Tracing knowledge flows in innovation systems

被引:107
|
作者
Meyer, M
机构
[1] Finnish Inst Enterprise Management, SYO, FIN-00701 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Helsinki Univ Technol, Inst Strategy & Int Business, FIN-02150 Espoo, Finland
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Steunpunkt O&O Statistieken, Louvain, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1023/A:1016057727209
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper gives an overview of quantitative approaches used to study the science/technology linkage. Our discussion is informed by a number of theoretical approaches that have emerged over the past few years in the area of innovation studies emphasizing the exchange of actors in innovation system and a shift in the division of labour between publicly funded basic research and industrial development of technology. We review the more quantitative literature on efforts made to study such linkage phenomena, to which theorizing in the science policy area has attributed great importance. We then introduce a typology of three approaches to study the science/technology linkage - patent citation, industrial science, and university patenting. For each approach, we shall discuss merits and possible disadvantages. In another step we illustrate them using results from studies of the Finnish innovation system. Finally, we list key limitations of the informetric methods and point to possible hybrid approaches that could remedy some of them.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 212
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Knowledge flows and innovation: a pseudo-panel approach
    Biscione, Antonella
    Burlina, Chiara
    de Felice, Annunziata
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024, 56 (30) : 3636 - 3651
  • [32] Politics at a distance: Infrastructuring knowledge flows for democratic innovation
    Voss, Jan-Peter
    Schritt, Jannik
    Sayman, Volkan
    [J]. SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 2022, 52 (01) : 106 - 126
  • [33] Creating actionable knowledge one step at a time: An analytical framework for tracing systems and agency in niche innovation pathways
    Holscher, Katharina
    Wittmayer, Julia M.
    Olfert, Alfred
    Hirschnitz-Garbers, Martin
    Walther, Joerg
    Schiller, Georg
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2023, 46
  • [34] Knowledge exchange for innovation development in open innovation systems
    Schuurman, Dimitri
    Baccarne, Bastiaan
    Coorevits, Lynn
    Georges, Annabel
    Logghe, Sara
    [J]. TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR COMMUNICATIEWETENSCHAP, 2014, 42 (04): : 378 - +
  • [35] Knowledge Flows Percolation Model - a New Model for the Relation between Knowledge and Innovation
    Popescul, Daniela
    [J]. INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: FROM REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT TO WORLD ECONOMIES, VOLS 1-5, 2012, : 2762 - 2769
  • [36] The dynamics of knowledge stocks and knowledge flows: innovation consequences of recruitment and collaboration in biotech
    Al-Laham, Andreas
    Tzabbar, Daniel
    Amburgey, Terry L.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2011, 20 (02) : 555 - 583
  • [37] Knowledge, Innovation, and Entrepreneurial Systems at HICSS
    Jennex, Murray E.
    Dittes, Sven
    Smolnik, Stefan
    Croasdell, David
    King, David
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2018, 43 : 757 - 774
  • [38] Knowledge, complexity, and innovation systems.
    Grimes, S
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS, 2002, 92 (04) : 822 - 825
  • [39] External knowledge flows and innovation capacity: the Italian service industries
    Agostino, Mariarosaria
    Donati, Cristiana
    Trivieri, Francesco
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2020, 34 (03) : 342 - 360
  • [40] Open innovation: Are inbound and outbound knowledge flows really complementary?
    Cassiman, Bruno
    Valentini, Giovanni
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (06) : 1034 - 1046