Transforming marine monitoring: Using eDNA metabarcoding to improve the monitoring of the Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas network

被引:4
|
作者
Capurso, Ginevra [1 ,2 ]
Carroll, Brendan [1 ]
Stewart, Kathryn A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Inst Publ Adm, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Inst Environm Sci CML, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, CML Environm Biol, POB 9518, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding; Good Environmental Status; European marine governance; Marine Strategy Framework Directive; Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas; Marine biodiversity monitoring; ENVIRONMENTAL DNA;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105807
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The creation of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) is central to the European Union's strategy for protecting and restoring marine environments. However, current research indicates that monitoring of MPAs is insufficient to ensure their protective role. In response, the European Commission encourages the development and adoption of more effective monitoring tools for MPAs. Environmental DNA (eDNA) methods may serve this function, but their use in MPA monitoring and management remains relatively unexplored. The current study addresses this gap by examining the potential for eDNA to enhance monitoring within Mediterranean MPAs, where monitoring challenges are especially severe. We addressed the gap by synthesizing the results of two analyses. First, a systematic literature review examined existing applications of eDNA metabarcoding to monitor marine habitats. From the experiences documented in the reviewed literature, we applied a SWOT analysis (a framework used to identify and analyze strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) to assess the tool's appropriateness for EU monitoring requirements. Second, we probed the tool's suitability for Mediterranean MPAs with a questionnaire on monitoring and other challenges completed by the managers of 29 MPAs in the region. The findings of our SWOT analysis demonstrated that when compared to conventional monitoring methods, eDNA frequently outperformed them or acted as a crucial supplement. We also found that eDNA is suitable for most criteria set forth in EU requirements. Our questionnaire revealed monitoring strategy limitations that eDNA approaches may alleviate. Still, eDNA approaches do have drawbacks which may jeopardize its accuracy and sufficiency. Incorporating eDNA monitoring methods has great potential to enhance protection efforts in MPAs in the Mediterranean and elsewhere. Their successful adoption will require improved coordination among stakeholders and current, comprehensive, and customized recommendations for MPA managers. This will improve the overall functioning of MPA networks and thus support the role of MPAs in safeguarding vulnerable marine environments.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] eDNA metabarcoding as a biomonitoring tool for marine protected areas
    Gold, Zachary
    Sprague, Joshua
    Kushner, David J.
    Zerecero Marin, Erick
    Barber, Paul H.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (02):
  • [2] Marine Protected Areas in the Mediterranean Sea: Objectives, Effectiveness and Monitoring
    Fraschetti, Simonetta
    Terlizzi, Antonio
    Micheli, Fiorenza
    Benedetti-Cecchi, Lisandro
    Boero, Ferdinando
    [J]. MARINE ECOLOGY-PUBBLICAZIONI DELLA STAZIONE ZOOLOGICA DI NAPOLI I, 2002, 23 : 190 - 200
  • [3] Biodiversity Monitoring in Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas: Scientific and Methodological Challenges
    Bianchi, Carlo Nike
    Azzola, Annalisa
    Cocito, Silvia
    Morri, Carla
    Oprandi, Alice
    Peirano, Andrea
    Sgorbini, Sergio
    Montefalcone, Monica
    [J]. DIVERSITY-BASEL, 2022, 14 (01):
  • [4] A PRACTICAL APPROACH TO MONITORING MARINE PROTECTED AREAS
    Villalobos, Hector
    Zwolinski, Juan P.
    Godinez-Perez, Carlos A.
    Gonzalez-Maynez, Violeta E.
    Manini-Ramos, Fernando
    Mayotga-Martinez, Molissa
    Michaels, William L.
    Palacios-Higuera, Mitzi S.
    Rubio-Rodriguez, Uriel
    Sarmiento-Lezcano, Airam N.
    Demer, David A.
    [J]. OCEANOGRAPHY, 2021, 34 (03) : 32 - 43
  • [5] Monitoring the traditional fishing effort in marine protected areas on the French Mediterranean coast
    Le Diréach, L
    Cadiou, G
    Boudouresque, CF
    [J]. REVUE D ECOLOGIE-LA TERRE ET LA VIE, 2004, 59 (1-2): : 77 - 84
  • [6] A National Scale "BioBlitz" Using Citizen Science and eDNA Metabarcoding for Monitoring Coastal Marine Fish
    Agersnap, Sune
    Sigsgaard, Eva Egelyng
    Jensen, Mads Reinholdt
    Avila, Marcelo De Paula
    Carl, Henrik
    Moller, Peter Rask
    Kros, Simon Leed
    Knudsen, Steen Wilhelm
    Wisz, Mary S.
    Thomsen, Philip Francis
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [7] Mediterranean marine protected areas
    Juanes, F
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2001, 16 (04) : 169 - 170
  • [8] Regular monitoring and targeted removals can control lionfish in Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas
    Kleitou, Periklis
    Rees, Sian
    Cecconi, Francesco
    Kletou, Demetris
    Savva, Ioannis
    Cai, Leda L.
    Hall-Spencer, Jason M.
    [J]. AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2021, 31 (10) : 2870 - 2882
  • [9] eDNA metabarcoding enriches traditional trawl survey data for monitoring biodiversity in the marine environment
    He, X.
    Jeffery, N. W.
    Stanley, R. R. E.
    Hamilton, L. C.
    Rubidge, E. M.
    Abbott, C. L.
    [J]. ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2023, 80 (05) : 1529 - 1538
  • [10] PERSPECTIVES FOR PROTECTED MARINE AREAS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN
    COGNETTI, G
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 1986, 17 (05) : 185 - 186