Incorporating insurance value into ecosystem services assessments: Mitigation of ecosystem users' welfare uncertainty through biological control

被引:9
|
作者
Peled, Yoav [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zemah-Shamir, Shiri [5 ]
Israel, Alvaro [2 ]
Shechter, Mordechai [3 ,4 ]
Ofir, Eyal [6 ]
Gal, Gideon [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Haifa, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Management, IL-31905 Haifa, Israel
[2] Natl Inst Oceanog, Israel Oceanog & Limnol Res, POB 8030, IL-31080 Haifa, Israel
[3] Univ Haifa, Nat Resources & Environm Res Ctr, IL-31905 Haifa, Israel
[4] Univ Haifa, Dept Econ, IL-3498838 Haifa, Israel
[5] Interdisciplinary Ctr Herzliya, Sch Sustainabil, POB 167, IL-4610101 Herzliyya, Israel
[6] Israel Oceanog & Limnol Res, Kinneret Limnol Lab, POB 447, Migdal, Israel
关键词
Biological control; Insurance value; Economic valuation; Contingent valuation method; Ecosystem services; PEST-CONTROL; ECONOMIC VALUE; MEDITERRANEAN SEA; RISK-AVERSION; PUBLIC-GOODS; BIODIVERSITY; MANAGEMENT; VALUATION; ECOLOGY; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101192
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecosystems and underlying biodiversity frequently ensure sustained welfare by reducing the risk associated with detrimental biological agents. This attribute is commonly termed biological control, but its valuation is usually underrepresented in the ecosystem services literature. In our study, a unique valuation method is applied, based on the natural insurance value of biological control and its contribution to expected welfare, evaluating its importance in mitigating ecosystem users' welfare loss under uncertain conditions. The study tests the feasibility of a conceptual valuation model using the Mediterranean Sea as a case study by assessing the properties of indigenous species to mitigate the impact of invasive species. The results show that varying the levels of indigenous ecosystem components governs the probability of potential welfare loss and its associated value to ecosystem users. While an increase in indigenous biomass levels results in an increase in the total value of biological control, positive values of insurance are achieved only at a certain biomass level, from which the welfare uncertainty of ecosystem users is gradually reduced. Below such levels, the ecosystem component responsible for mitigating risk does not supply any insurance values, as it increases the certainty of low welfare for ecosystem users.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [21] Local management and landscape drivers of pollination and biological control services in a Kenyan agro-ecosystem
    Otieno, Mark
    Woodcock, Ben A.
    Wilby, Andrew
    Vogiatzakis, Ioannis N.
    Mauchline, Alice L.
    Gikungu, Mary W.
    Potts, Simon G.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2011, 144 (10) : 2424 - 2431
  • [22] A novel uncertainty assessment protocol for integrated ecosystem services-life cycle assessments: A comparative case of nature-based solutions
    Alshehri, Khaled
    Chen, I-Chun
    Rugani, Benedetto
    Sapsford, Devin
    Harbottle, Michael
    Cleall, Peter
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2024, 47 : 499 - 515
  • [23] Agri-environment scheme enhancing ecosystem services: A demonstration of improved biological control in cereal crops
    Holland, J. M.
    Oaten, H.
    Moreby, S.
    Birkett, T.
    Simper, J.
    Southway, S.
    Smith, B. M.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 155 : 147 - 152
  • [24] Integrating ecosystem services value and uncertainty into regional ecological risk assessment: A case study of Hubei Province, Central China
    Xing, Lu
    Hu, Mingsheng
    Wang, Yi
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 740
  • [25] Indirect effects of genetically modified herbicide tolerant crops on biodiversity and ecosystem services: the biological control example
    Franz Bigler
    Ramon Albajes
    Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit, 2011, 6 : 79 - 84
  • [26] Transparent and feasible uncertainty assessment adds value to applied ecosystem services modeling (vol 33, pg 103, 2018)
    Bryant, Benjamin P.
    Borsuk, Mark E.
    Hamel, Perrine
    Oleson, Kirsten L. L.
    Schulp, C. J. E.
    Willcock, Simon
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 38
  • [27] Indirect effects of genetically modified herbicide tolerant crops on biodiversity and ecosystem services: the biological control example
    Bigler, Franz
    Albajes, Ramon
    JOURNAL FUR VERBRAUCHERSCHUTZ UND LEBENSMITTELSICHERHEIT-JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PROTECTION AND FOOD SAFETY, 2011, 6 : 79 - 84
  • [28] Realizing the value of grassland ecosystem services: global practice and its inspiration for the karst desertification control area
    Li, Yongyao
    Xiong, Kangning
    Song, Shuzhen
    Zhang, Wenfang
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2024, 7
  • [29] PROSPECTS IN SUSTAINABLE CONTROL OF OIL PALM PESTS AND DISEASES THROUGH THE ENHANCEMENT OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES - THE WAY FORWARD
    Kamarudin, Norman
    Abu Seman, Idris
    Masri, Mohd Mazmira Mohd
    JOURNAL OF OIL PALM RESEARCH, 2019, 31 (03): : 381 - 393
  • [30] Conservation biological control using Australian native plants in a brassica crop system: seeking complementary ecosystem services
    Pandey, Sunita
    Gurr, Geoff M.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 280 : 77 - 84