Comparative life cycle assessment of tubular wind towers and foundations - Part 2: Life cycle analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Gervasio, H. [1 ]
Rebelo, C. [1 ]
Moura, A. [1 ]
Veljkovic, M. [2 ]
Simoes da Silva, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coimbra, Dept Civil Engn, ISISE, P-3004516 Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Lulea Univ Technol, S-97187 Lulea, Sweden
关键词
Wind turbine; Concrete; Steel; Hybrid; Tower; Foundation; Life cycle; Environmental impact; TURBINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.02.041
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In the first part of the paper the design of tubular towers and respective onshore foundations was addressed. The considered solutions were based on steel, concrete and hybrid steel-concrete tubular towers supporting multi-megawatt turbines of 2, 3.6 and 5 MW power with hub heights of 80, 100 and 150 m respectively. In this second part of the paper, the life cycle analysis of the designed case studies is performed and conclusions about their environmental impact are drawn. Two different scenarios concerning the lifetime of the towers were established. The first scenario considers 20 years lifetime and two different construction methods for the connection of the steel segments, the first based in current technology using flange connections and the second using newly developed friction connections. Assuming equal importance for all environmental categories in this scenario, it may be concluded that for heights up to 100 m hybrid towers with friction connections are the most efficient solution. For higher heights, the concrete tower becomes more efficient. The second scenario considers an increased total lifetime of 40 years, assuming the reuse of the tower after 20 years of operation. In this case, the use of friction connections in steel towers enhances the possibility of dismantling and reusing the tower potentiating much better performance in relation to the environmental category of global warming. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 299
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative life cycle assessment and social life cycle assessment of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius
    Foolmaun, Rajendra Kumar
    Ramjeeawon, Toolseeram
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (01): : 155 - 171
  • [32] Comparative life cycle assessment and social life cycle assessment of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius
    Rajendra Kumar Foolmaun
    Toolseeram Ramjeeawon
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 : 155 - 171
  • [33] LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS ASSESSMENT
    SULLIVAN, JL
    YOUNG, SB
    [J]. ADVANCED MATERIALS & PROCESSES, 1995, 147 (02): : 37 - 40
  • [34] Manufacturing and Recycling Impact on Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Innovative Wind Power Plant Part 2/2
    Baldowska-Witos, Patrycja
    Doerffer, Krzysztof
    Pysz, Michal
    Doerffer, Piotr
    Tomporowski, Andrzej
    Opielak, Marek
    [J]. MATERIALS, 2021, 14 (01) : 1 - 21
  • [35] Life-cycle cost structural design optimization of steel wind towers
    Lagaros, Nikos D.
    Karlaftis, Matthew G.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2016, 174 : 122 - 132
  • [36] Life Cycle Assessment of Dernah (Libya) wind farm
    Al-Behadili, S. H.
    El-Osta, W. B.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2015, 83 : 1227 - 1233
  • [37] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF MODERN WIND POWER PLANTS
    Hapke, Hannes M.
    Haapala, Karl R.
    Wu, Zhaohui
    Brekken, Ted K. A.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, DETC 2010, VOL 6, 2010, : 395 - 403
  • [38] Life Cycle Assessment of the wind farm alpha ventus
    Wagner, H. -J.
    [J]. NEW STRATEGIES FOR ENERGY GENERATION, CONVERSION AND STORAGE, 2013, 54
  • [39] Life cycle assessment of a floating offshore wind turbine
    Weinzettel, Jan
    Reenaas, Marte
    Solli, Christian
    Hertwich, Edgar G.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2009, 34 (03) : 742 - 747
  • [40] Life cycle assessment of a wind farm and related externalities
    Schleisner, L
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2000, 20 (03) : 279 - 288