Postpartum Contraception Use by Urban/Rural Status: An Analysis of the Michigan Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System Data

被引:12
|
作者
Starr, Katherine A. [1 ]
Martins, Summer L. [1 ]
Watson, Sydeaka [2 ]
Gilliam, Melissa L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sect Family Planning & Contracept Res, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Hlth Studies, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
DELIVERY; OUTCOMES; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.whi.2015.06.014
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: We sought to examine rural/urban differences in postpartum contraceptive use, which are underexplored in the literature. Methods: We analyzed phase 5 (2004-2008) of the Michigan Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) survey. Using Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes and weighted multinomial logistic regression, we examined the association between self-reported postpartum contraceptive method and rural/urban residence among postpartum women not desiring pregnancy (n = 6,468). Results: Postpartum (mean, 16.5 weeks after delivery), 14.4% of respondents were using sterilization, 6.7% long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), 37.3% moderately effective hormonal methods, 38.4% less effective methods or no method, and 3.2% abstinence. Multivariable analysis yielded sporadic geographic patterns. Odds of method use varied significantly by age, parity, body mass index, and breastfeeding status. Not discussing contraception with a prenatal healthcare provider decreased odds of postpartum LARC use (odds ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.36-0.75). Number of prenatal visits and weeks since delivery were not associated with postpartum contraception method. Conclusions: We did not observe strong variation in postpartum contraceptive use based on geography. Low uptake of highly effective contraception across rural and urban areas suggests a need for education and outreach regarding these methods. Copyright (C) 2015 by the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:622 / 627
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] High-Risk Pregnancy in North Carolina: Predictors of High Efficacy Postpartum Contraception Use
    Cox-Terry, Maya
    Edwards, James
    Dogbey, Godwin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 230 (01) : S436 - S436
  • [32] Association of prenatal substance use with prenatal and postpartum care: Evidence from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 2016-2019
    Simmons, Elizabeth
    Austin, Anna E.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 159
  • [33] Hormonal contraception use and pregnancy in adolescents with sickle cell disease: analysis of Michigan Medicaid claims
    O'Brien, Sarah H.
    Klima, Jennifer
    Reed, Suzanne
    Chisolm, Deena
    Schwarz, Eleanor B.
    Kelleher, Kelly J.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2011, 83 (02) : 134 - 137
  • [34] ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT WOMEN'S REASONS FOR NOT USING CONTRACEPTION BEFORE AN UNPLANNED PREGNANCY, PREGNANCY RISK ASSESSMENT MONITORING SYSTEM, 2020
    Steiner, Riley J.
    Hurst, Stacey
    Kortsmit, Katherine K.
    Axelson, Sarah
    Brittain, Anna W.
    Sealy, Gillian
    Warner, Lee
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2023, 72 (03) : S106 - S106
  • [35] Characteristics of Marijuana Use During Pregnancy - Eight States, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 2017
    Ko, Jean Y.
    Coy, Kelsey C.
    Haight, Sarah C.
    Haegerich, Tamara M.
    Williams, Letitia
    Cox, Shanna
    Njai, Rashid
    Grant, Althea M.
    MMWR-MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT, 2020, 69 (32): : 1058 - 1063
  • [36] Oral health during pregnancy - An analysis of information collected by the pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system
    Gaffield, ML
    Gilbert, BJC
    Malvitz, DM
    Romaguera, R
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 132 (07): : 1009 - 1016
  • [37] Female fertility treatment and adverse birth outcomes: a multistate analysis of pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system data
    Uribe, Danielle
    Haak, Peterson
    Nechuta, Sarah
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (26): : 10591 - 10598
  • [38] Prenatal Cannabis Use and Infant Birth Outcomes in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System
    Nguyen, Victoria H.
    Harley, Kim G.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2022, 240 : 87 - 93
  • [39] Implementation Science and the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System
    Grigorescu, Violanda I.
    D'Angelo, Denise V.
    Harrison, Leslie L.
    Taraporewalla, Aspy J.
    Shulman, Holly
    Smith, Ruben A.
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2014, 23 (12) : 989 - 994
  • [40] Assessment of Assisted Reproductive Technology Use Questions: Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System Survey, 2004
    Barradas, Danielle T.
    Barfield, Wanda D.
    Wright, Victoria
    D'Angelo, Denise
    Manning, Susan E.
    Schieve, Laura A.
    PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2012, 127 (05) : 516 - 523