Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Select Waste to Energy Technology for a Mega City: The Case of Moscow

被引:32
|
作者
Kurbatova, Anna [1 ]
Abu-Qdais, Hani Ahmed [2 ]
机构
[1] Peoples Friendship Univ Russia, Fac Ecol, Dept Ecol Monitoring & Forecasting, RUDN Univ, 6 Miklukho Maklaya St, Moscow 117198, Russia
[2] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Civil Engn Dept, POB 3030, Irbid 22110, Jordan
关键词
waste to energy; Moscow; mega city; analytical hierarchy process (AHP); sensitivity;
D O I
10.3390/su12239828
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In a mega city like Moscow, both municipal solid waste management and energy systems are managed in an unsustainable way. Therefore, utilizing the municipal solid waste to generate energy will help the city in achieving sustainability by decreasing greenhouse gases emissions and the need for land to dispose the solid waste. In this study, various Waste to Energy (WTE) options were evaluated using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to select the most appropriate technology for the Moscow region. The developed AHP model consists of 4 levels, which assessed four WTE technologies, namely landfill biogas, anaerobic digestion, incineration, and refuse derived fuel (RDF), using four criteria and nine subcriteria. The pairwise comparison was achieved by soliciting 16 experts' opinions. The priority weights of various criteria, subcriteria, and alternatives were determined using Expert Choice Software. The developed model indicated that landfill biogas is the preferred option with a global weight of 0.448, followed by the anaerobic digestion with a weight of 0.320 and incineration with a weight of 0.138, while the least preferred technology is the RDF with a weight of 0.094. Sensitivity analysis has shown that the priorities of WTE alternatives are sensitive for the environmental and technical criteria. The developed AHP model can be used by the decision makers in Moscow in the field of WTE.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1 / 18
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluating solid waste landfill site selection using multi-criteria decision analysis and geographic information systems in the city of Elazig, Turkey
    Celiker, Murat
    Yildiz, Osman
    Nacar Kocer, Nilufer
    PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI MUHENDISLIK BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2019, 25 (06): : 683 - 691
  • [42] Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making to optimise solid waste management
    Garcia-Garcia G.
    Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 2022, 37
  • [43] A Multi-criteria Methodology to Select the Best Wave Energy Sites
    Martinez, Andre
    Ben Mustapha, Zied
    Campbell, Rose
    Bouragba, Tarik
    2016 WORLD CONGRESS ON SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGIES (WCST), 2016, : 115 - 116
  • [44] Application of a multi-criteria decision model to select of design choices for WWTPs
    M. Garrido-Baserba
    R. Reif
    M. Molinos-Senante
    L. Larrea
    A. Castillo
    M. Verdaguer
    M. Poch
    Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2016, 18 : 1097 - 1109
  • [45] Prioritizing desalination strategies using multi-criteria decision analysis
    Afify, Assem
    DESALINATION, 2010, 250 (03) : 928 - 935
  • [46] Identifying a preservation zone using multi-criteria decision analysis
    Farashi, A.
    Naderi, M.
    Parvian, N.
    ANIMAL BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2016, 39 (01) : 29 - 36
  • [47] City sustainability evaluation using multi-criteria decision making with objective weights of interdependent criteria
    Zhang, Ling
    Xu, Yan
    Yeh, Chung-Hsing
    Liu, Yao
    Zhou, Dequn
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 131 : 491 - 499
  • [48] Application of a multi-criteria decision model to select of design choices for WWTPs
    Garrido-Baserba, M.
    Reif, R.
    Molinos-Senante, M.
    Larrea, L.
    Castillo, A.
    Verdaguer, M.
    Poch, M.
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2016, 18 (04) : 1097 - 1109
  • [49] Supporting bidding decision using multi-criteria analysis methods
    Lesniak, Agnieszka
    Radziejowska, Aleksandra
    INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS IN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT: FLEXIBILITY IN SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION, 2017, 208 : 76 - 81
  • [50] CLASSIFYING NANOMATERIAL RISKS USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS
    Linkov, I.
    Steevens, J.
    Chappell, M.
    Tervonen, T.
    Figueira, J. R.
    Merad, M.
    NANOMATERIALS: RISKS AND BENEFITS, 2009, : 179 - +