Postpartum Contraception Use by Urban/Rural Status: An Analysis of the Michigan Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System Data

被引:12
|
作者
Starr, Katherine A. [1 ]
Martins, Summer L. [1 ]
Watson, Sydeaka [2 ]
Gilliam, Melissa L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sect Family Planning & Contracept Res, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Hlth Studies, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
DELIVERY; OUTCOMES; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.whi.2015.06.014
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: We sought to examine rural/urban differences in postpartum contraceptive use, which are underexplored in the literature. Methods: We analyzed phase 5 (2004-2008) of the Michigan Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) survey. Using Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes and weighted multinomial logistic regression, we examined the association between self-reported postpartum contraceptive method and rural/urban residence among postpartum women not desiring pregnancy (n = 6,468). Results: Postpartum (mean, 16.5 weeks after delivery), 14.4% of respondents were using sterilization, 6.7% long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), 37.3% moderately effective hormonal methods, 38.4% less effective methods or no method, and 3.2% abstinence. Multivariable analysis yielded sporadic geographic patterns. Odds of method use varied significantly by age, parity, body mass index, and breastfeeding status. Not discussing contraception with a prenatal healthcare provider decreased odds of postpartum LARC use (odds ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.36-0.75). Number of prenatal visits and weeks since delivery were not associated with postpartum contraception method. Conclusions: We did not observe strong variation in postpartum contraceptive use based on geography. Low uptake of highly effective contraception across rural and urban areas suggests a need for education and outreach regarding these methods. Copyright (C) 2015 by the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:622 / 627
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] POSTPARTUM CONTRACEPTIVE USE BY URBAN/RURAL STATUS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE MICHIGAN PREGNANCY RISK ASSESSMENT MONITORING SYSTEM (PRAMS) DATA
    Damm, K.
    Martins, S.
    Gilliam, M.
    Watson, S.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2013, 88 (03) : 467 - 467
  • [2] Postpartum contraception:: the New Mexico Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System
    DePiñeres, T
    Blumenthal, PD
    Diener-West, M
    CONTRACEPTION, 2005, 72 (06) : 422 - 425
  • [3] UNDESIRED PREGNANCY, CONTRACEPTIVE COUNSELING AND POSTPARTUM CONTRACEPTION USE IN WOMEN WITH MEDICAL COMORBIDITIES: AN ANALYSIS OF DATA FROM THE MARYLAND PREGNANCY RISK ASSESSMENT MONITORING SYSTEM
    Perritt, J.
    Fox, M.
    Jamshidi, R.
    Wang, J.
    McDonald-Mosley, R.
    Burke, A. E.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2011, 84 (03) : 325 - 326
  • [4] Postpartum contraception:: A review of the New Mexico pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system
    DePiñeres, T
    Blumenthal, P
    Diener-West, M
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 105 (04): : 15S - 16S
  • [5] Contraception counseling, pregnancy intention and contraception use in women with medical problems: an analysis of data from the Maryland Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS)
    Perritt, Jamila B.
    Burke, Anne
    Jamshidli, Roxanne
    Wang, Jiangxia
    Fox, Michelle
    CONTRACEPTION, 2013, 88 (02) : 263 - 268
  • [6] POSTPARTUM UNINTENDED PREGNANCY AND CONTRACEPTION USE AMONG RURAL-TO-URBAN MIGRANT WOMEN IN SHANGHAI
    Huang, Y.
    Merkatz, R.
    Kang, J.
    Sitruk-Ware, R.
    Cheng, L.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2012, 85 (03) : 323 - 323
  • [7] Use of contraception among US women reporting postpartum depressive symptoms, pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system 2009-2011
    Lawley, Megan E.
    Haddad, Lisa
    Burley, Kim
    Farr, Sherry L.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2018, 97 (01) : 29 - 33
  • [8] Use of open-text responses to recode categorical survey data on postpartum contraception use among women in the United States: A mixed-methods inquiry of Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data
    Richards, Nicole K.
    Morley, Christopher P.
    Wojtowycz, Martha A.
    Bevec, Erin
    Levandowski, Brooke A.
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2022, 19 (01)
  • [9] Are Experiences of Racial Discrimination Associated with Postpartum Depressive Symptoms? A Multistate Analysis of Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System Data
    Weeks, Fiona
    Zapata, Jasmine
    Rohan, Angela
    Green, Tiffany
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2022, 31 (02) : 158 - 166
  • [10] Postpartum Depressive Symptoms: An Analysis of Social Determinants Using the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System
    O'Connor, Sarah
    Su, Lihchyun Joseph
    WOMENS HEALTH REPORTS, 2023, 4 (01): : 584 - 593