Gender Differences in the Difficulty in Disengaging from Threat among Children and Adolescents With Social Anxiety

被引:8
|
作者
Zhang, Peng [1 ]
Ni, Wenjin [2 ]
Xie, Ruibo [1 ]
Xu, Jiahua [3 ]
Liu, Xiangping [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Educ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Brain & Cognit Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2017年 / 8卷
关键词
gender differences; attentional bias; difficulty disengagement; social anxiety; adolescents; ATTENTION BIAS MODIFICATION; DOT-PROBE TASK; PEDIATRIC ANXIETY; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; MEDIATING ROLE; ANXIOUS YOUTH; EYE-TRACKING; DISORDERS; FACES; EMOTION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00419
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
There is some research showing that social anxiety is related with attentional bias to threat. However, others fail to find this relationship and propose that gender differences may play a role. The aim of this study was to investigate the gender differences in the subcomponents of attentional bias to threat (hypervigilance and difficulty in disengaging) among children and adolescents with social anxiety. Overall, 181 youngsters aged between 10 and 14 participated in the current study. Images of disgusted faces were used as threat stimuli in an Exogenous Cueing Task was used to measure the subcomponents of attentional bias. Additionally, the Social Anxiety Scale for Children was used to measure social anxiety. The repeated measures ANOVA showed that male participants with high social anxiety showed difficulty in disengaging from threat, but this was not the case for female participants. Our results indicated that social anxiety is more related with attentional bias to threat among male children and adolescents than females. These findings suggested that developing gender-specific treatments for social anxiety may improve treatment effects.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Gender differences in problematic social media use among adolescents
    Koronczai, Beatrix
    Kokonyei, Gyongyi
    Demetrovics, Zsolt
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL ADDICTIONS, 2019, 8 : 136 - 136
  • [12] Gender differences in anxiety disorders and anxiety symptoms in adolescents
    Lewinsohn, PM
    Gotlib, IH
    Lewinsohn, M
    Seeley, JR
    Allen, NB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 107 (01) : 109 - 117
  • [13] Gender differences in memory test performance among children and adolescents
    Lowe, PA
    Mayfield, JW
    Reynolds, CR
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 18 (08) : 865 - 878
  • [14] SEX, ETHNIC, AND SOCIAL DIFFERENCES IN TEST ANXIETY AMONG ISRAELI ADOLESCENTS
    ZEIDNER, M
    SAFIR, MP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENETIC PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 150 (02): : 175 - 185
  • [15] Anxiety disorder symptoms in children and adolescents: Differences by age and gender in a community sample
    Orgiles, Mireia
    Mendez, Xavier
    Pedro Espada, Jose
    Luis Carballo, Jose
    Antonio Piqueras, Jose
    [J]. REVISTA DE PSIQUIATRIA Y SALUD MENTAL, 2012, 5 (02): : 115 - 120
  • [16] GENDER DIFFERENCES IN SOCIAL AND TEST ANXIETY
    DIMARIA, F
    DINUOVO, S
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1990, 11 (05) : 525 - 530
  • [17] Gender differences in social anxiety disorder
    Asher, Maya
    Aderka, Idan M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 74 (10) : 1730 - 1741
  • [18] Gender differences in cigarette smoking, social correlates and cessation among adolescents
    Branstetter, Steven A.
    Blosnich, John
    Dino, Geri
    Nolan, Jill
    Horn, Kimberly
    [J]. ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2012, 37 (06) : 739 - 742
  • [19] Ethnic and Gender Differences in Family Social Support among Black Adolescents
    Cross, Christina J.
    Taylor, Robert Joseph
    Chatters, Linda M.
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2018, 6 (01)
  • [20] Age and gender differences in use and consumption of social media among adolescents
    Garcia-Jimenez, Antonio
    Catalina-Garcia, Beatriz
    Tur-Vines, Victoria
    [J]. ADCOMUNICA-REVISTA CIENTIFICA DE ESTRATEGIAS TENDENCIAS E INNOVACION EN COMMUNICACION, 2021, (22): : 211 - 234