Evaluation of the new TNM staging system proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer at a single institution

被引:54
|
作者
Kameyama, Kotaro [1 ]
Takahashi, Mamoru [1 ]
Ohata, Keiji [1 ]
Igai, Hitoshi [1 ]
Yamashina, Akihiko [1 ]
Matsuoka, Tomoaki [1 ]
Nakagawa, Tatsuo [2 ]
Okumura, Norihito [1 ]
机构
[1] Kurashiki Cent Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, Okayama 7108602, Japan
[2] Tenriyorozu Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, Nara, Japan
来源
关键词
FORTHCOMING 7TH EDITION; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; LIMITED RESECTION; MALIGNANT-TUMORS; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; PROJECT; CLASSIFICATION; REVISION; DESCRIPTORS; GROUPINGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.09.030
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The seventh TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours will be published in 2009. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer has proposed a revision of the current pathologic staging system. We illustrated the effects of this new system and pointed out potential problems using a retrospective study of surgical cases of non-small cell lung cancer at our institution. Methods: Subjects were 1532 patients for whom current pathologic staging was possible. These data were migrated into the new staging system. The numbers of patients at various stages determined by using the current and new staging systems were, respectively, as follows: IA (n = 700, n = 700), IB (n = 338, n = 249), IIA (n = 49, n = 164), IIB (n = 129, n = 116), IIIA (n = 204, n = 234), IIIB (n = 77, n = 17), and IV (n = 35, n = 52). Prognoses were compared by using the current and the new systems. Results: By using the new staging system, 5-year survivals by T classifications were as follows: T1a, 82.6%; T1b, 73.3%; T2a, 63.5%; T2b, 50.1%; T3, 40.6%; and T4, 34.6%. There were significant differences between the new T1a and T1b (P = .0026), T1b and T2a (P = .0027), and T2a and T2b (P = .0062) classifications. In the current system 5-year survivals based on pathologic stages were as follows: IA, 84.8%; IB, 72.9%; IIA, 53.8%; IIB, 53.7%; IIIA, 31.8%; IIIB, 34.0%; and IV, 27.1%. There were significant differences between stages IA and IB (P < .0001) and stages IIB and IIIA (P = .0006). In the new system these were as follows: IA, 84.8%; IB, 75.2%; IIA, 62.4%; IIB, 52.1%; IIIA, 32.4%; IIIB, 15.2%; and IV, 30.6%. There were significant differences between stages IA and IB (P = .0004), IB and IIA (P = .0195), IIA and IIB (P = .0257), IIB and IIIA (P = .0040), and IIIA and IIIB (P = .0399). Conclusion: Although the outcomes for stages IIIB and IV were reversed, the new pathologic staging system was considered valid based on our single-institution evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:1180 / 1184
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PITFALLS IN RADIOLOGIC EVALUATION OF TNM STAGING IN LUNG CANCER
    Ahn, Myeong Im
    Han, D. -H.
    Yoo, I. -R.
    Kang, J. H.
    Kim, Y. -K.
    Sung, S. -W.
    Park, Jae Kil
    Wang, Y. -P.
    Kim, Yeon-Sil
    Lee, Kyo Young
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 6 (06) : S1471 - S1471
  • [23] The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for the Revision of the Clinical and Pathologic Staging of Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer
    Nicholson, Andrew G.
    Chansky, Kari
    Crowley, John
    Beyruti, Ricardo
    Kubota, Kaoru
    Turrisi, Andrew
    Eberhardt, Wilfried E. E.
    van Meerbeeck, Jan
    Rami-Porta, Ramon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2016, 11 (03) : 300 - 311
  • [24] The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Project for Lung Cancer: Proposals for the Revision of the N Descriptors in the Forthcoming Ninth Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer
    Huang, James
    Osarogiagbon, Raymond U.
    Giroux, Dorothy J.
    Nishimura, Katherine K.
    Bille, Andrea
    Cardillo, Giuseppe
    Detterbeck, Frank
    Kernstine, Kemp
    Kim, Hong Kwan
    Lievens, Yolande
    Lim, Eric
    Marom, Edith
    Prosch, Helmut
    Putora, Paul Martin
    Rami-Porta, Ramon
    Rice, David
    Rocco, Gaetano
    Rusch, Valerie W.
    Opitz, Isabelle
    Vasquez, Francisco Suarez
    Van Schil, Paul
    Yang, Chi-Fu Jeffrey
    Asamura, Hisao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 19 (05) : 766 - 785
  • [25] Evaluation of the 7th edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer at a single institution
    Wang, Jia
    Wu, Nan
    Zheng, Qingfeng
    Feng, Yuan
    Yan, Shi
    Lv, Chao
    Li, Shaolei
    Wang, Yuzhao
    Yang, Yue
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 140 (07) : 1189 - 1195
  • [26] Evaluation of the 7th edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer at a single institution
    Jia Wang
    Nan Wu
    Qingfeng Zheng
    Yuan Feng
    Shi Yan
    Chao Lv
    Shaolei Li
    Yuzhao Wang
    Yue Yang
    [J]. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2014, 140 : 1189 - 1195
  • [27] Evaluation of the 8th Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer at a Single Institution
    Wang, J.
    Yang, Y.
    Nan, W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 13 (10) : S549 - S549
  • [28] THE NEW INTERNATIONAL STAGING SYSTEM FOR LUNG-CANCER
    MOUNTAIN, CF
    [J]. SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1987, 67 (05) : 925 - 935
  • [29] THE NEW INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM FOR STAGING LUNG-CANCER
    MOUNTAIN, CF
    [J]. SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1986, 79 (09) : 8 - 8
  • [30] The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Project: Methods and Guiding Principles for the Development of the Ninth Edition TNM Classification
    Detterbeck, Frank C.
    Nishimura, Katherine K.
    Cilento, Vanessa J.
    Giuliani, Meredith
    Marino, Mirella
    Osarogiagbon, Raymond U.
    Rami-Porta, Ramon
    Rusch, Valerie W.
    Asamura, Hisao
    Boards, Advisory
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 17 (06) : 806 - 815