This study examines the small-sample properties of some commonly used tests of equal forecast accuracy. The paper considers the size and power of different tests and the performance of different heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation-consistent (HAC) variance estimators. Monte Carlo experiments show that the tests all suffer some size distortions in small samples, with the distortions varying across tests. The experiments also show that, adjusted for size distortions, the tests have broadly similar power, although some small differences exist. Finally, the experiments indicate that the size and power performances of HAC estimators vary with the features of the data. Copyright (C) 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机构:
Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Stat, Beijing, Peoples R ChinaBeijing Normal Univ, Sch Stat, Beijing, Peoples R China
Jiang, Qing
Huskova, Marie
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Charles Univ Prague, Dept Stat, Prague, Czech RepublicBeijing Normal Univ, Sch Stat, Beijing, Peoples R China
Huskova, Marie
Meintanis, Simos G.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Dept Econ, Athens, Greece
North West Univ, Unit Business Math & Informat, Potchefstroom, South AfricaBeijing Normal Univ, Sch Stat, Beijing, Peoples R China
Meintanis, Simos G.
Zhu, Lixing
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Stat, Beijing, Peoples R China
Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Math, Hong Kong, Peoples R ChinaBeijing Normal Univ, Sch Stat, Beijing, Peoples R China