Controlling the Courts: New Public Management and the Dutch Judiciary

被引：12

作者：

Visser, Max ^{[1
]}

Schouteten, Roel ^{[1
]}

Dikkers, Josje ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Management Res, POB 9108, NL-6500 HK Nijmegen, Netherlands

[2] Univ Appl Sci Utrecht, Inst Work & Org, Utrecht, Netherlands

来源：

JUSTICE SYSTEM JOURNAL | 2019年 / 40卷 / 01期

关键词：

New Public Management; management control; Dutch judiciary; quality; job demands; job resources; PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH-CARE; ACCOUNTABILITY; MANAGERIALISM; CYBERNETICS; PRINCIPLES; JUDGES;

D O I：

10.1080/0098261X.2018.1539645

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

Like many public sector organizations, in the past decades the Dutch judiciary has come to adopt New Public Management (NPM) practices and processes. In this article, we analyze this adoption from a management and organizational control perspective. Using data from a large survey among Dutch judges, we see a mismatch between the nature of the NPM-inspired management control systems and the work-related experiences of the judges and inquire into the consequences thereof for judicial work and organization.

引用

页码：39 / 53

页数：15

共 50 条

[41] Styles of public asset management in Dutch regional water management
van Buuren, M. W.
Bil, J. A.
Roovers, G. J.
[J]. LIFE-CYCLE OF ENGINEERING SYSTEMS: EMPHASIS ON SUSTAINABLE CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE, 2017, : 575 - 581
[42] The Dutch way of New Public Management A critical perspective on quality assurance in higher education
Enders, Juergen
Westerheijden, Don F.
[J]. POLICY AND SOCIETY, 2014, 33 (03) : 189 - 198
[43] The judiciary and public policies in Brazil
Taylor, Matthew M.
[J]. DADOS-REVISTA DE CIENCIAS SOCIAIS, 2007, 50 (02): : 229 - 257
[44] THE JUDICIARY AND THE PUBLIC: JUDICIAL PERCEPTIONS
Mack, Kathy
Anleu, Sharyn Roach
Tutton, Jordan
[J]. ADELAIDE LAW REVIEW, 2018, 39 (01): : 1 - 35
[45] JUDICIARY AND PUBLIC SCHOOL FINANCING
PIOUS, RM
[J]. CURRENT HISTORY, 1972, 63 (372): : 53 - &
[46] An inquiry into the blurring boundaries between professionals and paraprofessionals in Dutch courts and the public prosecution service
Holvast, N. L.
Lindeman, J. M. W.
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW IN CONTEXT, 2020, 16 (04) : 371 - 389
[47] THE NEW JUDICIARY
Ambrose, W. J. L.
[J]. LAW QUARTERLY REVIEW, 1910, 26 (103): : 203 - 214
[48] Unnecessary and Misconceived: Some Reflections on the Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Bill
McCluskey, John
[J]. EDINBURGH LAW REVIEW, 2008, 12 (02) : 288 - 293
[49] Gender Attitudes in the Judiciary: Evidence from US Circuit Courts
Ash, Elliott
Chen, Daniel l.
Ornaghi, Arianna
[J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024, 16 (01) : 314 - 350
[50] COURTS, CONGRESS, JUDICIARY - ONE IS MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS
STRONG, FR
[J]. AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1974, 60 (OCT): : 1203 - 1206

← 1 2 3 4 5 →