Expert centred vs learner centred approach for evaluating quality and reusability of learning objects

被引:27
|
作者
Kurilovas, Eugenijus [1 ,2 ]
Serikoviene, Silvija [1 ,3 ]
Vuorikari, Riina [4 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius State Univ, Inst Math & Informat, LT-08663 Vilnius, Lithuania
[2] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
[3] Kaunas Univ Technol, Panevezys Inst, LT-35212 Panevezys, Lithuania
[4] European Schoolnet, B-1040 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
ICT's for human capital; Learning objects; Learners' behaviour; Social tagging; Quality criteria; Reusability; SEMANTIC WEB; FRAMEWORK; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.047
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The aim of the paper is to present and compare so-called bottom-up and top-down approaches for evaluating quality and reusability of learning objects (LOs). The paper proposes bottom-up methodology that outlines the central role of learners' individual and social behaviour while working with LOs. This includes social tagging and some parameters of interaction for measuring context to describe LOs usage, attention, and other aspects of the context as well as helps to exploit context data towards making LOs repositories more useful, and thus enhance the reuse. The paper also presents top-down methodology for the expert evaluation of LOs quality and reusability. This methodology consists of consecutive application of several scientific approaches, methods, and principles. The authors investigate how these two different, however complimentary approaches for evaluating LOs quality and reusability can be better applied for the aims of eQNet project in order to select reusable ("travel well") LOs for implementing in different educational contexts and countries. These approaches could be considered as suitable applications of information and communication technologies (ICT's) for development of human capital. The examples of practical application of these approaches for evaluating LOs quality and reusability in eQNet project are also presented in the paper. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 534
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RECALL: Towards a learner centred approach to language learning
    Murphy, M
    Kruger, A
    Grieszl, A
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION: KNOWLEDGE AND MEDIA IN LEARNING SYSTEMS, 1997, 39 : 627 - 630
  • [2] Methodology for Evaluating Quality and Reusability of Learning Objects
    Kurilovas, Eugenijus
    Bireniene, Virginija
    Serikoviene, Silvija
    [J]. ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF E-LEARNING, 2011, 9 (01): : 39 - 51
  • [3] Robots for Learning - Learner Centred Design
    Johal, Wafa
    Bruno, Barbara
    Olsen, Jennifer K.
    Chetouani, Mohamed
    Lemaignan, Severin
    Sandygulova, Anara
    [J]. HRI '21: COMPANION OF THE 2021 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION, 2021, : 715 - 716
  • [4] A learner centred approach to online education
    Gretton, Nichola
    [J]. OPEN LEARNING, 2015, 30 (02): : 190 - 191
  • [5] Teaching geographical databases at the engineering master level: learner-centred approach vs. teacher-centred approach
    Di Felice, Paolino
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2018, 43 (05) : 757 - 770
  • [7] From learner-centred to learning-centred: Becoming a 'hybrid' practitioner
    Bremner, Nicholas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 97 : 53 - 64
  • [8] Learning: Student-centred vs teacher-centred
    Boyapati, E
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2000, 17 (03) : 365 - 367
  • [9] Learning: Student-centred vs teacher-centred
    Ed Boyapati
    [J]. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2000, 17 : 365 - 367
  • [10] DESIGNING NEW CURRICULUM; A LEARNER CENTRED APPROACH
    Rice, Rosalind
    Chambers, Derek
    Walker, Wendy
    [J]. EDULEARN12: 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2012, : 1225 - 1232