). A higher post-thaw viability rate was achieved after cryopreservation by the vitrification technique compared to the slow-freezing protocol (83.4 vs 61.4 %). The miscarriage rate was lower in the vitrification group (15.7 vs 29.0 %). The live birth rates were similar (19.5 vs 19.1 %) in the slow-freezing and vitrification groups, respectively. Among vitrified embryos, 7.4 embryos needed to be thawed to produce one delivery; in the slow-freezing group, that number was 11.9. Conclusions The freezing method has no impact on the weight of the newborn. With lower post-thaw survival rates and higher miscarriage rates, the slow-freezing cryopreservation protocol is inferior to the vitrification technique.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 399
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Culturing cryopreserved cleavage stage embryos to blastocysts is a cost-effective method of utilizing frozen embryos.
    Feinman, M
    Boostanfar, R
    Potter, AL
    Khoury, C
    Behr, B
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 82 : S156 - S156
  • [22] Vitrification of cleavage stage embryos result in lower fetal birthweight than slow-freezing method: a large scale retrospective study in two centers
    Gu, F.
    Li, P.
    Guo, L.
    Xu, Y.
    Zhou, C.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 : 497 - 497
  • [23] SIMPLIFIED METHOD FOR FREEZING MOUSE EMBRYOS
    ZEILMAKER, GH
    VERHAMME, CMPM
    [J]. CRYOBIOLOGY, 1979, 16 (01) : 6 - 10
  • [24] Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number in Cleavage Stage Human Embryos-Impact on Infertility Outcome
    Podolak, Amira
    Liss, Joanna
    Kiewisz, Jolanta
    Pukszta, Sebastian
    Cybulska, Celina
    Rychlowski, Michal
    Lukaszuk, Aron
    Jakiel, Grzegorz
    Lukaszuk, Krzysztof
    [J]. CURRENT ISSUES IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2022, 44 (01) : 273 - 287
  • [25] THE IMPACT OF TWO DIFFERENT THAW PROTOCOLS ON OUTCOMES OF VITRIFIED CLEAVAGE-STAGE EMBRYOS TRANSFER
    Zhang, Xiao-jian
    Yang, Ye-Zhou
    Lv, Qun
    Wang, Yu
    Cao, Xue-hua
    Li, Xiao-jie
    Liao, Mei-xu
    Guo, Chun
    [J]. CRYOLETTERS, 2012, 33 (06) : 411 - 417
  • [26] Cleavage vs blastocyst stage embryos: how are they interrelating?
    Eran Zilberberg
    Robert Casper
    Jim Meriano
    Eran Barzilay
    Adva Aizer
    Michal Kirshenbaum
    Raoul Orvieto
    Jigal Haas
    [J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2021, 304 : 1083 - 1088
  • [27] The transcriptional profile of arrested cleavage stage human embryos
    Perez, M.
    Dominguez, F.
    Quinonero, A.
    Beltran, D.
    Arantza, D.
    Mercader, A.
    Martin, A.
    Pellicer, A.
    lo Santos, M. J. D.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 : 221 - 221
  • [28] Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage stage embryos
    Vanneste, E.
    Voet, T.
    Ampe, M.
    Konings, P.
    Melotte, C.
    Fryns, J.
    Verbeke, G.
    D'Hooghe, T.
    Moreau, Y.
    Vermeesch, J.
    [J]. CHROMOSOME RESEARCH, 2009, 17 : 202 - 202
  • [29] Morphological and cytogenetic assessment of cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos
    Fragouli, E.
    Alfarawati, S.
    Spath, K.
    Wells, D.
    [J]. MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2014, 20 (02) : 117 - 126
  • [30] Ultrastructure of cytoplasmic fragments in human cleavage stage embryos
    Halvaei, Iman
    Khalili, Mohammad Ali
    Esfandiari, Navid
    Safari, Somayyeh
    Talebi, Ali Reza
    Miglietta, Selenia
    Nottola, Stefania A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2016, 33 (12) : 1677 - 1684