Predicting Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy

被引:4
|
作者
Jeffers, Abra [1 ]
Sochat, Vanessa [2 ]
Kattan, Michael W. [3 ]
Yu, Changhong [3 ]
Melcon, Erin [4 ]
Yamoah, Kosi [5 ]
Rebbeck, Timothy R. [6 ]
Whittemore, Alice S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Precis Hlth Econ, Austin, TX USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biomed Data Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, 259W Campus Dr,T204, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Dept Urol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
PROSTATE | 2017年 / 77卷 / 03期
关键词
prostate cancer recurrence; prediction model; body mass index; calibration discrimination; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; DISEASE RECURRENCE; MEN; OBESITY; NOMOGRAMS; RACE; AMERICAN; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1002/pros.23268
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Prostate cancer prognosis is variable, and management decisions involve balancing patients' risks of recurrence and recurrence-free death. Moreover, the roles of body mass index (BMI) and race in risk of recurrence are controversial [1,2]. To address these issues, we developed and cross-validated RAPS ( Risks After Prostate Surgery), a personal prediction model for biochemical recurrence (BCR) within 10 years of radical prostatectomy (RP) that includes BMI and race as possible predictors, and recurrence-free death as a competing risk. METHODS. RAPS uses a patient's risk factors at surgery to assign him a recurrence probability based on statistical learning methods applied to a cohort of 1,276 patients undergoing RP at the University of Pennsylvania. We compared the performance of RAPS to that of an existing model with respect to calibration (by comparing observed and predicted outcomes), and discrimination (using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)). RESULTS. RAPS' cross-validated BCR predictions provided better calibration than those of an existing model that underestimated patients' risks. Discrimination was similar for the two models, with BCR AUCs of 0.793, 95% confidence interval (0.766-0.820) for RAPS, and 0.780 (0.745-0.815) for the existing model. RAPS' most important BCR predictors were tumor grade, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and BMI; race was less important [3]. RAPS' predictions can be obtained online at https:// predict. shinyapps. io/raps. CONCLUSION. RAPS' cross-validated BCR predictions were better calibrated than those of an existing model, and BMI information contributed substantially to these predictions. RAPS predictions for recurrence-free death were limited by lack of co-morbidity data; however the model provides a simple framework for extension to include such data. Its use and extension should facilitate decision strategies for post-RP prostate cancer management. (C) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 298
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preoperative parameters for predicting early prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Nelson, CP
    Rubin, MA
    Strawderman, M
    Montie, JE
    Sanda, MG
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2002, 59 (05) : 740 - 745
  • [2] Nomogram Predicting the Probability of Early Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer
    Walz, Jochen
    Chun, Felix K. -H.
    Klein, Eric A.
    Reuther, Alwyn
    Saad, Fred
    Graefen, Markus
    Huland, Hartwig
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (02): : 601 - 607
  • [3] Predicting recurrence after radical prostatectomy for patients with high risk prostate cancer
    Grossfeld, GD
    Latini, DM
    Lubeck, DP
    Mehta, SS
    Carroll, PR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (01): : 157 - 163
  • [4] Nomogram Predicting Probability of Early Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer REPLY
    不详
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (02): : 608 - 608
  • [5] Postoperative nomogram predicting the probability of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Allue, M.
    Borque, A.
    Esteban, L. M.
    Sanz, G.
    Del Amo, J.
    Ponz, R.
    Morote, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2012, 11 (01) : E977 - U49
  • [6] Nomogram Predicting Probability of Early Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer COMMENT
    Kattan, Michael W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (02): : 607 - 608
  • [7] Re: Nomogram Predicting the Probability of Early Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer
    Rassweiler, Jens
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 56 (05) : 885 - 886
  • [9] Preoperative parameters for predicting early prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy - Editorial comment
    Kattan, MW
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2002, 59 (05) : 745 - 745
  • [10] Fusion of Proteomic and Histologic Image Features for Predicting Prostate Cancer Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy
    Lee, G.
    Doyle, S.
    Monaco, J.
    Feldman, M.
    Tomaszewski, J. E.
    Master, S. R.
    Madabhushi, A.
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2011, 91 : 340A - 340A