A review of performance indicators for real losses from water supply systems

被引:135
|
作者
Lambert, AO
Brown, TG
Takizawa, M
Weimer, D
机构
[1] Tokyo Metropolitan Waterworks Japan, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Neckarwerke Stuttgart AG, Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.2166/aqua.1999.0025
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The IWA's Task Force on Unaccounted-for Water (UFW) had two key objectives. The first-Recommendations for a standard international terminology for calculation of real and apparent losses from water balance-is presented as a Blue Pages [1]. As the second-to review performance indicators (PIs) for international comparisons of losses in water supply systems-is only briefly mentioned in the Blue Pages, this AQUA paper explains the technical basis for the task force's recommendations on PIs for real (physical) losses. Traditional PIs were checked against several key local factors which constrain performance in managing real losses. 'Number of service connections' was found to be the most consistent of the traditional PIs over the greatest range of density of service connections, and is recommended as the preferred basic traditional technical indicator for real losses (TIRL). However, TIRL does not take account of several key local factors. To overcome this deficiency, TIRL should be compared with an estimate of unavoidable annual real losses (UARL). An auditable component-based approach is developed and satisfactorily tested for predicting UARL for any system, taking into account the local factors and using international data. The infrastructure leakage index (ILI), calculated as the ratio of TIRL to UARL, is a nondimensional PI, which enables overall infrastructure management performance in control of real losses to be assessed independently of the current operating pressures; minimum achievable operating pressures are usually constrained by local topography and standards of service.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 237
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] WATER LOSSES IN WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM
    Uzar, Josip
    TEHNICKI GLASNIK-TECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 6 (02): : 213 - 218
  • [22] Modeling of hydraulic and energy efficiency indicators for water supply systems
    Nogueira Vilanova, Mateus Ricardo
    Perrella Balestieri, Jose Antonio
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 48 : 540 - 557
  • [23] Review of research on performance indicators for water utilities
    Sakai, Hiroshi
    AQUA-WATER INFRASTRUCTURE ECOSYSTEMS AND SOCIETY, 2024, 73 (02) : 167 - 182
  • [24] Key performance indicators of hospital supply chain: a systematic review
    Meysam Fallahnezhad
    Mostafa Langarizadeh
    Afshin Vahabzadeh
    BMC Health Services Research, 24 (1)
  • [25] Service level indicators evaluation of water supply systems: water users' perspective
    Odjegba, Enovwo
    Oluwasanya, Grace
    Shittu, Olufunke
    Idowu, Olufemi
    Brion, Gail
    URBAN WATER JOURNAL, 2023, 20 (10) : 1532 - 1540
  • [26] Analysis of Water Losses and Assessment of Initiatives Aimed at Their Reduction in Selected Water Supply Systems
    Ociepa, Ewa
    Mrowiec, Maciej
    Deska, Iwona
    WATER, 2019, 11 (05)
  • [27] A review of energy consumption in water supply systems
    Abe, B. T.
    Shrivastava, P.
    Moloi, K.
    2019 IEEE AFRICON, 2019,
  • [28] Measuring Welfare Losses from Urban Water Supply Disruptions
    Buck, Steven
    Auffhammer, Maximilian
    Hamilton, Stephen
    Sunding, David
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2016, 3 (03) : 743 - 778
  • [29] Performance indicators model assessment for water system quality and supply in Montenegro
    Doklestic, Olivera
    Miloradov, Mirjana Vojinovic
    Elezovic, Natasa
    Kolakovic, Srdan
    Simeunovic, Nenad
    JOURNAL OF THE SERBIAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 89 (05) : 705 - 714
  • [30] Investigating the relations between performance indicators of urban water supply in India
    Bandari, Adithya
    Sadhukhan, Shubhajit
    URBAN WATER JOURNAL, 2022, 19 (10) : 999 - 1014