The Adapted Firesetting Assessment Scale: reliability and validity

被引:0
|
作者
Collins, J. [1 ]
Langdon, P. E. [2 ,3 ]
Barnoux, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kent, Tizard Ctr, Canterbury CT2 7NZ, Kent, England
[2] Univ Warwick, Ctr Educ Dev Appraisal & Res CEDAR, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[3] Coventry & Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust, Coventry, W Midlands, England
关键词
AFAS; Arson; autism; developmental disabilities; firesetting; intellectual disabilities; INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; OFFENSE CHAIN; PEOPLE; GUIDELINE; ALPHA; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/jir.12950
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Background The Adapted Firesetting Assessment Scale was developed for use with adults with developmental disabilities targeting fire-related factors thought to be associated with deliberate firesetting behaviour (i.e. attitudes towards fire, fire interest, fire normalisation, identification with fire and fire safety awareness). However, the psychometric properties of the scale are yet to be evaluated. Method The reliability, validity, comprehensibility, relevance and comprehensiveness of the Adapted Firesetting Assessment Scale were evaluated. Fifty-nine adults with developmental disabilities, some of whom had a history of firesetting, completed the Adapted Firesetting Assessment Scale on two occasions. Feedback about the questionnaire was sought from both participants and professionals. Results The AFAS has acceptable internal consistency and excellent test-retest reliability. The attitudes towards fire, fire normalisation, poor fire safety subscales and total scores discriminated firesetters from non-firesetters. Content analysis of feedback indicated items of the AFAS were understood, relevant, accessible and comprehensible. Conclusion A larger study is needed to examine the factor structure of the AFAS.
引用
收藏
页码:642 / 654
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The development of the Adapted Firesetting Assessment Scale
    Collins, Josephine
    Barnoux, Magali
    Langdon, Peter E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2022, 35 (02) : 537 - 555
  • [2] Reliability and Validity of the Adapted Physical Education Assessment Scale (APEAS II)
    Barreira, Tiago V.
    White, Lindsey
    Norris, Michael L.
    [J]. RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2020, 91 : A26 - A26
  • [3] VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE CONSTIPATION ASSESSMENT SCALE
    MCMILLAN, SC
    WILLIAMS, FA
    [J]. CANCER NURSING, 1989, 12 (03) : 183 - 188
  • [4] VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE NEUROBEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT SCALE
    CHERNIK, DA
    TUCKER, M
    GIGLI, B
    YOO, K
    PAUL, K
    LAINE, H
    SIEGEL, JL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 12 (01) : 43 - 48
  • [5] Reliability and validity of the Relationship Assessment Scale
    Vaughn, MJ
    Baier, MEM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FAMILY THERAPY, 1999, 27 (02): : 137 - 147
  • [6] Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the ''adapted symptom distress scale''
    Tanghe, A
    Evers, G
    Paridaens
    Hermans, A
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 31A : 1426 - 1426
  • [7] Exploring the Reliability and Validity of the Adapted Arabic Sense of Coherence Scale
    Al-Yateem, Nabeel
    Alrimawi, Intima
    Fakhry, Randa
    AlShujairi, Arwa
    Rahman, Syed Azizur
    Al Marzouqi, Amina
    Rossiter, Rachel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING MEASUREMENT, 2021, 29 (02) : E110 - E125
  • [8] Testing the Validity and Reliability of the Adapted Health Communication Assessment Tool©
    Baird, Tamara
    Corey, Virginia Ruth
    Sissom, Jenna
    Weber, Jennifer
    Campbell, Suzanne Hetzel
    [J]. CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2021, 52 : 50 - 58
  • [9] Validity and reliability of an adapted social capital scale among Indian adults
    Kaur, Manmeet
    Chakrapani, Venkatesan
    Vijin, Pandora Purayil
    [J]. COGENT SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2019, 5 (01):
  • [10] An Adapted Chinese Version of Neck Pain and Disability Scale Validity and Reliability
    Chen, Ziqiang
    Zhao, Yingchuan
    Wang, ChuanFeng
    Li, Ming
    Zhu, Xiaodong
    [J]. SPINE, 2011, 36 (20) : E1322 - E1327