Genomic prediction of agronomic traits in wheat using different models and cross-validation designs

被引:20
|
作者
Haile, Teketel A. [1 ]
Walkowiak, Sean [2 ]
N'Diaye, Amidou [1 ]
Clarke, John M. [1 ]
Hucl, Pierre J. [1 ]
Cuthbert, Richard D. [3 ]
Knox, Ron E. [3 ]
Pozniak, Curtis J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Plant Sci, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[2] Grain Res Lab, Canadian Grain Commiss, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[3] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Semiarid Prairie Agr Res Ctr, Swift Current, SK, Canada
关键词
MARKER-ASSISTED SELECTION; HILBERT-SPACES REGRESSION; REACTION NORM MODEL; HEXAPLOID WHEAT; GENETIC VALUE; QUANTITATIVE TRAITS; ENABLED PREDICTION; AUGMENTED DESIGNS; WIDE ASSOCIATION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1007/s00122-020-03703-z
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Key message Genomic predictions across environments and within populations resulted in moderate to high accuracies but across-population genomic prediction should not be considered in wheat for small population size. Genomic selection (GS) is a marker-based selection suggested to improve the genetic gain of quantitative traits in plant breeding programs. We evaluated the effects of training population (TP) composition, cross-validation design, and genetic relationship between the training and breeding populations on the accuracy of GS in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Two populations of 231 and 304 spring hexaploid wheat lines that were phenotyped for six agronomic traits and genotyped with the wheat 90 K array were used to assess the accuracy of seven GS models (RR-BLUP, G-BLUP, BayesB, BL, RKHS, GS + de novo GWAS, and reaction norm) using different cross-validation designs. BayesB outperformed the other models for within-population genomic predictions in the presence of few quantitative trait loci (QTL) with large effects. However, including fixed-effect marker covariates gave better performance for an across-population prediction when the same QTL underlie traits in both populations. The accuracy of prediction was highly variable based on the cross-validation design, which suggests the importance to use a design that resembles the variation within a breeding program. Moderate to high accuracies were obtained when predictions were made within populations. In contrast, across-population genomic prediction accuracies were very low, suggesting that the evaluated models are not suitable for prediction across independent populations. On the other hand, across-environment prediction and forward prediction designs using the reaction norm model resulted in moderate to high accuracies, suggesting that GS can be applied in wheat to predict the performance of newly developed lines and lines in incomplete field trials.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 398
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cross-validation of multiway component models
    Louwerse, DJ
    Smilde, AK
    Kiers, HAL
    JOURNAL OF CHEMOMETRICS, 1999, 13 (05) : 491 - 510
  • [32] Evaluation of Experiment Designs for MIMO Identification by Cross-Validation
    Haggblom, Kurt E.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2016, 49 (07): : 308 - 313
  • [33] FOOLING YOURSELF WITH CROSS-VALIDATION - SINGLE SAMPLE DESIGNS
    MURPHY, KR
    PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 36 (01) : 111 - 118
  • [34] COMPARISON OF SIMPLE AND COMPLEX-MODELS USING CROSS-VALIDATION
    COLLYER, CE
    BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1985, 23 (04) : 293 - 293
  • [35] Prediction quality of cattle behavior traits evaluated through different cross-validation strategies using wearable sensor data and machine learning algorithms
    Ribeiro, Leonardo Augusto Coelho
    Bresolin, Tiago
    Rosa, Guilherme J. M.
    Casagrande, Daniel Rume
    Camargo Danes, Marina De Arruda
    Dorea, Joao R.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 98 : 383 - 383
  • [36] A Cross-Validation of Statistical Models for Zoned-Based Prediction in Cultivar Testing
    Buntaran, Harimurti
    Piepho, Hans-Peter
    Hagman, Jannie
    Forkman, Johannes
    CROP SCIENCE, 2019, 59 (04) : 1544 - 1553
  • [37] BOOTSTRAP AND CROSS-VALIDATION ESTIMATES OF THE PREDICTION ERROR FOR LINEAR-REGRESSION MODELS
    BUNKE, O
    DROGE, B
    ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1984, 12 (04): : 1400 - 1424
  • [38] Exploring the performance of genomic prediction models for soybean yield using different validation approaches
    Vuk Đorđević
    Marina Ćeran
    Jegor Miladinović
    Svetlana Balešević-Tubić
    Kristina Petrović
    Zlatica Miladinov
    Jelena Marinković
    Molecular Breeding, 2019, 39
  • [39] Reliable estimation of prediction errors for QSAR models under model uncertainty using double cross-validation
    Désirée Baumann
    Knut Baumann
    Journal of Cheminformatics, 6
  • [40] Reliable estimation of prediction errors for QSAR models under model uncertainty using double cross-validation
    Baumann, Desiree
    Baumann, Knut
    JOURNAL OF CHEMINFORMATICS, 2014, 6