Environmental impact assessment based on group decision-making methods in mining projects

被引:55
|
作者
Rikhtegar, Navid [1 ]
Mansouri, Nabiollah [1 ]
Oroumieh, Amir Ahadi [2 ]
Yazdani-Chamzini, Abdolreza [3 ]
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras [4 ]
Kildiene, Simona [4 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Sci & Res Branch, Dept Environm & Energy, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran, Fac Management, Tehran, Iran
[3] Islamic Azad Univ, South Tehran Branch, Young Researchers & Elite Club, Tehran, Iran
[4] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Res Inst Smart Bldg Technol, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
来源
关键词
environmental impact assessment (EAI); analytic network process (ANP); MCDM; fuzzy simple additive weight (SAW); ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; MODEL; STRATEGIES; SELECTION; LOCATION; SYSTEM; IRAN;
D O I
10.1080/1331677X.2014.966971
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Mining operations usually comprise a spread spectrum of environmental challenges, which are often unique to each mine site. This is due to the fact that mining activities, directly or indirectly, have an adverse impact on environment and ecology. For this reason, the environmental impact assessment (EIA) process has been developed for evaluation of the possible impact of mine development and operations on the environment, including the natural, social and economic aspects. In this article, an EIA methodology based on analytic network process and fuzzy simple additive weight (SAW) is proposed to formulate the environmental risks pertaining to mining projects. In the system of the proposed model, the importance weights are calculated by an ANP process. Then, fuzzy SAW is employed to evaluate the preference ratings of the alternatives. The merit of using fuzzy logic is to handle the inherent uncertainty in modelling an EIA problem by simplifying the sophisticated structure of the problem under consideration. The proposed model is utilised to assess the environmental impact generated by zinc and lead mining projects located in Zanjan, Iran to shape the future industrial and mining structure of the region. Finally, the environmental impacts are ranked from the most to the least risky.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 392
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Rationality and the Environment, Decision-making in Environmental Politics and Assessment
    Frantzeskaki, Niki
    Thissen, Wil
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (04) : 1270 - 1272
  • [42] Overview of the study on group decision-making methods based on different judgement matrices
    Chen Xiao-hong
    Chen Ke
    Wang Jian-qiang
    [J]. 2008 CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-11, 2008, : 2276 - 2281
  • [43] DECISION-MAKING AND MONITORING IN MINING
    KORTELEV, OB
    KUZNETSOV, AS
    SYCHEV, VA
    IVANOV, YV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINING SCIENCE, 1992, 28 (03) : 286 - 294
  • [44] Group decision-making methods based on hesitant N-soft sets
    Akram, Muhammad
    Adeel, Arooj
    Alcantud, Jose Carlos R.
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2019, 115 : 95 - 105
  • [45] Methods for assigning weights to decision makers in group ahp decision-making
    Jankovic A.
    Popovic M.
    [J]. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2019, 2 (01): : 147 - 165
  • [46] Research on Governmental Decision-Making Model of Urban Infrastructure Projects Based on Grey Relational Decision-Making
    Wang Yujing
    Li Lin
    [J]. 2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC, EDUCATION AND MANAGEMENT (ICEEM2011), VOL I, 2011, : 534 - 537
  • [47] The impact of family group decision-making on preventing removals
    Lambert, Matthew C.
    Johnson, Leah E.
    Wang, Eugene W.
    [J]. CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2017, 78 : 89 - 92
  • [48] Sharing decision-making and group incentives: The impact on performance
    Sesil, James C.
    [J]. ECONOMIC AND INDUSTRIAL DEMOCRACY, 2006, 27 (04) : 587 - 607
  • [49] Application of optimized multi-criteria decision-making in an environmental impact assessment study
    Bose, P
    Chakrabarti, R
    [J]. CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2003, 20 (01) : 31 - 48
  • [50] IS EVIDENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT INCLUDED IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT AND DOES IT INFLUENCE DECISION-MAKING?
    Hubbert, L.
    Embleton, N.
    Wright, A.
    Nicholson, L.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S307 - S307