Signal competition in heterodyne interferometry

被引:0
|
作者
de La Rochefoucauld, Ombeline [1 ]
Khanna, Shyam M. [1 ]
Olson, Elizabeth S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Fowler Mem Lab, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
heterodyne interferometry; signal competition; cochlea; FM receiver;
D O I
10.1117/12.693112
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
The Organ of Corti is a complex structure with many reflecting surfaces characterized by a wide range of reflectivities. Heterodyne interferometry has been the primary technique for measuring motion of the cochlear sensory tissue for some time. We would like to know under what conditions reflections from out-of-focus surfaces affect the measured velocity of the in-focus surface. Heterodyne interferometry uses interference between two laser beams (object and reference). The velocity of the test object shifts the frequency of the object beam due to the Doppler effect. The heterodyne signal (a frequency modulated (FM) wave) is decoded using a frequency demodulator. By reviewing the theory of FM demodulation and showing tests with our Revox FM demodulator, we demonstrate that the influence of a secondary signal on a measurement depends on the modulation index (ratio of the frequency deviation (Delta f=V-o/lambda) to the modulation frequency, f(m) where V-o is the velocity amplitude and lambda, is the laser wavelength). For high-modulation-index signals, the fundamental component of the FM demodulator output is not affected by a secondary signal unless the secondary signal's power is nearly as large as that of the primary signal. However, the output waveform can be distorted. For a low-modulation-index signal, a secondary competing signal can have a relatively large effect on the fundamental component of the output signal, but the output signal waveform is not distorted. The results underscore the benefit of steep optical sectioning to reduce contamination by out-of-focus signals.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] TEMPORAL COHERENCE DETERMINED BY HETERODYNE INTERFEROMETRY
    HALMOS, MJ
    SHAMIR, J
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1981, 71 (12) : 1625 - 1626
  • [32] Spatial heterodyne interferometry with polarization gratings
    Kudenov, Michael W.
    Miskiewicz, Matthew N.
    Escuti, Michael J.
    Dereniak, Eustace L.
    OPTICS LETTERS, 2012, 37 (21) : 4413 - 4415
  • [33] Constant amplitude modulation heterodyne interferometry
    Liu, Heshan
    Wang, Juan
    Gao, Ruihong
    Luo, Ziren
    APPLIED OPTICS, 2022, 61 (28) : 8493 - 8499
  • [34] USE OF HETERODYNE INTERFEROMETRY IN OPTICAL TESTING
    WYANT, JC
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1974, 64 (10) : 1363 - 1363
  • [35] SPATIOTEMPORAL FREQUENCY MULTIPLEX HETERODYNE INTERFEROMETRY
    TAKEDA, M
    KITOH, M
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1992, 9 (09) : 1607 - 1614
  • [36] METHOD OF VIBRATION MEASUREMENTS IN HETERODYNE INTERFEROMETRY
    STETSON, K
    OPTICS LETTERS, 1982, 7 (05) : 233 - 234
  • [37] Nanoscale defect detection by heterodyne interferometry
    Lin, Haoshan
    Li, Yuhe
    Wang, Dongsheng
    Tong, Xiaolei
    Liu, Mei
    APPLIED OPTICS, 2009, 48 (08) : 1502 - 1506
  • [38] VISUALIZATION OF ULTRASONIC FIELDS BY HETERODYNE INTERFEROMETRY
    CASULA, O
    ROYER, D
    JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE IV, 1994, 4 (C5): : 1217 - 1220
  • [39] Heterodyne temporal speckle pattern interferometry
    Tiziani, HJ
    Kothiyal, MP
    Joenathan, C
    Haible, P
    18TH CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION FOR OPTICS: OPTICS FOR THE NEXT MILLENNIUM, TECHNICAL DIGEST, 1999, 3749 : 180 - 181
  • [40] Periodic Error Correction in Heterodyne Interferometry
    Schmitz, Tony L.
    Ganguly, Vasishta
    Yun, Janet
    Loughridge, Russell
    2013 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2013, : 3712 - 3716