Predicting recurrence after radical prostatectomy for patients with high risk prostate cancer

被引:94
|
作者
Grossfeld, GD
Latini, DM
Lubeck, DP
Mehta, SS [1 ]
Carroll, PR
机构
[1] Urol Outcomes Res Grp, Dept Urol, Program Urol Oncol, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Ctr Comprehens Canc, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] TAP Pharmaceut Prod Inc, Lake Forest, IL USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2003年 / 169卷 / 01期
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; prostate-specific antigen; biopsy;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64058-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Previous studies have shown that patients with clinical stage T2c-T3 prostate cancer, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis greater than 20 ng./ml. or a biopsy Gleason score of 8 to 10 are at high risk for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy. We determined the most important pretreatment predictors of disease recurrence in this high risk population. Materials and Methods: We identified 547 patients with high risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy at University of California, San Francisco or as part of the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor data base, a longitudinal disease registry of patients with prostate cancer. High risk disease was defined as 1992 American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage T2c-T3 disease in 411 patients, serum PSA at diagnosis greater than 20 ng./ml. in 124 and/or biopsy Gleason score 8 to 10 in 114. Disease recurrence was defined as PSA 0.2 ng./ml. or greater on 2 consecutive occasions after radical prostatectomy or second cancer treatment more than 6 months after surgery. The Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to determine significant independent predictors of disease recurrence. The likelihood of disease recurrence for clinically relevant patient groups was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log rank test. Results: Median followup after surgery was 3.1 years. Disease recurred in 177 patients (32%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that serum PSA at diagnosis, biopsy Gleason score, ethnicity, and the percent of positive prostate biopsies were significant independent predictors of disease recurrence, while patient age and clinical tumor stage were not. Patients with a Gleason score 8 to 10 tumor and a serum PSA of 10 ng./ml. or less had a significantly higher likelihood of remaining disease-free 5 years after surgery than those with PSA greater than 10 ng./ml. (47% versus 19%, p <0.05). Patients with a serum PSA at diagnosis of greater than 20 ng./ml. and a Gleason score of less than 8 had a significantly higher likelihood of remaining disease-free 5 years after surgery than similar patients with a Gleason score of 8 or greater (45% versus 0%, p <0.05). Conclusions: PSA, Gleason score, ethnicity and the percent of positive prostate biopsies appear to be the most important pretreatment predictors of disease recurrence in men with high risk prostate cancer. Patients with high grade disease may continue to be appropriate candidates for local therapy if PSA is less than 10 ng./ml. at diagnosis or there are fewer than 66% positive prostate biopsies.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 163
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predicting Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy
    Jeffers, Abra
    Sochat, Vanessa
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Yu, Changhong
    Melcon, Erin
    Yamoah, Kosi
    Rebbeck, Timothy R.
    Whittemore, Alice S.
    [J]. PROSTATE, 2017, 77 (03): : 291 - 298
  • [2] A qualitative transcriptional signature for predicting the biochemical recurrence risk of prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy
    Li, Xiang
    Huang, Haiyan
    Zhang, Jiahui
    Jiang, Fengle
    Guo, Yating
    Shi, Yidan
    Guo, Zheng
    Ao, Lu
    [J]. PROSTATE, 2020, 80 (05): : 376 - 387
  • [3] EVALUATION OF RISK FACTORS FOR BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Surcel, Cristian
    Mirvald, Cristian
    Pavelescu, Cristian
    Mihai, Victor
    Najjar, Salam
    Savu, Carmen
    Sinescu, I.
    [J]. ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, 2015, 49 (04): : 111 - 125
  • [4] Comparative analysis of genetic risk scores for predicting biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy
    Hsieh, Ai-Ru
    Luo, Yi-Ling
    Bao, Bo-Ying
    Chou, Tzu-Chieh
    [J]. BMC UROLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [5] Efficacy of radical prostatectomy on prostate cancer patients and analysis of risk factors for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Yang, Xinping
    Shi, Yuanyuan
    Lin, Yang
    Tian, Yuxin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUON, 2020, 25 (06): : 2623 - 2628
  • [6] Predicting recurrence following radical prostatectomy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer: Data from CaPSURE
    Grossfeld, GD
    Latini, DM
    Lubeck, DP
    Mehta, SS
    Carroll, PR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04): : 358 - 358
  • [7] Contemporary identification of patients at high risk of early prostate cancer recurrence after radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Roberts, WW
    Bergstralh, EJ
    Blute, ML
    Slezak, JM
    Carducci, M
    Han, M
    Epstein, JI
    Eisenberger, MA
    Walsh, PC
    Partin, AW
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2001, 57 (06) : 1033 - 1037
  • [8] Characteristics and risk factors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer
    Duan, Guanglan
    Wang, Changmei
    Ma, Caihong
    Zhang, Huiming
    Wei, Jinxing
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 10 (03): : 5320 - 5325
  • [9] Prognostic classifier for predicting biochemical recurrence in localized prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy
    Carrion, Albert
    Ingelmo-Torres, Mercedes
    Lozano, Juan Jose
    Montalbo, Ruth
    D'Anna, Maurizio
    Mercader, Claudia
    Velez, Elena
    Ribal, Maria Jose
    Alcaraz, Antonio
    Mengual, Lourdes
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 39 (08) : 493.e17 - 493.e25