The effect of femoral stem collar on implant migration and clinical outcomes following direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty A RANDOMIZED TRIAL

被引:15
|
作者
Perelgut, M. E. [1 ]
Polus, J. S. [1 ]
Lanting, B. A. [1 ]
Teeter, M. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] London Hlth Sci Ctr, London, ON, Canada
来源
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL | 2020年 / 102B卷 / 12期
关键词
REVISION; RISK; MICROMOTION; COMPONENT; FIXATION; FRACTURE; IMPROVE; RSA;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.102B12.BJJ-2019-1428.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims The direct anterior (DA) approach has been associated with rapid patient recovery after total hip arthroplasty (THA) but may be associated with more frequent femoral complications including implant loosening. The objective of this study was to determine whether the addition of a collar to the femoral stem affects implant migration, patient activity, and patient function following primary THA using the DA approach. Methods Patients were randomized to either a collared (n = 23) or collarless (n = 26) cementless femoral stem implanted using the DA approach. Canal fill ratio (CFR) was measured on the first postoperative radiographs. Patients underwent a supine radiostereometric analysis (RSA) exam postoperatively on the day of surgery and at two, four, six, 12, 26, and 52 weeks postoperatively. Patient-reported outcome measures (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index, the 12-item Short Form Health Survey Mental and Physical Score, and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score) were measured preoperatively and at each post-surgery clinic visit. Activity and function were also measured as the weekly average step count recorded by an activity tracker, and an instrumented timed up-and-go (TUG) test in clinic, respectively. Results Comparing the RSA between the day of surgery baseline exam to two weeks postoperatively, subsidence was significantly lower (mean difference 2.23 mm (SD 0.71), p = 0.023) with collared stems, though these patients had a greater CFR (p = 0.048). There was no difference (p = 0.426) in subsidence between stems from a two-week baseline through to one year postoperatively. There were no clinically relevant differences in PROMs; and there was no difference in the change in activity (p = 0.078) or the change in functional capacity (p = 0.664) between the collared stem group and the collarless stem group at any timepoint. Conclusion Presence of a collar on the femoral stem resulted in reduced subsidence during the first two postoperative weeks following primary THA using the DA approach. However, the clinical implications are unclear, and larger studies examining patient activity and outcomes are required.
引用
收藏
页码:1654 / 1661
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The biomechanical effect of the collar of a femoral stem on total hip arthroplasty
    Jeon, Insu
    Bae, Ji-Yong
    Park, Jin-Hong
    Yoon, Taek-Rim
    Todo, Mitsugu
    Mawatari, Masaaki
    Hotokebuchi, Takao
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 14 (01) : 103 - 112
  • [2] Femoral nerve palsy following primary total hip arthroplasty with the direct anterior approach
    Hoshino, Chisato
    Koga, Daisuke
    Koyano, Gaku
    Yamauchi, Yuki
    Sakai, Tomoko
    Okawa, Atsushi
    Jinno, Tetsuya
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (05):
  • [3] Direct anterior versus posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a multicentre, prospective, randomized clinical trial
    Moerenhout, Kevin
    Derome, Pascale
    Laflamme, G. Yves
    Leduc, Stephane
    Gaspard, Henry S.
    Benoit, Benoit
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 63 (05) : E412 - E417
  • [4] Femoral stem migration after direct lateral and direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study
    Polus, Jennifer S.
    Perelgut, Maxwell E.
    Vasarhelyi, Edward M.
    Teeter, Matthew G.
    Lanting, Brent A.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 65 (04) : E487 - E495
  • [5] How to Estimate Femoral Stem Anteversion During Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Gold, Peter A.
    McCarthy, Thomas F.
    Borukhov, Ilya
    Danoff, Jonathan
    [J]. ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2024, 26
  • [6] Direct Anterior Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures
    Greenstein, Alexander S.
    Soles, Gillian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2020, 34 : S23 - S24
  • [7] Recovery and outcomes of direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty
    Barry, Jeffrey J.
    Masonis, John L.
    Mason, J. Bohannon
    [J]. ANNALS OF JOINT, 2018, 3 (06):
  • [8] Effect of pamidronate on bone turnover and implant migration after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized trial
    Wilkinson, JM
    Eagleton, AC
    Stockley, I
    Peel, NFA
    Hamer, AJ
    Eastell, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2005, 23 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [9] Clinical outcomes following direct anterior approach during total hip arthroplasty without hip extension: a retrospective comparative study
    Xiong, Hua-zhang
    Xiang, Kuan
    Liu, Xiu-qi
    Jin, Ying
    Zhong, He-he
    Wu, Shu-hong
    Peng, Jia-chen
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [10] Risk of stem undersizing with direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty
    Rivera, Fabrizio
    Leonardi, Francesco
    Evangelista, Andrea
    Pierannunzii, Luca
    [J]. HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 26 (03) : 249 - 253