共 46 条
5-Amino salicylic acid absorption and metabolism in ulcerative colitis patients receiving maintenance sulphasalazine, olsalazine or mesalazine
被引:37
|作者:
Stretch, GL
Campbell, BJ
Dwarakanath, AD
Yaqoob, M
Stevenson, A
Morris, AI
Rhodes, JM
机构:
[1] UNIV LIVERPOOL,DEPT MED,LIVERPOOL L69 3BX,MERSEYSIDE,ENGLAND
[2] LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIV,SCH PHARM,LIVERPOOL L3 5UX,MERSEYSIDE,ENGLAND
[3] ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIV HOSP,DEPT RENAL MED,LIVERPOOL,MERSEYSIDE,ENGLAND
[4] ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIV HOSP,DEPT GASTROENTEROL,LIVERPOOL,MERSEYSIDE,ENGLAND
[5] HLTH & SAFETY LAB,SHEFFIELD,S YORKSHIRE,ENGLAND
关键词:
D O I:
10.1046/j.1365-2036.1996.85257000.x
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: All 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) preparations are potentially nephrotoxic, but there has been concern that newer delivery systems may increase this risk, either because of altered absorption or altered metabolism. Previous studies of 5-ASA absorption and excretion have usually either been performed in healthy controls or have only examined short-term therapy, 5-ASA and N-acetyl-5-ASA have therefore been measured in blood samples, and N-acetyl-5-ASA in urine samples, from patients with ulcerative colitis on long-term maintenance with different 5-ASA preparations and compared with sensitive markers of renal damage. Methods: Patients receiving mesalazine (Asacol) (n = 13), sulphasalazine (n = 12) or olsalazine (Dipentum) (n = 8), all at doses within the recommended range were studied, Six-hour and trough serum concentrations of 5-ASA and N-acetyl-5-ASA and 24-h urinary excretion of N-acetyl-5-ASA were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, Results: Absorption of 5-ASA, assessed as 24-h excretion of N-acetyl-5-ASA expressed as molar % of ingested dose, was greater in patients receiving mesalazine, 23.25 +/- 10.65% (mean +/- s.d.; n = 13), than those receiving sulphasalazine (11.16 +/- 0.52%, n = 12; P = 0.003) or olsalazine (9.70 +/- 3.89%, n = 8; P < 0.002), The ratio of 5-ASA:N-acetyl-5-ASA in the serum 6 h after dose was also greater with mesalazine (1.02 +/- 0.44, mean +/- s.d.) than sulphasalazine (0.54 +/- 0.44, P < 0.02) or olsalazine (0.38 +/- 0.44, P < 0.005). Urinary markers of tubular damage were increased in four of 33 patients, but showed no correlation with concentration of 5-ASA or N-acetyl-5-ASA in serum and N-acetyl-5-ASA in urine, nor with lifetime dose or average daily dose of 5-ASA, Conclusions: In patients with ulcerative colitis receiving maintenance 5-ASA therapy there was greater absorption and less acetylation of 5-ASA from mesalazine (Asacol) compared with sulphasalazine or olsalazine, but no evidence from this study that this resulted in increased nephrotoxicity.
引用
收藏
页码:941 / 947
页数:7
相关论文