Anlotinib, Vincristine, and Irinotecan for Advanced Ewing Sarcoma After Failure of Standard Multimodal Therapy: A Two-Cohort, Phase Ib/II Trial

被引:18
|
作者
Xu, Jie [1 ]
Xie, Lu [1 ]
Sun, Xin [1 ]
Liu, Kuisheng [1 ]
Tang, Xiaodong [1 ]
Yan, Taiqiang [1 ]
Yang, Rongli [1 ]
Guo, Wei [1 ]
Gu, Jin [2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Musculoskeletal Tumor Ctr, Peoples Hosp, 11 Xizhimen South St, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Shougang Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
ONCOLOGIST | 2021年 / 26卷 / 07期
关键词
Anlotinib; Irinotecan; Ewing sarcoma;
D O I
10.1002/onco.13726
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Both protracted irinotecan and antiangiogenesis therapy have shown promising efficacy against Ewing sarcoma (EWS). Methods Patients diagnosed with recurrent or refractory EWS were enrolled and further categorized into cohort A (>= 16 years) or cohort B (<16 years). In the dose-defining phase Ib portion, anlotinib was given daily at a fixed dose, while a 3+3 design with dose de-escalation was used to determine the dose of irinotecan. The next dose-expanding phase II portion employed a conventional two-stage study design model. The primary endpoint was objective response rate at 12 weeks (ORR12w). Results A total of 41 patients finally received the treatment regimen, including 29 in cohort A and 12 in cohort B. For cohort A, the first five patients were treated at the initial level of 20 mg/m(2)/d d x 5 x 2, and two of them subsequently a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). An additional six patients were then treated at 15 mg/m(2) without any DLT, and the RP2D was determined. Notably, 23 out of 24 patients in cohort A were available for response evaluation at 12 weeks. ORR12w was determined to be 62.5%. For cohort B, no DLT was observed in the first six patients at the initial dose level. At last, 12 patients were included in cohort B. The ORR12w was 83.3%. The most frequently observed grade 3/4 adverse events were leukopenia (28.5%), neutropenia (24.4%), anemia (8.7%), and diarrhea (3.7%). Conclusion The combination of vincristine, irinotecan, and anlotinib demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile and promising clinical efficacy in patients with advanced EWS. Implications for Practice This is the first trial to evaluate an irinotecan-based regimen in combination with antiangiogenesis tyrosine kinase inhibitors in Ewing sarcoma (EWS). A 3+3 design with dose de-escalation was used to determine the most appropriate dose of irinotecan in each cohort. The next dose-expanding phase II portion employed a conventional two-stage study design model. The objective response rate was 62.5% for adults and 83.3% for children. Median overall survival was not matured. This study shows that the combination of vincristine, irinotecan, and anlotinib demonstrates an acceptable toxicity profile and promising clinical efficacy in patients with advanced EWS.
引用
收藏
页码:E1256 / E1262
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [21] Phase I/II trial of capecitabine and gefitinib in patients with advanced colorectal cancer after failure of first-line therapy
    Gravalos, C.
    Escudero, P.
    Jimeno, A.
    Sevilla, I.
    Vega-Villegas, M. E.
    Alonso, V.
    Juez, I.
    Garcia-Carbonero, R.
    Bovio, H.
    Cortes-Funes, H.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2005, 3 (02): : 198 - 199
  • [23] RMC-4630 and sotorasib for advanced KRASG12C NSCLC after failure of prior standard therapies: A phase II trial
    Johnson, M. L.
    Langdon, R.
    Ellison, D.
    Spira, A.
    Amin, H.
    Castine, M.
    Daniel, D. B.
    Sohoni, S.
    Chen, Y-C.
    Hayes, J.
    Mu, Y.
    Masciari, S.
    Wang, X.
    Toya, S.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 : S66 - S67
  • [24] Phase II trial of preoperative cisplatin-irinotecan followed by concurrent cisplatin-irinotecan and radiotherapy: PET scan after induction therapy may identify early treatment failure.
    Ilson, D. H.
    Bains, M.
    Rizk, N.
    Shah, M.
    Rusch, V.
    Capanu, M.
    Flores, R.
    Kelsen, D.
    Park, B.
    Kepler, S.
    Minsky, B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (18) : 184S - 184S
  • [25] A Single-Arm Phase II Trial of Weekly Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel Monotherapy After Standard Therapy for Advanced NSCLC
    Kato, Y.
    Okuma, Y.
    Hosomi, Y.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (10) : S919 - S920
  • [26] Phase II trial of bexarotene capsules in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer after failure of two or more previous therapies
    Govindan, Ramaswamy
    Crowley, John
    Schwartzberg, Lee
    Kennedy, Peter
    Williams, Charles
    Ekstrand, Bradley
    Sandler, Alan
    Jaunakais, Dinah
    Bolejack, Vanessa
    Ghalie, Richard
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (30) : 4848 - 4854
  • [27] Phase II trial of irinotecan (CPT-11) administred every two weeks (q2wks) to patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) after failure to one previous fluoropirimidine based schedule.
    García-Girón, C
    Méndez, M
    García-Palomo, A
    Encarna, A
    León, A
    Alvarez, J
    Alonso, C
    Barceló, R
    Arroyo, M
    Farrés, J
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2000, 11 : 55 - 56
  • [28] A randomized phase II trial of irinotecan in combination with infusional or two different bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid regimens as flrst-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer
    Bouzid, K
    Khalfallah, S
    Tujakowski, J
    Piko, B
    Purkalne, G
    Plate, S
    Padrik, P
    Serafy, M
    Pshevloutsky, EM
    Boussard, B
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2003, 14 (07) : 1106 - 1114
  • [29] Phase II Trial of the C-Met Inhibitor Tepotinib in Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma with MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutations after Failure of Prior Therapy
    Paik, Paul
    Stammberger, Uz
    Bruns, Rolf
    Overton, Lindsay
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 12 (01) : S1230 - S1230
  • [30] Second-line therapy with pemetrexed after gemcitabine failure in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer:: A multicenter phase II trial.
    Boeck, S.
    Weigang-Koehler, K.
    Fuchs, M.
    Kettner, E.
    Quietzsch, D.
    Trojan, J.
    Stötzer, O.
    Mueller, E.
    Depenbrock, H.
    Heinemann, V.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (18) : 208S - 208S