Beam-specific planning target volumes incorporating 4D CT for pencil beam scanning proton therapy of thoracic tumors

被引:60
|
作者
Lin, Liyong [1 ]
Kang, Minglei [1 ]
Huang, Sheng [1 ]
Mayer, Rulon [2 ]
Thomas, Andrew [3 ]
Solberg, Timothy D. [1 ]
McDonough, Jame E. [1 ]
Simone, Charles B., II [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Henry Jackson Fdn, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] ATC Healthcare, Washington, DC USA
来源
关键词
4D CT; beam-specific PTV; treatment planning; proton therapy; pencil beam scanning; interplay; RESPIRATORY MOTION; TREATMENT UNCERTAINTIES; PARTICLE THERAPY; SPOT SIZE; LUNG; CANCER; DELIVERY; RADIOTHERAPY; SENSITIVITY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v16i6.5678
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to determine whether organ sparing and target coverage can be simultaneously maintained for pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy treatment of thoracic tumors in the presence of motion, stopping power uncertainties, and patient setup variations. Ten consecutive patients that were previously treated with proton therapy to 66.6/1.8 Gy (RBE) using double scattering (DS) were replanned with PBS. Minimum and maximum intensity images from 4D CT were used to introduce flexible smearing in the determination of the beam specific PTV (BSPTV). Datasets from eight 4D CT phases, using +/- 3% uncertainty in stopping power and +/- 3 mm uncertainty in patient setup in each direction, were used to create 8 x 12 x 10 = 960 PBS plans for the evaluation of 10 patients. Plans were normalized to provide identical coverage between DS and PBS. The average lung V20, V5, and mean doses were reduced from 29.0%, 35.0%, and 16.4 Gy with DS to 24.6%, 30.6%, and 14.1 Gy with PBS, respectively. The average heart V30 and V45 were reduced from 10.4% and 7.5% in DS to 8.1% and 5.4% for PBS, respectively. Furthermore, the maximum spinal cord, esophagus, and heart doses were decreased from 37.1 Gy, 71.7 Gy, and 69.2 Gy with DS to 31.3 Gy, 67.9 Gy, and 64.6 Gy with PBS. The conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and global maximal dose were improved from 3.2, 0.08, 77.4 Gy with DS to 2.8, 0.04, and 72.1 Gy with PBS. All differences are statistically significant, with p-values < 0.05, with the exception of the heart V45 (p = 0.146). PBS with BSPTV achieves better organ sparing and improves target coverage using a repainting method for the treatment of thoracic tumors. Incorporating motion-related uncertainties is essential.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 292
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Proton pencil beam scanning in pediatric posterior fossa tumors: a European treatment planning study
    Toussaint, L.
    Muren, L.
    Cerron Campoo, F.
    Charlwood, F.
    Fager, M.
    Goedgebeur, A.
    Goudjil, F.
    Kristensen, I.
    Laegdsmand, P.
    Mirandola, A.
    Moignier, C.
    Petterson, E.
    Plaude, S.
    Righetto, R.
    Vestergaard, A.
    Matysiak, W.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S280 - S282
  • [32] Predictive Models for Cone Beam CT-Based Online Verification of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    Yin, L.
    Janssens, G.
    Lin, A.
    Ahn, P.
    Solberg, T.
    McDonough, J.
    Teo, B.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3454 - 3454
  • [33] A motion model-guided 4D dose reconstruction for pencil beam scanned proton therapy
    Duetschler, A.
    Huang, L.
    Fattori, G.
    Meier, G.
    Bula, C.
    Hrbacek, J.
    Safai, S.
    Weber, D. C.
    Lomax, A. J.
    Zhang, Ye
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (11):
  • [34] Timing Features of 4D Detector and Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy Can Improve WET Map Accuracy with Deep CNN
    Chang, C.
    Zhou, S.
    Zhou, J.
    Yang, X.
    Zhang, T.
    Lin, L.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E866 - E866
  • [35] Exploring the Capability of 4D Optimization for Moving Tumour Treatments Using Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) Proton Therapy: A Benchmarking Study
    Zhang, Ye
    Tiberio, P.
    Huth, I.
    Weber, D.
    Lomax, A.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E432 - E432
  • [36] Limitations of, and alternatives to, patient specific verification measurements for pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Matter, Michael
    Nenoff, Lena
    Meier, Gabriel
    Weber, Damien Charles
    Lomax, Tony
    Albertini, Francesca
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2019, 195 (06) : 601 - 601
  • [37] Thoracic 4D Cone-Beam CT Registration Incorporating a Fan-Beam CT-Derived Feasible Motion Descriptor
    Sang, Y.
    Ruan, D.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [38] 4D Dose Reconstruction and Evaluation for Gated Scanning Particle Beam Therapy of Thoracic Patients
    Sheng, Y.
    Graeff, C.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S1741 - S1743
  • [39] Clinical implementations of 4D pencil beam scanned particle therapy: Report on the 4D treatment planning workshop 2016 and 2017
    Trnkova, Petra
    Knaeusl, Barbara
    Actis, Oxana
    Bert, Christoph
    Biegun, Aleksandra K.
    Boehlen, Till T.
    Furtado, Hugo
    McClelland, Jamie
    Mori, Shinichiro
    Rinaldi, Ilaria
    Rucinski, Antoni
    Knopf, Antje C.
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 54 : 121 - 130
  • [40] Comparison of proton therapy treatment planning for head tumors with a pencil beam algorithm on dual and single energy CT images
    Hudobivnik, Nace
    Schwarz, Florian
    Johnson, Thorsten
    Agolli, Linda
    Dedes, George
    Tessonnier, Thomas
    Verhaegen, Frank
    Thieke, Christian
    Belka, Claus
    Sommer, Wieland H.
    Parodi, Katia
    Landry, Guillaume
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (01) : 495 - 504