Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: A Scientific Review

被引:24
|
作者
Lewin, John M. [1 ]
Patel, Bhavika K. [2 ]
Tanna, Aneri [3 ]
机构
[1] Womens Imaging Ctr, Denver, CO 80209 USA
[2] Mayo Clin Arizona, Dept Radiol, Phoenix, AZ USA
[3] Duke Univ, Durham, NC USA
关键词
mammography; contrast agent; breast cancer; review article; FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; HIGH FAMILIAL RISK; SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; BREAST-CANCER; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; REPLACEMENT THERAPY; MRI; ACCURACY; WOMEN; CESM;
D O I
10.1093/jbi/wbz074
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In this paper we provide an overview of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and a review of the published literature in order to provide a picture of the current state of the evidence on the performance of CEM. Clinical research was fairly sparse following the demonstration of the technique in research subjects about 18 years ago, but the number of publications rapidly increased following commercialization 9 years ago, and even more so in the last 5 years. Initial studies compared CEM with mammography, and clearly showed that CEM could detect cancers not visible on mammography. More recent studies have primarily focused on comparing the performance of CEM with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in selected cohorts. These studies have almost uniformly shown CEM and MRI to have similar sensitivities, with sensitivity and accuracy showing more variability from study to study. With increasing clinical use, a large number of retrospective reviews of CEM have appeared, showing utility of CEM in the diagnostic clinical setting. Most recently, a small number of papers have been published looking at CEM for high-risk and dense breast screening, two potentially large applications of the technique, showing it to outperform mammography in both populations. CEM has clearly been shown to have clinical utility, but more prospective studies, including screening studies, are needed to further evaluate its performance, especially in comparison with MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 15
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Review of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography
    Lorente-Ramos, Rosa M.
    Azpeitia Arman, Javier
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, 2022, 45 (19)
  • [2] Contrast-enhanced mammography
    Fallenberg, Eva M.
    [J]. RADIOLOGE, 2021, 61 (02): : 177 - 182
  • [3] Clinical utility of contrast-enhanced mammography: A literature review
    Travieso-Aja, Maria del Mar
    Perez-Luzardo, Octavio
    [J]. REVISTA DE SENOLOGIA Y PATOLOGIA MAMARIA, 2022, 35 (04): : 293 - 304
  • [4] Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography
    Wong, Christopher Yung Yuen
    Lee, Shu Yi Sonia
    Mahmood, Rameysh Danovani
    [J]. SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 65 (03) : 195 - 201
  • [5] Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography
    Jochelson, Maxine
    [J]. RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 52 (03) : 609 - +
  • [6] The Future of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography
    Covington, Matthew F.
    Pizzitola, Victor J.
    Lorans, Roxanne
    Pockaj, Barbara A.
    Northfelt, Donald W.
    Appleton, Catherine M.
    Patel, Bhavika K.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (02) : 292 - 300
  • [7] Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography
    Monreal, Sherri
    [J]. RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 89 (05) : 518 - 520
  • [8] Contrast-enhanced digital mammography
    Dromain, Clarisse
    Balleyguier, Corinne
    Adler, Ghazal
    Garbay, Jean Remi
    Delaloge, Suzette
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 69 (01) : 34 - 42
  • [9] Contrast-enhanced Mammography versus Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Potsch, Nina
    Vatteroni, Giulia
    Clauser, Paola
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Baltzer, Pascal A. T.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2022, 305 (01) : 93 - 105
  • [10] Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: Technique, Indications, and Review of Current Literature
    Gemmy Hannsun
    Stephen Saponaro
    Paul Sylvan
    Azadeh Elmi
    [J]. Current Radiology Reports, 9