A manager's guide to using eDNA metabarcoding in marine ecosystems

被引:17
|
作者
Gold, Zachary [1 ]
Wall, Adam R. [2 ]
Schweizer, Teia M. [3 ]
Pentcheff, N. Dean [2 ]
Curd, Emily E. [4 ]
Barber, Paul H. [1 ]
Meyer, Rachel S. [1 ,5 ]
Wayne, Robert [1 ]
Stolzenbach, Kevin [6 ]
Prickett, Kat [7 ]
Luedy, Justin [8 ]
Wetzer, Regina [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Nat Hist Museum Los Angeles Cty, Divers Initiat Southern Calif Ocean DISCO, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Dept Fish & Wildlife Conservat Biol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[4] Landmark Coll, Dept Nat Sci, Putney, VT USA
[5] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[6] Wood Environm & Infrastruct Inc, San Diego, CA USA
[7] Port Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
[8] Port Long Beach, Long Beach, CA USA
来源
PEERJ | 2022年 / 10卷
关键词
eDNA; Metabarcoding; Management; Biomonitoring; Assessment; Biodiversity; Marine; Protocol; Primer set; Site occupancy; SITE OCCUPANCY MODELS; ENVIRONMENTAL DNA; BARCODE; BIODIVERSITY; CAPTURE; PROGRAM; TOOL;
D O I
10.7717/peerj.14071
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a powerful tool that can enhance marine ecosystem/biodiversity monitoring programs. Here we outline five important steps managers and researchers should consider when developing eDNA monitoring program: (1) select genes and primers to target taxa; (2) assemble or develop comprehensive barcode reference databases; (3) apply rigorous site occupancy based decontamination pipelines; (4) conduct pilot studies to define spatial and temporal variance of eDNA; and (5) archive samples, extracts, and raw sequence data. We demonstrate the importance of each of these considerations using a case study of eDNA metabarcoding in the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. eDNA metabarcoding approaches detected 94.1% (16/17) of species observed in paired trawl surveys while identifying an additional 55 native fishes, providing more comprehensive biodiversity inventories. Rigorous benchmarking of eDNA metabarcoding results improved ecological interpretation and confidence in species detections while providing archived genetic resources for future analyses. Well designed and validated eDNA metabarcoding approaches are ideally suited for biomonitoring applications that rely on the detection of species, including mapping invasive species fronts and endangered species habitats as well as tracking range shifts in response to climate change. Incorporating these considerations will enhance the utility and efficacy of eDNA metabarcoding for routine biomonitoring applications.
引用
收藏
页数:39
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biomonitoring of marine vertebrates in Monterey Bay using eDNA metabarcoding
    Andruszkiewicz, Elizabeth A.
    Starks, Hilary A.
    Chavez, Francisco P.
    Sassoubre, Lauren M.
    Block, Barbara A.
    Boehm, Alexandria B.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (04):
  • [2] Proteinase K is not essential for marine eDNA metabarcoding
    Timmers, Molly A.
    Viehl, Katherine
    Angulo, Cameron
    Hoban, Mykle L.
    Toonen, Robert J.
    Walsh, Cameron A. J.
    Wishingrad, Van
    Bowen, Brian W.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL DNA, 2024, 6 (02):
  • [3] eDNA metabarcoding as a biomonitoring tool for marine protected areas
    Gold, Zachary
    Sprague, Joshua
    Kushner, David J.
    Zerecero Marin, Erick
    Barber, Paul H.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (02):
  • [4] Transforming marine monitoring: Using eDNA metabarcoding to improve the monitoring of the Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas network
    Capurso, Ginevra
    Carroll, Brendan
    Stewart, Kathryn A.
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2023, 156
  • [5] Aquatic eDNA Metabarcoding Reveals Biodiversity and Plankton Composition in River Ecosystems
    Aprilia, Mita
    Effendi, Hefni
    Hariyadi, Sigid
    Permatasari, Prita Ayu
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2023, 32 (04): : 3491 - 3500
  • [6] eDNA metabarcoding in zooplankton improves the ecological status assessment of aquatic ecosystems
    Yang, Jianghua
    Zhang, Xiaowei
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 134
  • [7] Assessing the efficacy of eDNA metabarcoding for measuring microbial biodiversity within forest ecosystems
    Ladin, Zachary S.
    Ferrell, Barbra
    Dums, Jacob T.
    Moore, Ryan M.
    Levia, Delphis F.
    Shriver, W. Gregory
    D'Amico, Vincent
    Trammell, Tara L. E.
    Setubal, Joao Carlos
    Wommack, K. Eric
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [8] Assessing the efficacy of eDNA metabarcoding for measuring microbial biodiversity within forest ecosystems
    Zachary S. Ladin
    Barbra Ferrell
    Jacob T. Dums
    Ryan M. Moore
    Delphis F. Levia
    W. Gregory Shriver
    Vincent D’Amico
    Tara L. E. Trammell
    João Carlos Setubal
    K. Eric Wommack
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 11
  • [9] A National Scale "BioBlitz" Using Citizen Science and eDNA Metabarcoding for Monitoring Coastal Marine Fish
    Agersnap, Sune
    Sigsgaard, Eva Egelyng
    Jensen, Mads Reinholdt
    Avila, Marcelo De Paula
    Carl, Henrik
    Moller, Peter Rask
    Kros, Simon Leed
    Knudsen, Steen Wilhelm
    Wisz, Mary S.
    Thomsen, Philip Francis
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [10] Environmental drivers of Arctic communities based on metabarcoding of marine sediment eDNA
    Geraldi, Nathan R.
    Krause-Jensen, Dorte
    Orberg, Sarah B.
    Fruhe, Larissa
    Sejr, Mikael K.
    Hansen, Jorgen L. S.
    Lund-Hansen, Lars
    Duarte, Carlos M.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 291 (2015)