A cross-sectional study of secondary cardiac care in general practice: impact of personal and practice characteristics

被引:10
|
作者
Byrne, Molly
Murphy, Andrew W. [1 ]
Walsh, Jane C.
Shryane, Eithne
McGroarty, Mary
Kelleher, Cecily C.
机构
[1] Natl Univ Ireland, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Gen Practice, Galway, Ireland
[2] Natl Univ Ireland, Dept Psychol, Galway, Ireland
[3] Univ Coll Dublin, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Dublin, Ireland
[4] Flinders Univ S Australia, Dept Gen Practice, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[5] Univ Adelaide, Dept Gen Practice, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
关键词
angina; arteriogram; lipid lowering; statin; secondary prevention; coronary heart disease;
D O I
10.1093/fampra/cml003
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective. To determine the impact of patient (age, gender, type of and time since diagnosis) and practice (rurality, number of partners, availability of practice nurse) characteristics on secondary cardiac care in general practice in a country without universal registration. Methods. Medical and demographic data were gathered from the medical charts of 1611 eligible patients from 35 randomly selected practices. Eligible patients were aged under 80 years with a recorded history of acute myocardial infarction, percutaneous trans coronary arteriogram or angina. Self-report data about diet, exercise, smoking and alcohol consumption were provided from postal questionnaire (1084 patients responded; 69% response rate). Results. Having an angina only diagnosis significantly decreased the likelihood of patients being prescribed aspirin (OR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.40-0.69), lipid-lowering medication (OR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.43-0.69) or ACE inhibitors (OR = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.48-0.81). Younger patients (OR = 1.05; 95% CI = 1.04-1.06) were also more likely to be prescribed lipid-lowering medication. Cholesterol was predicted by gender only, with females having significantly higher cholesterol (B = -0.41; 95% CI = -0.54 to -0.27). The number of missed opportunities for secondary cardiac care was greater among patients with angina only (B = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.19-0.60). The amount of variance explained by practice and patient variables overall for each of the measures was small, ranging from 2 to 6%. Conclusions. Practice size or location appears to have little impact on secondary cardiac care. The most consistent significant personal characteristic finding was that patients with a diagnosis of angina only were significantly less likely to receive aspirin, statins or ACE inhibitors and more likely to have more missed opportunities for secondary cardiac care.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 302
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Connected Health Devices for Health Care in French General Medicine Practice: Cross-Sectional Study
    El Amrani, Leila
    Engberink, Agnes Oude
    Ninot, Gregory
    Hayot, Maurice
    Carbonnel, Francois
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2017, 5 (12):
  • [22] Patients' experiences of the use of point-of-care ultrasound in general practice - a cross-sectional study
    Andersen, Camilla Aakjaer
    Brodersen, John
    Rudbaek, Torsten Rahbek
    Jensen, Martin Bach
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [23] Compliance with referrals to medical specialist care: patient and general practice determinants: a cross-sectional study
    van Dijk, Christel E.
    de Jong, Judith D.
    Verheij, Robert A.
    Jansen, Tessa
    Korevaar, Joke C.
    de Bakker, Dinny H.
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2016, 17
  • [24] Compliance with referrals to medical specialist care: patient and general practice determinants: a cross-sectional study
    Christel E. van Dijk
    Judith D. de Jong
    Robert A. Verheij
    Tessa Jansen
    Joke C. Korevaar
    Dinny H. de Bakker
    [J]. BMC Family Practice, 17
  • [25] Measuring the complexity of general practice consultations: a Delphi and cross-sectional study in English primary care
    Salisbury, Chris
    Lay-Flurrie, Sarah
    Bankhead, Clare R.
    Fuller, Alice
    Murphy, Mairead
    Caddick, Barbara
    Ordonez-Mena, Jose M.
    Holt, Tim
    Nicholson, Brian D.
    Perera, Rafael
    Hobbs, F. D. Richard
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2021, 71 (707): : E423 - E431
  • [26] Are general practice characteristics predictors of good glycaemic control in patients with diabetes? A cross-sectional study
    Esterman, Adrian J.
    Fountaine, Tim
    McDermott, Robyn
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2016, 204 (01) : 23 - U46
  • [28] The Impact of the 2019 European Guideline for Cardiovascular Risk Management: A Cross-Sectional Study in General Practice
    Meier, Rahel
    Rachamin, Yael
    Rosemann, Thomas
    Markun, Stefan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (07) : 1 - 12
  • [29] Sleep in General Practice: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Primary Care Across India
    Ghoshal, A. G.
    Dhar, R.
    Halder, I.
    Ghosh, S.
    Ghoshal, A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 199
  • [30] Investigation of fatigue by Australian general practice registrars: a cross-sectional study
    Morgan, Simon
    Henderson, Kim M.
    Tapley, Amanda
    Thomson, Allison
    Wilson, Jessica
    Scott, John
    Spike, Neil A.
    McArthur, Lawrie
    van Driel, Mieke L.
    Magin, Parker J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2015, 7 (02) : 109 - 116