Which Corporate Social Responsibility Performance Affects the Cost of Equity? Evidence from Korea

被引:22
|
作者
Ok, Youngkyung [1 ]
Kim, Jungmu [2 ]
机构
[1] DGB Res Inst, 111 Oksan Ro, Daegu 41593, South Korea
[2] Yeungnam Univ, Sch Business, 280 Daehak Ro, Gyongsan 38541, Gyeongbuk, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
cost of equity; CSR; ESG; sustainability; firm value; IMPLIED COST; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE; RETURN; GROWTH; RISK;
D O I
10.3390/su11102947
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study analyzes the effect of corporate social responsibility activities on the cost of equity in Korea. We find that firms with better corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance generally exhibit cheaper equity financing. Considering three dimensions of CSR separately, we find that a higher socially responsible management significantly reduces the cost of equity by 1.13%-1.37% per annum and Corporate governance activity also marginally affects the cost of equity, while environmental management has no impact. Our result is robust in controlling for systematic risk, size, leverage ratio, and the number of analysts. These results imply that enhancing socially responsible management and corporate governance can increase firm value in Korea, but environmental management is not relevant for firm values. Putting differently, investors tolerate a lower return from firms with more CSR activities, because they expect them to provide sustainable incomes. Future researches can extend our approach to examining the effect on the cost of debt and cost of capital.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Customer concentration and corporate social responsibility performance: Evidence from China
    Wen, Wen
    Ke, Yun
    Liu, Xuejiao
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2021, 46
  • [42] Financial performance and corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from Taiwan
    Lin, Lin
    Hung, Pi-Hsia
    Chou, De-Wai
    Lai, Christine W.
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2019, 24 (01) : 61 - 71
  • [43] Corporate social responsibility reporting and firm performance: evidence from China
    Cheng S.
    Lin K.Z.
    Wong W.
    [J]. Journal of Management & Governance, 2016, 20 (3) : 503 - 523
  • [44] Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Portfolio Performance: Evidence From Turkey
    Borak, Metin
    Dogukanli, Hatice
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [45] Corporate Social Responsibility as a Strategic Means to Attract Foreign Investment: Evidence from Korea
    Lee, Juil
    Kim, Sang-Joon
    Kwon, Insu
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (11)
  • [46] THE EFFECT OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND BOARD GENDER DIVERSITY ON BANKRUPTCY: EVIDENCE FROM KOREA
    Nam, Hyun-Jung
    An, Yohan
    [J]. ASIAN ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2021, 26 (02) : 53 - 74
  • [47] Organizational Slack, Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability, and Integrated Reporting: Evidence from Korea
    Kim, Su-In
    Shin, Hyejeong
    Shin, Heejeong
    Park, Sorah
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (16)
  • [48] Does corporate social responsibility impact equity risk? International evidence
    Monti, Alice
    Pattitoni, Pierpaolo
    Petracci, Barbara
    Randl, Otto
    [J]. REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING, 2022, 59 (03) : 825 - 855
  • [49] Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Performance, and Pay-Performance Sensitivity-Evidence from Shanghai Stock Exchange Social Responsibility Index
    Chang, Yuan
    Chen, Ting-Hsuan
    Shu, Min-Cheng
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2018, 54 (05) : 1183 - 1203
  • [50] Research on executive equity incentives and corporate innovation performance: the role of corporate social responsibility
    Yang, Ya-ru
    Han, Xiao-lin
    Wang, Xin
    Yu, Jing-yi
    [J]. CHINESE MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2023, 17 (05) : 1014 - 1030