Study on high -density planting of different dwarf inter rootstock combinations in apple

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Laiping [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Inst Pomol, Tai An 271000, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
apple; different dwarfing characteristics; planting density; tree growth status; orchard structure; leaves function; fruit quality; yield;
D O I
10.17660/ActaHortic.2019.1261.38
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
In order to determine suitable planting density for a wide -line close planting cultivation pattern of different dwarf inter-rootstock of apples, three different dwarf inter-rootstock combinations planted in 2010 have been chosen as experiment materials, namely, short-shoot cultivar and dwarfing rootstock `Tianhong 2'/ SH40/Malus robusta, strong dwarfing `Yanfu 3'/M9/M. robusta and weak dwarfing `Yanfu 3'/M26/M. robusta. From 2013-2015 (the fourth, fifth, and sixth year after planting), the influence of different planting densities (0.75, 1.0, 1.25 and 1.5x4.0 m) on tree growth, orchard structure, the function of leaves, yield, and quality was studied continuously, and the results were as follows. Planting density has no significant impact on tree height, trunk height, and trunk girth. The conjoining rate in plants with row spacing of 0.75 and 1.0 m is significantly higher than the other two treatments. Short shoot rate in the treatment of giving 0.75 and 1.0 m row spacing is significantly higher than the treatment of 1.5 m spacing in the rows, but the proportion of developing branches in plants with row spacing of 1.5 m is significantly higher than other treatments. Orchard coverage decreases with the increase in planting density for SH40 combination. Plants with row spacing of 0.75 and 1.0 m have a higher leaf net photosynthetic rate, and for M9 and M26 combinations, plants with row spacing of 1.0 and 1.25 m have the highest leaf net photosynthetic rate. As for yield, the highest is for the plants with a row spacing of 0.75 m, followed by the plants with a row spacing of 1.0 m, but yield per plant of plants with row spacing of 1.5 and 1.25 m is higher than that of 0.75 and 1.0 m in the sixth year. As for soluble solid contents (SSC), fruit shape index, and weight of single fruit, the highest in the SH40 combination are the plants with row spacing of 0.75 and 1.0 m, and the highest in M9 and M26 combinations are those with row spacing of 1.0 and 1.25 m. As for fruit hardness, plants with row spacing of 1.0 m (9.54 and 9.46 kg cm(-2)) are the hardest in SH40 and M26 combinations, and plants with row spacing of 1.0 and 1.25 m (9.52 and 9.32 kg cm(-2)) are the hardest in M9 combination. There is no significant difference in brightness, cleaning index, and colouring index for all treatments for the three combinations. It is comprehensively analysed that based on the studies on apple trees with dwarf inter -rootstock in the fourth to sixth year, the `Tianhong 2'/SH40/M. robusta combination is suitable for 0.75 or 1.0x4.0 m, while the 'Yanfu 3'/M9 and M26/M. robusta combinations are suitable for 1.0 or 1.25x4.0 m.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 272
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Tree Growth and Fruit-Bearing Depending on the Heading Height and the Rootstock in a High-Density Apple Orchard
    Domozetov, D.
    Borovinova, M.
    Taseva, V.
    Sredkov, I.
    Radomirska, I.
    Zdravkova, A.
    Ivanova, I.
    [J]. I BALKAN SYMPOSIUM ON FRUIT GROWING, 2009, 825 : 325 - 331
  • [32] Study on the growth and spatial distribution of the root system of different european pear cultivars on quince rootstock combinations
    Machado, Bruno Dalazen
    Magro, Maicon
    de Souza, Deivid Silva
    Rufato, Leo
    Kretzschmar, Aike Anneliese
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE FRUTICULTURA, 2018, 40 (02)
  • [33] Studies on high density planting and nutrient requirement of banana in different states of India
    Sanjit, Debnath
    Bauri, F. K.
    Swain, S.
    Patel, A. N.
    Patel, A. R.
    Shaikh, N. B.
    Bhalerao, V. P.
    Baruah, K.
    Manju, P. R.
    Suma, A.
    Menon, R.
    Gutam, S.
    Patil, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2021, 16 (02): : 152 - 163
  • [34] Effect of High Plant Density on Growth and Production Variables of European Pear Cultivars and Quince Rootstock Combinations in Southern Brazil
    Rufato, L.
    Machado, B. D.
    Kretzschmar, A. A.
    Bogo, A.
    Luz, A. R.
    Marcon Filho, J. L.
    [J]. X INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INTEGRATING CANOPY, ROOTSTOCK AND ENVIRONMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY IN ORCHARD SYSTEMS, 2014, 1058 : 71 - 76
  • [35] Citrus dwarfing viroid: effects on tree size and scion performance specific to Poncirus trifoliata rootstock for high-density planting
    Vidalakis, G.
    Pagliaccia, D.
    Bash, J. A.
    Afunian, M.
    Semancik, J. S.
    [J]. ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 2011, 158 (02) : 204 - 217
  • [36] Planting in the ‘inter-row’ to overcome replant disease in apple orchards: a study on the effectiveness of the practice based on microbial indicators
    Markus Kelderer
    Luisa M. Manici
    Francesco Caputo
    Martin Thalheimer
    [J]. Plant and Soil, 2012, 357 : 381 - 393
  • [37] Planting in the 'inter-row' to overcome replant disease in apple orchards: a study on the effectiveness of the practice based on microbial indicators
    Kelderer, Markus
    Manici, Luisa M.
    Caputo, Francesco
    Thalheimer, Martin
    [J]. PLANT AND SOIL, 2012, 357 (1-2) : 381 - 393
  • [38] Determination of benzyladenine content of in vitro propagated dwarf J-TE-F apple rootstock (Malus sp.) by high performance liquid chromatography
    Végvári, G
    Vitányi, G
    Mészáros, A
    Lelik, L
    [J]. GARTENBAUWISSENSCHAFT, 2000, 65 (06): : 241 - 244
  • [39] Performance of exotic apple varieties grafted on M9T337 clonal rootstock under high density plantation
    Mushtaq, Rafiya
    Pandit, Ashiq
    Raja, R. H. S.
    Mir, M. A.
    Sharma, M. K.
    Bhat, Rifat
    Baba, Jahangeer A.
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURE, 2019, 76 (03) : 530 - 534
  • [40] Comparison of Light Utilization Efficiency in terms of the Planting Distance, Orientation, and Tree Height for a High-Density Apple Orchard
    Kim, Chung-Sil
    Choi, Byeong-Ho
    Jung, Young-Ju
    Yoon, Tae-Myung
    [J]. HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 41 (03): : 260 - 270