Continuous pralidoxime infusion versus repeated bolus injection to treat organophosphorus pesticide poisoning: a randomised controlled trial

被引:104
|
作者
Pawar, Kirti S.
Bhoite, Ramesh R.
Pillay, Chandrakant P.
Chavan, Sujata C.
Malshikare, Dhananjay S.
Garad, Saraswati G.
机构
[1] Giriraj Hosp, Baramati 413102, Maharashtra, India
[2] Intens Care Unit, Baramati 413102, Maharashtra, India
[3] BJ Med Coll, Dept Prevent & Social Med, Pune, Maharashtra, India
来源
LANCET | 2006年 / 368卷 / 9553期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69862-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The role of oximes for the treatment of organophosphorus pesticide poisoning has not been conclusively established. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a constant pralidoxime infusion compared with repeated bolus doses to treat patients with moderately severe poisoning from organophosphorus pesticides. Methods 200 patients were recruited to our single-centre, open randomised controlled trial after moderately severe poisoning by anticholinesterase pesticide. All were given a 2 g loading dose of pralidoxime over 30 min. Patients were then randomly assigned to control and study groups. Controls were given a bolus dose of 1 g pralidoxime over 1 h every 4 h for 48 h. The study group had a constant infusion of 1 g over an hour every hour for 48 h. Thereafter, all patients were given 1 g every 4 h until they could be weaned from ventilators. Analysis was by intention to treat. Primary outcome measures were median atropine dose needed within 24 h, proportion of patients who needed intubation, and number of days on ventilation. The study is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov with the identifier NCT00333944. Findings 100 patients were assigned the high-dose regimen, and 100 the control regimen. There were no drop-outs. Patients receiving the high-dose pralidoxime regimen required less atropine during the first 24 h than controls (median 6 mg vs 30 mg; difference 24 mg [95% CI 24-26, p<0.0001]). 88 (88%) and 64 (64%) of controls and high-dose patients, respectively, needed intubation during admission to hospital (relative risk=0.72, 0.62-0.86, p=0.0001). Control patients required ventilatory support for longer (median 10 days vs 5 days; difference 5 days [5-6, p<0.0001]). Interpretation A high-dose regimen of pralidoxime, consisting of a constant infusion of 1 g/h for 48 h after a 2 g loading dose, reduces morbidity and mortality in moderately severe cases of acute organophosphorus-pesticide poisoning.
引用
收藏
页码:2136 / 2141
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intravenous salbutamol bolus compared with an aminophylline infusion in children with severe asthma: a randomised controlled trial
    Roberts, G
    Newsom, D
    Gomez, K
    Raffles, A
    Saglani, S
    Begent, J
    Lachman, P
    Sloper, K
    Buchdahl, R
    Habel, A
    THORAX, 2003, 58 (04) : 306 - 310
  • [32] CONTINUOUS INFUSION VERSUS INTERMITTENT BOLUS INJECTION OF BLEOMYCIN IN A HUMAN EMBRYONAL TESTICULAR CANCER XENOGRAFT
    OSIEKA, R
    GLATTE, P
    SCHMIDT, CG
    CANCER TREATMENT REPORTS, 1984, 68 (05): : 799 - 801
  • [33] INSULIN THERAPY FOR DIABETIC-KETOACIDOSIS - BOLUS INSULIN INJECTION VERSUS CONTINUOUS INSULIN INFUSION
    BUTKIEWICZ, EK
    LEIBSON, CL
    OBRIEN, PC
    PALUMBO, PJ
    RIZZA, RA
    DIABETES CARE, 1995, 18 (08) : 1187 - 1190
  • [34] Continuous infusion versus bolus injection of ultrasound contrast agents in vascular Doppler flow imaging
    Boyajian, RA
    Otis, SM
    STROKE, 2000, 31 (09) : 2277 - 2277
  • [35] Continuous infusion of local anaesthetic following laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial
    Ismail, S.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 (11) : 1441 - 1442
  • [36] Randomized trial of drip infusion versus bolus injection of vinorelbine for the control of local venous toxicity
    Yoh, Kiyotaka
    Niho, Seiji
    Goto, Koichi
    Ohmatsu, Hironobu
    Kubota, Kaoru
    Kakinuma, Ryutaro
    Saijo, Nagahiro
    Nishiwaki, Yutaka
    LUNG CANCER, 2007, 55 (03) : 337 - 341
  • [37] Eight-hour infusion versus bolus injection of doxorubicin in EAP regimen in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC): A prospective randomised trial
    Popov, I
    Jelic, S
    Radosavljevic, D
    Nikolic-Tomasevic, Z
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 35 : S139 - S139
  • [38] Diuretic efficacy of high dose furosemide in severe heart failure: Bolus injection versus continuous infusion
    Dormans, TPJ
    vanMeyel, JJM
    Gerlag, PGG
    Tan, Y
    Russel, FGM
    Smits, P
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1996, 28 (02) : 376 - 382
  • [39] Infusion of factor VIII in patients undergoing surgery: A case controlled study comparing bolus versus continuous infusion.
    Fields, PA
    Cox, M
    Lilley, P
    Lee, CA
    Pasi, KJ
    BLOOD, 1995, 86 (10) : 3467 - 3467
  • [40] Programmed intermittent bolus versus continuous infusion for catheter-based erector spinae plane block on quality of recovery in thoracoscopic surgery: a single-centre randomised controlled trial
    Ni Eochagain, Aisling
    Moorthy, Aneurin
    Shaker, John
    Abdelaatti, Ahmed
    O'Driscoll, Liam
    Lynch, Robert
    Hassett, Aine
    Buggy, Donal J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 133 (04) : 874 - 881