A randomized controlled trial testing a decision support intervention for older patients with advanced kidney disease

被引:28
|
作者
Brown, Leanne [1 ,2 ]
Gardner, Glenn [1 ,2 ]
Bonner, Ann [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Nursing, Victoria Pk Rd, Brisbane, Qld 4059, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Inst Hlth & Biomed Innovat, Victoria Pk Rd, Brisbane, Qld 4059, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Chron Kidney Dis Ctr Res Excellence, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Metro North Hosp & Hlth Serv, Kidney Hlth Serv, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
chronic kidney disease; decision support intervention; dialysis; nursing; ottawa decision support framework; shared decision-making; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; STAGE RENAL-DISEASE; CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL OUTCOMES; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; SYMPTOM BURDEN; DIALYSIS; CARE; AID; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1111/jan.14112
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim To evaluate the effectiveness of a decision support intervention (OPTIONS) in facilitating the older person with advanced kidney disease to make a treatment choice. Design Pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Methods People aged >= 70 years with advanced kidney disease (eGFR <= 20 ml/min/1.73m(2)) who had not made a decision about treatment options and who were not eligible for a kidney transplant were recruited between March 2015 and March 2016. Participants were randomly allocated to receive the OPTIONS (N = 16) or standard care (N = 21). OPTIONS is a 4-week nurse-delivered intervention. Primary outcomes were decision conflict and decision regret, the secondary outcomes were knowledge of risk and benefits of dialysis and health-related quality of life. The usefulness of OPTIONS was also evaluated. Results There were no differences between the intervention and standard care groups at baseline. At T1, there were no significant differences in decision conflict and decision regret although the intervention group had lower decisional conflict at T2. The decision support intervention was able to significantly improve the participants' knowledge score in the intervention group. There were no observable differences between groups for health-related quality of life physical and mental health component summary scores. OPTIONS was helpful in preparing participants in making a treatment decision. Conclusion OPTIONS, a decision support intervention, increased a person's knowledge of the benefits and risks of dialysis and can be used to facilitate shared decision-making with older adults with advanced stages of kidney disease. Impact Strategies to improve shared decision-making between older people with advanced stages of kidney disease and their clinicians are crucial for patient autonomy in a population where this may not be common practice. The decision support intervention- OPTIONS demonstrated significant improvement in patient knowledge about different treatment pathways. OPTIONS provides a structured and evidence-based approach to support shared decision-making for this population. Trial Registration ACTRN 12614001090606 Registered 14/10/2014.
引用
收藏
页码:3032 / 3044
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Individualized intervention for frail non-dialysis elderly patients with chronic kidney disease: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Chang, Jing
    Gao, Yun
    Fang, Xiang-Yang
    Zhao, Su-Mei
    Hou, Yuan-Ping
    Sun, Qian-Mei
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [42] A Mobile Intervention to Support Self-Care of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Preliminary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Li, Polly Wai Chi
    Yu, Doris S.
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [43] Pediatricians' decision making: A randomized controlled trial of decision support with sensitivity and specificity
    Sox, CM
    Koepsell, TD
    Doctor, JN
    Christakis, DA
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2004, 55 (04) : 194A - 194A
  • [44] Synbiotic Supplementations for Azotemia in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Dehghani, Hamideh
    Heidari, Fatemeh
    Mozaffari-Khosravi, Hassan
    Nouri-Majelan, Nader
    Dehghani, Ali
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2016, 10 (06) : 351 - 357
  • [45] Design and analysis of a randomized controlled trial testing the effects of clinical decision support on the management of rheumatoid arthritis
    Fransen, J
    Twisk, JWR
    Creemers, MCW
    Van Riel, PLCM
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2004, 51 (01): : 124 - 127
  • [46] Efficacy of a comprehensive geriatric intervention in older patients hospitalized for hip fracture:: A randomized, controlled trial
    Vidán, M
    Serra, JA
    Moreno, C
    Riquelme, G
    Ortiz, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2005, 53 (09) : 1476 - 1482
  • [47] A Comprehensive Pharmacist Intervention to Reduce Morbidity in Patients 80 Years or Older A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Gillespie, Ulrika
    Alassaad, Anna
    Henrohn, Dan
    Garmo, Hans
    Hammarlund-Udenaes, Margareta
    Toss, Henrik
    Kettis-Lindblad, Asa
    Melhus, Hakan
    Morlin, Claes
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 169 (09) : 894 - 900
  • [48] Economic evaluation of an extended nutritional intervention in older Australian hospitalized patients: a randomized controlled trial
    Sharma, Yogesh
    Thompson, Campbell
    Miller, Michelle
    Shahi, Rashmi
    Hakendorf, Paul
    Horwood, Chris
    Kaambwa, Billingsley
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2018, 18
  • [49] Economic evaluation of an extended nutritional intervention in older Australian hospitalized patients: a randomized controlled trial
    Yogesh Sharma
    Campbell Thompson
    Michelle Miller
    Rashmi Shahi
    Paul Hakendorf
    Chris Horwood
    Billingsley Kaambwa
    BMC Geriatrics, 18
  • [50] Study of pharmacist intervention in polypharmacy among older patients: Non-randomized, controlled trial
    Hashimoto, Ryota
    Fujii, Keiko
    Shimoji, Shizuka
    Utsumi, Atsuyuki
    Hosokawa, Kazutaka
    Tochino, Hiroki
    Sanehisa, Shigeki
    Akishita, Masahiro
    Onda, Mitsuko
    GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 20 (03) : 229 - 237